Re: Ciao, hello.

Ciao caro come stai? ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Re: Ciao, hello.

Ciao caro come stai? ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Re: 答复: Original Documents

Dear Sir, We have sent you Original Documents for your shipments, Please find the attached. [1] Glass Master LLC Office: (425) 454-4844 [2] or Make A Service Request Online [3] Fax: (425) 283-5122 [4] General Contractor #: GLASSML952CA Links: -- [1] http://www.glassmasterllc.com/ [2]

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Stéphane Neveu wrote: > 2018-01-23 11:44 GMT+01:00 Raphael Hertzog : > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Stéphane Neveu wrote: > >> Many thanks for your work. > >> May I ask you to add me : stefek-guest ? > > > > Sure but there is no such account on

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Stéphane Neveu wrote: > Many thanks for your work. > May I ask you to add me : stefek-guest ? Sure but there is no such account on salsa.debian.org. Please create one first. :-) (or maybe validate it I don't know) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

Hi Raphael, Many thanks for your work. May I ask you to add me : stefek-guest ? Regards, Stephane 2018-01-22 22:47 GMT+01:00 Phil. : > Thank you Raphaël for all this work. > > Can you please add my account : Philou-guest ? > > Cheers ! > -- > O Philippe Thierry. > /Y\/

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Phil. wrote: > Can you please add my account : Philou-guest ? Done. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

Thank you Raphaël for all this work. Can you please add my account : Philou-guest ? Cheers ! -- O Philippe Thierry. /Y\/ GPG: 7010 9a3c e210 763e 6341 4581 c257 b91b cdaf c1ea o#o (sent from my smartphone)___ forensics-devel mailing list

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Samuel Henrique wrote: > I'll need access ​to the team: samueloph-guest Done. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

​Thanks for your work I'll need access ​to the team: samueloph-guest -- Samuel Henrique ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Processed: Re: rkhunter should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

Processing control commands: > severity -1 minor Bug #887210 [rkhunter] rkhunter should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal' -- 887210: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887210 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Switch to salsa, the good time to merge forensics and pkg-security?

2018-01-09 23:45 GMT+08:00 Raphael Hertzog : > Hello everybody, > > in the following weeks I will likely work on switching pkg-security from > alioth to salsa. I will request a new mailing list on lists.debian.org. > > Since this is a relatively disruptive change that is

Re: Switch to salsa, the good time to merge forensics and pkg-security?

> in the following weeks I will likely work on switching pkg-security from > alioth to salsa. I will request a new mailing list on lists.debian.org. ack! G. ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Switch to salsa, the good time to merge forensics and pkg-security?

* Raphael Hertzog [Tue Jan 09, 2018 at 04:45:39PM +0100]: > in the following weeks I will likely work on switching pkg-security from > alioth to salsa. I will request a new mailing list on lists.debian.org. > Since this is a relatively disruptive change that is imposed on both > teams sooner or

Re: Switch to salsa, the good time to merge forensics and pkg-security?

​As someone who contributed to both teams (more to pkg-sec than to forensics) and plans to keep contributing, this is a good thing to do. It will make our teams stronger and the packaging/support for both better.​ ​I can also help with the switch, if needed/possible.​ -- Samuel Henrique

RE

Good day, Contact us for a 3% interest rate business/personal loans today. To apply, email me with your Full Names:.. Loan Amount Needed: *Pay Back Duration:. Regards. CCLC Int. the from name na CCLC Int ___

Processed: Re: Bug#873374: libtsk13 4.4.2-1 crash in the dfvfs test suite

Processing control commands: > reassign 873374 python-tsk Bug #873374 [libtsk13] libtsk13 4.4.2-1 crash in the dfvfs test suite Bug reassigned from package 'libtsk13' to 'python-tsk'. No longer marked as found in versions sleuthkit/4.4.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #873374

RE: PAYMENT OF $USD10,900,000.00M INTO YOUR ACCOUNT:...

Atten: Beneficiary, RE: PAYMENT OF $USD10,900,000.00M INTO YOUR ACCOUNT: We received a Signal from FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK Head Office that the fund being transferred from ALPHA BANK PCL To BANK of AMERICA worth $USD10,900,000.00M in your name is being put on hold due

Re: Wheezy update of rkhunter?

