there!
I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in
the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement.
It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course
it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should I
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Peter
On 20.12.2002 00:30:13 Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
:-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the
trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong
message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi
Hello there!
I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in
the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement.
It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course
it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should
on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in
the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement.
It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course
it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should I
commit it to the branch
Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in
the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement.
It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course
it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question
