Le vendredi 03 juin 2011 à 07:29 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit :
Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 17:13:57 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit :
Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 09:46:02 (+0200 CEST), Christophe Monniez a écrit :
Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 09:15 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit :
Unfortunately,
Accepted:
libphash0-dev_0.9.4-1.1_i386.deb
to main/libp/libphash/libphash0-dev_0.9.4-1.1_i386.deb
libphash0_0.9.4-1.1_i386.deb
to main/libp/libphash/libphash0_0.9.4-1.1_i386.deb
libphash_0.9.4-1.1.diff.gz
to main/libp/libphash/libphash_0.9.4-1.1.diff.gz
libphash_0.9.4-1.1.dsc
to
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:02:36 +
with message-id e1qv56s-0001fy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#620933: fixed in libphash 0.9.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #620933,
regarding libphash: Please don't install libtool la-file in dev-package (Policy
10.2)
to be
Accepted:
libtsk-dev_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/s/sleuthkit/libtsk-dev_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
libtsk3-3-dbg_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/s/sleuthkit/libtsk3-3-dbg_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
libtsk3-3_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/s/sleuthkit/libtsk3-3_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
sleuthkit_3.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:30:43 +0200
with message-id 20110611053043.gc2...@kirya.net
and subject line Closing bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #611101,
regarding new version is available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:30:43 +0200
with message-id 20110611053043.gc2...@kirya.net
and subject line Closing bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #549071,
regarding sleuthkit: compile against afflib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
