On 17.06.2003 21:28:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
Instinctively, I wouldn't trust any code in the
package root of org.apache.fop -- we wouldn't have a
very modularized design that way (knowing FOP's
current coding style, the main FOP API would then be
accessing objects all through the packages,
Christian Geisert schrieb:
Oleg Tkachenko schrieb:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I agree, so +1 from me.
Here is my +1.
+1
Clearly enough +1 and no -1, congratulations Glen!
According to http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html the account
request should be handled by the PMC - so Jeremias or Peter
would
Can do.
Here's the new account request form that we need to fill:
New account request form:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pmc@project.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache account request
Full name:...
Preferred userid: ...
Forwarding email address: ...
Christian Geisert wrote:
What's going on with the new logo?
The logo #30 [1] won the contest. It's by Tobias Muller, modified by Scott
Hofmann. Some of us talked about additional tweaking and Scott said [2] he's
ready to go for it. That's it afaik.
I propose to put an end to this - let's
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20879.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20879.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20879.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bertrand et al:
I did a little work in RTFHandler yesterday (after reading the wiki
related email messages on the topic), committing a change to implement
text-align for paragraphs, mostly just to get a feel for what is going on
there. I was using examples/fo/basic/normal.fo as my test document,
+1 for working on JFOR integration.
If JFOR's sources should go into CVS, I think from the licensing point
of view, Bertrand will have to do the initial import of the sources. I
believe, this performs an implicit grant process because of his
committer license agreement.
Victor, I don't want to
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
+1 for working on JFOR integration.
If JFOR's sources should go into CVS, I think from the licensing point
of view, Bertrand will have to do the initial import of the sources. I
believe, this performs an implicit grant process because of his
committer license
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17.06.2003 21:28:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
Instinctively, I wouldn't trust any code in the
package root of org.apache.fop -- we wouldn't have
a
very modularized design that way (knowing FOP's
current coding style, the main FOP API would then
Victor,
Trying to answer your latest questions on this topic has absorbed a deal
of my time, exposed a contradiction in my thinking, and made me think
through in more detail some of the fuzzy bits. I am still working on
it, and I will get back to you. Thanks for the interrogation.
Peter
--
Jeremias,
I'll try it and commit if it works.
Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hmm, I've given up running Ant under Eclipse. Gave me too much of a
headache and it works well for me outside of Eclipse.
But I think the trick is to use ${basedir} instead of . in build.xml
because Eclipse has to set the
16 matches
Mail list logo
