Townsend, Pete wrote:
Dear fop-dev,
The AFP renderer has now been added to sourceforge
http://afp-renderer.sourceforge.net and a release is available for download
compatible with FOP 0.20.5, please could you close the patch on bugzilla
31213 (or direct them to the above link) so that people don't
On Sep 29, 2004, at 2:54 AM, Townsend, Pete wrote:
Dear fop-dev,
The AFP renderer has now been added to sourceforge
http://afp-renderer.sourceforge.net and a release is available for
download
compatible with FOP 0.20.5, please could you close the patch on
bugzilla
31213 (or direct them to the
didn't include the new files.
(cvs diff -wuNr fop-0_20_2-maintain xml-fop patch.txt)
Pete.
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 September 2004 03:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pete Townsend
Subject: Re: AFP Renderer Patch
I stay away from WinCVS and just use
Yes, it's probably best if you include the new files in a ZIP file and
attach that separately.
On 13.09.2004 11:20:37 Townsend, Pete wrote:
Ok, I did try the command line option as well (with the version of CVS
shipped with WinCVS) - Is my problem related to the fact that these are new
java
I stay away from WinCVS and just use the command line:
c:\cvs diff -u c:\mypatch.txt
Thanks,
Glen
--- Pete Townsend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to generate the patch for the AFP
renderer, something I've not done before!
Glen Mazza wrote:
There are already other AFP Renderers for FOP
0.20.5--actually Hansuli has it in our resources page:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/resources.html
I agree with Pete here - this AFP renderer is too disjointed and has a few
limitations which make it too unpractical.
And--amazing what
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hehe, and then there was the one by UBS which I asked them to make OSS
and they declined even after killing the project.
I don't think there's a big legal problem around AFP, it's probably more
the technology itself that has the attribute may cost a bit more on it.
:-) While
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2004 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AFP Renderer
Glen Mazza wrote:
There are already other AFP Renderers for FOP
0.20.5--actually Hansuli has it in our resources page:
http
Return Receipt
Your RE: AFP Renderer
document
Glen Mazza wrote:
My primary goal is not to get this committed. But
if you have code you wish to donate to the ASF, just
do so via Bugzilla. It doesn't matter which
format--it is the logic in the code that is being
sought. No guarantees, however, as to it ever getting
committed into FOP,
Townsend, Pete wrote:
Glen,
I'll get this added as a patch (via Bugzilla as Chris suggested). The
developer forum can then decide if this is something you wish to take
forward (perhaps someone can get feedback from the user community as to
whether it would be desirable). It has saved us a huge
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Well I did it for an internal project and was never allowed to release
the code so it has remained unchanged and closed for some time now. I
still believe that all is needed is for someone to start put the code
into the public. The basic format (although binary and a bit
://www.barrsystems.com/product/afpviewer/default.asp
Regards, Pete.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2004 09:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AFP Renderer
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hehe, and then there was the one by UBS which I asked
--- Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
also the issue of the damage done to the FOP's
reputation as a whole should it ship with
renderers
that operate only partially or incorrectly.
Well, FOP already has renderers in this state: PCL
and Text.
Yes, but that
are the timescales for a
developer release?
Regards, Pete.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 August 2004 12:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AFP Renderer
Townsend, Pete wrote:
Dear FOP Developers,
Could you let me know
Hehe, and then there was the one by UBS which I asked them to make OSS
and they declined even after killing the project.
I don't think there's a big legal problem around AFP, it's probably more
the technology itself that has the attribute may cost a bit more on it.
:-) While it would be great to
Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 August 2004 13:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AFP Renderer
There are already other AFP Renderers for FOP
0.20.5--actually Hansuli has it in our resources page:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/resources.html
And--amazing what Google searches turn up--Keiron
My primary goal is not to get this committed. But
if you have code you wish to donate to the ASF, just
do so via Bugzilla. It doesn't matter which
format--it is the logic in the code that is being
sought. No guarantees, however, as to it ever getting
committed into FOP, because we don't have
- they are likely to be reluctant
to have the code released elsewhere (i.e. on a resource page) - we have a
very sensitive legal department!
Regards, Pete.
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 August 2004 14:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AFP Renderer
My
This is really a great add on to FOP. Particularly for people who want to
print in the mainframe environment with the AFP printers.
Thanks a lot Anderegg.
-Rajendran
- Original Message -
From: J.U. Anderegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December
20 matches
Mail list logo
