Clay Leeds wrote:
Perhaps I might even pick up a Java book and figure out how to add
command line parameters to FOP (I'm hoping I won't have to figure out
the issue that Glen and Andreas raised[1] in February, though...:-p).
Sure, you'll have plenty of Java coding experience if you wish--there
Glen Mazza wrote:
So let me start off the voting: +1.
+1
--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
Glen Mazza wrote:
snip/
The updates and issues he has brought up to us this
week, I'm sure he would be happy to take care of for
us, just as soon as we provide him write access. I
also hope he develops a psychological concept of
ownership of our website over time, resulting in it
looking
Glen Mazza wrote:
Team,
Waxing chutzpaic, I'd like us to try again to make
Clay a committer on this project. You may recall his
+1
(in the hope that we finally get those breadcrumbs fixed and a whole
site pdf ;-)
Christian
Glen Mazza wrote:
[...]
+1
J.Pietschmann
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
Perhaps I might even pick up a Java book and figure out how to add
command line parameters to FOP (I'm hoping I won't have to figure out
the issue that Glen and Andreas raised[1] in February, though...:-p).
Why...
Team,
Waxing chutzpaic, I'd like us to try again to make
Clay a committer on this project. You may recall his
committership didn't pass last December (I can't
remember who blocked it, it might have been Jeremias
;-), but especially with the loss of Victor, I think
it's becoming increasingly
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
So let me start off the voting: +1.
No need to think this over: +1.
Cheers,
Andreas
+1, again, for Clay.
Thanks, Glen, for doing a better job at formulating a new committer
proposal than I did.
Would you please enlighten me what the words below mean?
On 29.02.2004 22:10:42 Glen Mazza wrote:
Waxing chutzpaic,
Jeremias Maerki
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So let me start off the voting: +1.
No need to think this over: +1.
+1
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you please enlighten me what the words below
mean?
On 29.02.2004 22:10:42 Glen Mazza wrote:
Waxing chutzpaic,
Well, that joke didn't work. ;)
Long Answer: There's a certain amount of chutzpah
inherent in the statement I'd like us to
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to propose
Web Maestro Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev and
user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's actively helping out on
the user mailing list and as our favourite nit-picker :-)
I appreciate the nod from fop-dev team for my nomination. It came as a
very pleasant surprise to me. I've been waiting for the VOTE to pan out
before making comments. In any case, my intention is to continue on the
same path of learning and service as before.
Web Maestro Clay
On Dec 28, 2003,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to propose
Web Maestro Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev and
user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's actively helping out on
the user mailing list and as our favourite nit-picker :-)
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
+1 from me.
+1
J.Pietschmann
Le Dimanche, 28 déc 2003, à 15:38 Europe/Zurich, Jeremias Maerki a
écrit :
In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to
propose
Web Maestro Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev
and
user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's actively helping out
on
It's not a veto, I just used that term to remind
others that committerships require a unanimous vote.
My vote is still -1.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A veto must always be accompanied by an explanation.
Without an
explanation a veto is invalid.
In recognition for his contributions to this project I'd like to propose
Web Maestro Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's active on both dev and
user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's actively helping out on
the user mailing list and as our favourite nit-picker :-) he was
instrumental in
-1 (veto)
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition for his contributions to this project
I'd like to propose
Web Maestro Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's
active on both dev and
user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's
actively helping out on
the user
A veto must always be accompanied by an explanation. Without an
explanation a veto is invalid.
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html
Clay has never submitted any Java-related patches but he cares about the
website (and has submitted patches in this area) and helps on the user
mailing
20 matches
Mail list logo