On 2017-07-02 at 16:46:40, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Wheezy version of rkhunter: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-7480 > > Would you like to take care of this yourself? I'm thinking

Processed: Re: Bug#865782: yara: CVE-2017-9465

Processing control commands: > forcemerge 864517 865782 Bug #864517 [src:yara] CVE-2017-9465 Bug #865782 [src:yara] yara: CVE-2017-9465 Bug #865782 [src:yara] yara: CVE-2017-9465 Merged 864517 865782 -- 864517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864517 865782:

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

Hi all, Sorry for the delay to return, I'm very busy this week. Em 19-06-2017 13:47, Michael Prokop escreveu: >> Can you have a look at the package? Everything's on git, if you don't have >> time i can ask for someone from the pkg-sec team. I can review/sponsor your upload next weekend, Samuel.

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

* Samuel Henrique [Sat Jun 17, 2017 at 09:13:38PM -0300]: > Ok, now that the freeze is over, i should ask for an upload again, since we > already shipped stretch with grokevt 2+ years outdated :( > Eriberto said he couldn't sponsor my uploads anymore, and since i've got no > response from the

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

2017-06-18 3:29 GMT-03:00 Henri Salo : > Do you mean old or actually outdated? :) ​both, grokevt 0.5.0 was released 6 years ago, its packaging were blocked due to a dependency problem that was fixed by Giovani some time ago on the stretch development cycle and i went ahead and

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 09:13:38PM -0300, Samuel Henrique wrote: > already shipped stretch with grokevt 2+ years outdated :( Do you mean old or actually outdated? :) -- Henri Salo ___ forensics-devel mailing list

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

Ok, now that the freeze is over, i should ask for an upload again, since we already shipped stretch with grokevt 2+ years outdated :( Eriberto said he couldn't sponsor my uploads anymore, and since i've got no response from the list from my last email, i'm cc'ing Giovani this time. Can you have

Re: Bug#854490: RFP: xva-img -- Citrix XenServer .xva disk extraction tool

Hi, Axel Beckert wrote: > * URL or Web page : https://github.com/eriklax/xva-img > * License : GPL-2+ JFTR: I'm currently working on an initial packaging for xva-img (should show up soon at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/xva-img.git) and Lintian made me aware of the

Re:

Good Day, Been waiting to hear from you concerning my last mail so I can give you more information. Mr. Su Liie ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#853935: rephrase: No more works with gpg2 and causes one pinentry popup per guess

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #853935 [rephrase] rephrase: No more works with gpg2 and causes one pinentry popup per guess Added tag(s) patch. -- 853935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: Bug#853935: rephrase: No more works with gpg2 and causes one pinentry popup per guess

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - patch Bug #853935 [rephrase] rephrase: No more works with gpg2 and causes one pinentry popup per guess Removed tag(s) patch. -- 853935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#853935: rephrase: No more works with gpg2 and causes one pinentry popup per guess

Processing control commands: > affects 853935 + src:gnupg2 Bug #853935 [rephrase] rephrase: No more works with gpg2 and causes one pinentry popup per guess Added indication that 853935 affects src:gnupg2 -- 853935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853935 Debian Bug Tracking

Processed: Re: Bug#850828: New .symbols file

Processing control commands: > reopen 850828 ! Bug #850828 {Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eribe...@debian.org>} [sleuthkit] sleuthkit: please update symbols file 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may n

Re: Proper fix for #850828

Hi Hilko, Thanks. I will review and upload it soon. Cheers, Eriberto 2017-01-11 20:52 GMT-02:00 Hilko Bengen : > Hi Eriberto, > > I have pushed a proper fix for #850828 which gets rid of all those > mangled C++ symbols and takes 32 and 64 bit architectures into account. >

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

Hi team, I've just finished preparing grokevt. Can someone sign my changes and upload? I don't have DM rights. The package is on mentors and on our git repo. Samuel Henrique ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Uploaders of grokevt

