Glen Mazza wrote:
There are already other AFP Renderers for FOP
0.20.5--actually Hansuli has it in our resources page:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/resources.html
I agree with Pete here - this AFP renderer is too disjointed and has a few
limitations which make it too unpractical.
And--amazing what
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hehe, and then there was the one by UBS which I asked them to make OSS
and they declined even after killing the project.
I don't think there's a big legal problem around AFP, it's probably more
the technology itself that has the attribute may cost a bit more on it.
:-) While
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2004 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AFP Renderer
Glen Mazza wrote:
There are already other AFP Renderers for FOP
0.20.5--actually Hansuli has it in our resources page:
Return Receipt
Your RE: AFP Renderer
document
:
Glen Mazza wrote:
My primary goal is not to get this committed. But
if you have code you wish to donate to the ASF, just
do so via Bugzilla. It doesn't matter which
format--it is the logic in the code that is being
sought. No guarantees, however, as to it ever getting
committed into FOP,
Townsend, Pete wrote:
Glen,
I'll get this added as a patch (via Bugzilla as Chris suggested). The
developer forum can then decide if this is something you wish to take
forward (perhaps someone can get feedback from the user community as to
whether it would be desirable). It has saved us a huge
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Well I did it for an internal project and was never allowed to release
the code so it has remained unchanged and closed for some time now. I
still believe that all is needed is for someone to start put the code
into the public. The basic format (although binary and a bit
Hi
I have a problem with columns : How can I tell the
XSL parser to forward to an other page the columns
wich overflow the width of the page.
thanx.
Vous manquez despace pour stocker vos mails ?
Yahoo! Mail vous offre GRATUITEMENT 100 Mo !
Créez
I'll migrate the code so that it works with latest from head. Sorry for the
confusion, I wasn't implying a code dump, the situation is that I am the
person putting pressure on the company to release the code and I need to get
it into the public domain before I move onto my next internal project.
--- Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
also the issue of the damage done to the FOP's
reputation as a whole should it ship with
renderers
that operate only partially or incorrectly.
Well, FOP already has renderers in this state: PCL
and Text.
Yes, but that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
!!!ATTENTION CE COURRIER N'EST PAS ARRIVE A DESTINATION!!!
Due a une très forte progression du SPAM sur notre boite aux lettres, nous vous prions
de bien vouloir transférer votre courriel a notre nouvelle adresse: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci de votre compréhension
Alacuisine.Net
!!!ATTENTION CE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have not been complaints from users. Apparently FOP works fine with the
default XML parser and XSLT processor in java 1.4.
Uh, well, this is just plain wrong. There have been *lots* of complaints
about a slew of Xalan problems and a few Xerces bugs in the various
1.4
I think Simon meant 1.4.2 (*not* 1.4), which is more
correct, I believe. I think he had even shown earlier
that the ones we distribute with FOP won't work with
FOP, while the ones already distributed with the SDK
1.4.2 will.
Glen
--- J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:41:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-03 12:41 ---
These are the new methods added; at the moment, I added them to the
LayoutManager interface, but maybe it could be better to create a new
interface
Well, Finn's proposal is certainly looking nicer with
the new LM classes, as it would have far less layout
logic it would need to contain. If we can get it down
to one file, resembling our FOElementMapping class,
nothing but makers and devoid of layout logic, that
would be OK with me. Not my
!!!ATTENTION CE COURRIER N'EST PAS ARRIVE A DESTINATION!!!
Due a une très forte progression du SPAM sur notre boite aux lettres, nous vous prions
de bien vouloir transférer votre courriel a notre nouvelle adresse: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci de votre compréhension
Alacuisine.Net
!!!ATTENTION CE
19 matches
Mail list logo
