Hi,
I'm just curious to know what people have found works best for them as
an alternative to achieving somewhat auto table layout? I'm currently
trying to figure out what I should do. I've just started learning XSL
as a result of beginning to use FOP to try to automatically create a
catalogue
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 16:08, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
snip /
I'm just curious to know what people have found works best for them as
an alternative to achieving somewhat auto table layout? I'm currently
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
Thanks for the example.
vMax is a string length in this example though, right? Correct me if
I'm wrong, but I don't think proportional-column
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:08, James Earl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Say you have a max record width (sum of all respective max field widths) of
65, then each column gets its width according to a calculation like
[( proportional-width / 65
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:12, James Earl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:08, James Earl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Say you have a max record width (sum of all respective max field widths)
of
65, then each column gets its width according
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
James Earl wrote:
...
Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto
table layout!!!
Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do this on
it's own rather than requiring special workarounds
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:36, James Earl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
James Earl wrote:
...
Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto
table layout!!!
Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:50, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
I'm not sure if I'm doing this right... but the following gave
acceptable results:
snip /
Total: 53
So far, you're on the right track
