On 21.05.2010 15:14, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com [Tue May 18, 2010 at 02:57:41PM
+0200]:
So manpage is not needed, I could probably removed those. Others are
only minor warnings.
Hm, would it be worth the effort providing init scripts?
I'd prefer if
* Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian.org [Thu May 20, 2010 at 12:21:46PM
-0300]:
Citando Michael Prokop m...@debian.org:
@Debian-Forensics team: are we interested in this package?
Package sounds good and it would be nice having it in Debian, but IMO it
has not to do with forensics.
Ok,
* Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com [Tue May 18, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0200]:
On 18.05.2010 13:31, Michael Prokop wrote:
I was directed to this mailing list by Asheesh Laroia.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package logkeys. I would also note
that I'm familiar with this process as, for
Hi,
Vedran, first of all - sorry for the long delay in answering your mail.
* Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com [Tue Apr 06, 2010 at 10:54:43PM +0200]:
I was directed to this mailing list by Asheesh Laroia.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package logkeys. I would also note
that I'm
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 13:31 +0200, Michael Prokop a écrit :
@Debian-Forensics team: are we interested in this package?
regards,
-mika-
Hi,
I'm not sure that it fits in Debian forensics.
What do others think about that ?
--
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be
On 18.05.2010 13:31, Michael Prokop wrote:
Hi,
Vedran, first of all - sorry for the long delay in answering your mail.
No problem, better late than never. ;)
I was directed to this mailing list by Asheesh Laroia.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package logkeys. I would also note
that
