Re: Skype-conference on page-breaking?

2005-03-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks, Luca. I've had a nice casual talk on the phone with Simon, yesterday. Essentially, we only talked about very high-level stuff, especially the decision for a certain strategy (or two). You know I came up with the idea to create a simpler best-fit strategy with no look-ahead for

Re: Skype-conference on page-breaking?

2005-03-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I don't know why this is important to you but it's two to three months. On 04.03.2005 12:40:04 Peter B. West wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Sounds very interesting. Would you consider sharing what you already have? This may help us in the general discussion and may be a good starting point.

Re: FOP at ApacheCon Europe 2005?

2005-03-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
FYI, I've just given myself a shove, followed Bertrand's suggestion and submitted a session proposal for ApacheCon. I feel that our project should be present there. I was also thinking about something like hidden treasures in the XML Graphics project but I guess there's not so much meat on that

Re: FOP at ApacheCon Europe 2005?

2005-03-07 Thread Glen Mazza
Fantastic! I hope to be able to do the same someday. Glen --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, I've just given myself a shove, followed Bertrand's suggestion and submitted a session proposal for ApacheCon. I feel that our project should be present there. I was also thinking

Re: Skype-conference on page-breaking?

2005-03-07 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I don't know why this is important to you Just curious. but it's two to three months. Ouch. Good luck. You might want to keep an eye on Folio. Peter On 04.03.2005 12:40:04 Peter B. West wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Sounds very interesting. Would you consider sharing what

Re: future of FOP

2005-03-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Michael, if you follow the fop-dev mailing list you will realize that the development has not come to a stand-still. It is true that the last release is almost two years old. We're in a redesign phase which tries to address exactly the issue of keeps among other things. The redesign took a lot

Re: future of FOP

2005-03-07 Thread Chris Bowditch
Jeremias Maerki wrote: snip/ I understand that IBM is quite big in the document business. It would be very interesting if IBM committed to supporting FOP like they do for other open source projects here at the Apache Software Foundation. As far as I know IBM even has its own implementation of

Re: FOP at ApacheCon Europe 2005?

2005-03-07 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I was also thinking about something like hidden treasures in the XML Graphics project but I guess there's not so much meat on that bone to fill one hour. Well, there should be enough for an hour, at least in theory. I couldn't convice (yet) my boss that I have an important

Re: FOP at ApacheCon Europe 2005?

2005-03-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Cool, that would be great stuff. Let's hope your boss lets you off the leash. On 07.03.2005 23:57:50 J.Pietschmann wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I was also thinking about something like hidden treasures in the XML Graphics project but I guess there's not so much meat on that bone to fill

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-07 Thread Renaud Richardet
I worked on my patch and tried to integrate you inputs. There are still many issues, but I think the basic structure is OK. You can find a patch attached to bug 33760. Comments inline: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Victor Mote wrote: 1. FOray has factored the FOP font logic into a separate module,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.