Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 13:35:51 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit :
Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 18:36:05 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit :
Hi!
Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 13:05:55 (+0200 CEST), Michael Prokop a écrit :
{...}
What I've on my TODO list are:
* undbx
*
Hello,
you're maintaining a Debian package which provides a trigger file.
Currently a package that activates a trigger is put in the
triggers-awaited status where it doesn't fulfill dependencies.
The trigger must first be processed and only then is the package
considered as installed.
I believe
On 06/03/2011 10:24 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
2/ If your package uses the activate directive, is it important that
your package be considered as not configured (and thus not satisfying
dependencies) until the trigger has been processed?
i don't use any of the triggers but the one for
unfortunately, there's nothing i can do about it. the spam that gets
through comes through some alioth queue we can't control (like the bug
messages or so; they also get in 'unfiltered').
Who controls it?
Can't it just be restricted to subscribers only?
it is already subscribers only
Hi Julien,
First all, thanks for your help and advices. Here some answers
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:55:37PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
* Remove useless comments from debian/rules
Done.
* You don't need to refer to your patch in the changelog, it's a new
package. The README.Debian
