border-before-width length-conditional

2005-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the conditional part of a length-conditional (ex. in border-before-width) has no effect (i.e. is ignored)? Thanks, Jeremias Maerki

RE: border-before-width length-conditional

2005-02-21 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the conditional part of a length-conditional (ex. in border-before-width) has no effect (i.e. is ignored)? That doesn't sound right. I just did a cursory review of the standard and can't find any support for

Re: border-before-width length-conditional

2005-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Then, I'm wondering how to handle the conditional part (7.7.9) in this case because I don't have a clue and it seems not to go well with the collapsing nature of these borders as well as the rules 1-5 in 6.7.10 for border-collapse=collapse. Also, I don't think the associated edge is (can be) a

Re: border-before-width length-conditional

2005-02-21 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Jeremias Maerki a écrit : Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the conditional part of a length-conditional (ex. in border-before-width) has no effect (i.e. is ignored)? I would answer no, actually not exactly. If I understand the spec correctly, the conditional part has an

Re: border-before-width length-conditional

2005-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ah yes, that makes sense. Thanks a lot Vincent. I didn't think about that. On 21.02.2005 21:54:19 Vincent Hennebert wrote: Jeremias Maerki a écrit : Am I right that for a table-cell in collapsing border model the conditional part of a length-conditional (ex. in border-before-width) has no

Re: another nose for the grindstone

2005-02-21 Thread Renaud Richardet
bonjour fop-devs i would like to work on the awt renderer. Mark (or someone else) , are you working on it? i checked out the code from FOP 0.20.5. is it the latest maintenance version? thanks, renaud On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:54:43 +0100, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark We'd

Re: another nose for the grindstone

2005-02-21 Thread Mark Brucks
Renaud et al I've had less time to devote to it than I thought, but I am working my way carefully through the spec (and trying to keep up with the posts to fop-dev). The bottom line is that I'm not actively working on the code yet - I hope to be by April. So, if you've got time now, you

Re: another nose for the grindstone

2005-02-21 Thread The Web Maestro
On Feb 21, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Renaud Richardet wrote: bonjour fop-devs Salut! Bienvenue! i would like to work on the awt renderer. Mark (or someone else) , are you working on it? i checked out the code from FOP 0.20.5. is it the latest maintenance version? thanks, renaud Actually, the fop-0.20.5

Re: another nose for the grindstone

2005-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Clay, he knows that. I told him to use the maintenance branch code as a reference for bringing back the AWT Renderer in CVS HEAD. Renaud and I met last Friday at lots.ch. So, Renaud, please use the code found under the fop-0_20_2-maintain branch for reference. And happy hacking! On 22.02.2005

Renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer

2005-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Now that we've got someone who will work on the AWT Renderer I'd like to know if someone is against renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer. The API in use is actually the Java2D API [1], although most of the classes had their origin within AWT (and are still in there). AWT is actually the