Re: unhide packaging
Hi Christophe, Le samedi 11 juin 2011 à 10:38:06 (+0200 CEST), Christophe Monniez a écrit : Le samedi 11 juin 2011 à 09:57 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit : Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 13:35:51 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit : [...] undbx and dc3dd seem also ready for upload but would need more testing. Is anyone able to do this? I'll do that on monday ! Have you been able to test undbx? Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: unhide packaging
Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 13:35:51 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit : Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 18:36:05 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi! Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 13:05:55 (+0200 CEST), Michael Prokop a écrit : {...} What I've on my TODO list are: * undbx * ssdeep (file conflicts) * sleuthkit * dc3dd * md5deep If you can help here we'd highly welcome that. I'll take a deeper look at sleuthkit as I had already commited some changes after Chritophe's email about the package. I'll see what I can do for the others. md5deep and ssdeep interest me also. unhide and md5deep were updated and uploaded. As already discussed, sleuthkit needs some testing, just as would ssdeep. These are tools I do not know at all… I'll try and give some love to undbx and dc3dd this afternoon. undbx and dc3dd seem also ready for upload but would need more testing. Is anyone able to do this? Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: unhide packaging
Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 18:36:05 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi! Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 13:05:55 (+0200 CEST), Michael Prokop a écrit : {...} What I've on my TODO list are: * undbx * ssdeep (file conflicts) * sleuthkit * dc3dd * md5deep If you can help here we'd highly welcome that. I'll take a deeper look at sleuthkit as I had already commited some changes after Chritophe's email about the package. I'll see what I can do for the others. md5deep and ssdeep interest me also. unhide and md5deep were updated and uploaded. As already discussed, sleuthkit needs some testing, just as would ssdeep. These are tools I do not know at all… I'll try and give some love to undbx and dc3dd this afternoon. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: unhide packaging
Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 18:54 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi there, I am wondering if it is ok for me to update unhide to the latest upstream version and add me as an uploader for the package. Sure, no problem, that's why we are a team :) The new version was released in January, and the package hasn't been updated for more than 1 year. I'd also like to add a call to a trigger allowing rkhunter to update its database when unhide is installed as a dependency of rkhunter (or at the same time). This would allow me to fix #607224 in rkhunter, and begin working on finding a solution for the 2.5 years old #512087… I can push my changes straight away, and wait for Christophe to have a look at the changes (he knows the package better than I do). That's not totally true, this package, like some others is an old heritage from 2009 when Daniel left debian Forensics. At this moment, he had too much package and he asked me to get all forensics related packages that he was responsible for. The fact is that it's too much packages for me too and I don't have time to manage all of them. That's why the forensic team is a great opportunity to divide the workload. So, for this package, I have to admit that I don't know it very well and if you want, you can set you as maintainer instead of me. Thanks in advance Cheers, Julien Thanks to you Julien. A bientôt. -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: unhide packaging
Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 08:59:23 (+0200 CEST), Christophe Monniez a écrit : Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 18:54 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi there, I am wondering if it is ok for me to update unhide to the latest upstream version and add me as an uploader for the package. Sure, no problem, that's why we are a team :) As I am new in the team, I still don't know the specific rules, hence prefer asking ;) [...] I can push my changes straight away, and wait for Christophe to have a look at the changes (he knows the package better than I do). That's not totally true, this package, like some others is an old heritage from 2009 when Daniel left debian Forensics. At this moment, he had too much package and he asked me to get all forensics related packages that he was responsible for. The fact is that it's too much packages for me too and I don't have time to manage all of them. That's why the forensic team is a great opportunity to divide the workload. I see... I'd like to do more for the team, but will go step by step. If there are any package which need to be updated, I can have a look rather quickly. So, for this package, I have to admit that I don't know it very well and if you want, you can set you as maintainer instead of me. OK, I'll do this as it is directly related to rkhunter and unhide.rb. I had even worked on the initial packaging I think. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: unhide packaging
Hi! Le mercredi 01 juin 2011 à 13:05:55 (+0200 CEST), Michael Prokop a écrit : {...} I see... I'd like to do more for the team, but will go step by step. If there are any package which need to be updated, I can have a look rather quickly. Cool! What I've on my TODO list are: * undbx * ssdeep (file conflicts) * sleuthkit * dc3dd * md5deep If you can help here we'd highly welcome that. I'll take a deeper look at sleuthkit as I had already commited some changes after Chritophe's email about the package. I'll see what I can do for the others. md5deep and ssdeep interest me also. I'll take care of xmount and guymager soon. Sorry for not being more active, but real life was too busy and I've to catch up with lots of stuff... So, for this package, I have to admit that I don't know it very well and if you want, you can set you as maintainer instead of me. OK, I'll do this as it is directly related to rkhunter and unhide.rb. I had even worked on the initial packaging I think. Thanks for your efforts Julien, very much appreciated! Thanks for your warm welcome. BTW: Do you plan to attend DebConf11? Unfortunately, I won't have this chance. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
unhide packaging
Hi there, I am wondering if it is ok for me to update unhide to the latest upstream version and add me as an uploader for the package. The new version was released in January, and the package hasn't been updated for more than 1 year. I'd also like to add a call to a trigger allowing rkhunter to update its database when unhide is installed as a dependency of rkhunter (or at the same time). This would allow me to fix #607224 in rkhunter, and begin working on finding a solution for the 2.5 years old #512087… I can push my changes straight away, and wait for Christophe to have a look at the changes (he knows the package better than I do). Thanks in advance Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel