On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:45:15AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Christophe Monniez [Mon Apr 29, 2013 at 08:41:23AM +0200]:
Le samedi 27 avril 2013 à 22:48 +0200, Elías Alejandro a écrit :
I was checking extundelete and I saw Christophe's work
for 0.2.3 version (btw, thanks
Hi all,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
Hi,
Elías Alejandro did work on the reglookup package (thanks!), but it
seems not to be uploaded yet. Is there anything specific outstanding?
I just want to say any help will be valuable. I'm a little bit busy,
new
Hi,
2011/10/28 Tim tim-forens...@sentinelchicken.org
It looks like elias on freenode is someone else. Are you on
freenode at all? Come find me, my handle is Adian.
I'm sorry. I'm under oftc. Ok I'll check once again reglookup.
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
Hi all,
2011/10/27 Michael Prokop m...@grml.org
Hi,
Elías Alejandro did work on the reglookup package (thanks!), but it
seems not to be uploaded yet. Is there anything specific outstanding?
Since Tim probably incorporate those patches for the next release, I wonder
if we can hope
. The library is also used by the new version of grokevt.
It now use scons to build.
I don't know how to handle this.
Let me know on the list what you think about those points.
I could take a look to reglookup this weekend.
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
/deps/dep5/
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
ok.
Also, I have noticed the comments in src/extundelete.cc state the program is
distributed under GPL-2 and not GPL-2+.
I've Added this copyright/license.
Also I've tested with pbuilder and piuparts and it seems works fine.
Best regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
think now is a little bit more improved.
* debhelper compatibility should be bumped to 8 given you build-depend on
= 8.0.0
Done.
Please let me know any news and I will work in about it.
Best regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
___
forensics-devel
://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=forensics/extundelete.git;a=summary
Best regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Hi Forensic team,
I'd like to know what can I do to view extundelete[1]
released under Debian?
Maybe I'm delayed but I'd appreciate any suggestions
or advices.
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=forensics/extundelete.git
Best regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
Hi,
I've just updated the git repository. [1]
Please could anyone review it?
[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/extundelete.git;a=summary
Best regards,
--
Elías
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:45:08PM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote:
I prefer to have an option that would permit the user to choose the
directory name where to drop the undelete files.
But I think that the better way is to ask the upstream author or to give
him a patch.
Ok, I've applied a
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote:
- We should ask the upstream author to add an option to specify
the directory where we want the files to be restored.
I apologize for the delay. I had a lot work :(
About it, I was trying it, and
bug #569085
furthermore appears to be lintian clean
Please, could you review it.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
in packaging this software.
Are you interested in joining our team so that we can do team work on
this package ?
Ok, I think extundelete will be better under forensics team. Should I create
a new repository on alioth? or Do I wait to join in the team?
I'm sorry I'm newbie.
Kind regards,
--
Elías
15 matches
Mail list logo
