Well, the only thing this proves is really that unhide.rb didn't show false
positives which is good I guess...
rkhunter supports using both variants though, so feel free to keep the one
you find more useful. And if you *do* run into something, unhide.rb will
tell you the name of the suspicious
#624694: Please try unhide.rb
Resent-Date:Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:45:04 +
Resent-From:Debian BTS debb...@buxtehude.debian.org
Resent-To: xiscu xi...@email.de
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:43:50 +0100
From: xiscu xi...@email.de
Reply-To: xiscu xi...@email.de, 624694-qu
The result is:
# unhide.rb -v
Scanning for hidden processes...
No hidden processes found!
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Hi,
There is a bug in sysinfo, some kernel schedulers are not reliable. You can
try the latest version of Unhide (not yet released) where this test is
removed
http://sourceforge.net/projects/unhide/files/unhide_20121229.tgz/download
2013/1/6 xiscu xi...@email.de
The result is:
# unhide.rb