I just encountered the same with unhide. CCing MIA team, as there's a chance Christophe is MIA (didn't see any upload of him newer than ~5 years old) and he is the uploader of 21 packages. Samuel Henrique 2016-12-25 13:13 GMT-02:00 Samuel Henrique : > Hi Cristophe, > >

Processed: Re: md5deep: sudo md5deep -rel /* leads to system crash

Processing control commands: > tags 841447 moreinfo Bug #841447 [md5deep] md5deep: sudo md5deep -rel /* leads to system crash Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 841447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841447 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re

Greetings, I am Mrs. Selina Aurel, and I have a confidential Project to discuss with you. Kindly get in touch with me immediately to give you the details. Mrs. Selina Aurel.

Re: forensics-extra_1.0_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-11-08 20:00 GMT-02:00 Thorsten Alteholz : > > Hi Eriberto, > > not all packages from your Depends:-line are in main, some are missing > and some are in non-free. Those must be removed. > > Thanks! > Thorsten Hi Thorsten, Initially, thanks for your review.

Processed: Re: [ADD] volatility: Incompatible with Kernel 4.7

Processing control commands: > forwarded 839754 https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility/issues/344 Bug #839754 [volatility] volatility: Incompatible with Kernel 4.7 Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility/issues/344' from

Processed: Re: volatility: Incompatible with LiME version 1.7.5

Processing control commands: > retitle 839754 volatility: Incompatible with Kernel 4.7 Bug #839754 [volatility] volatility: Incompatible with LiME version 1.7.5 Changed Bug title to 'volatility: Incompatible with Kernel 4.7' from 'volatility: Incompatible with LiME version 1.7.5'. -- 839754:

Re: Good to finally reach you

Hello How are you? i hope all is well with you. I have tried reachiny you without luck. My client is looking for a good business to invest in your country. If you have any good business in mind please get back to me urgently so i can give you more update. We are looking at Real Estate, Spa &

Re: Statistics about Debian Forensics Team

Thanks! 2016-09-18 9:55 GMT-03:00 Samuel Henrique : > Nice work Eriberto! > > As Giovani said, this will be very helpful when dealing with our team's > packages before the freeze. ___ forensics-devel mailing list

Re: Statistics about Debian Forensics Team

Nice work Eriberto! As Giovani said, this will be very helpful when dealing with our team's packages before the freeze. Samuel Henrique 2016-09-18 5:03 GMT-03:00 Michael Prokop : > * Giovani Ferreira [Sat Sep 17, 2016 at 03:03:12PM -0300]: > > On 17-09-2016 13:14, Eriberto

Re: Statistics about Debian Forensics Team

Hi, 2016-09-18 5:03 GMT-03:00 Michael Prokop : > * Giovani Ferreira [Sat Sep 17, 2016 at 03:03:12PM -0300]: >> On 17-09-2016 13:14, Eriberto Mota wrote: > >> > Is available here[1] a daily report about Forensics Team. I believe >> > that this report will be useful to help to

Re: Statistics about Debian Forensics Team

* Giovani Ferreira [Sat Sep 17, 2016 at 03:03:12PM -0300]: > On 17-09-2016 13:14, Eriberto Mota wrote: > > Is available here[1] a daily report about Forensics Team. I believe > > that this report will be useful to help to maintain the packages in > > team. > > [1]

Re: Statistics about Debian Forensics Team

2016-09-17 15:03 GMT-03:00 Giovani Ferreira : > Hi Eriberto, > > On 17-09-2016 13:14, Eriberto Mota wrote: >> >> Is available here[1] a daily report about Forensics Team. I believe >> that this report will be useful to help to maintain the packages in >> team. >> >> [1]

Re: Statistics about Debian Forensics Team

Hi Eriberto, On 17-09-2016 13:14, Eriberto Mota wrote: > > Is available here[1] a daily report about Forensics Team. I believe > that this report will be useful to help to maintain the packages in > team. > > [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/forensics_stats.html Great job! This will

Re: scalpel 2.0+ licensing

> Yes, I got approval from Golden and Vico. When we reviewed the code > (it was a few years ago), they were the only copyright holders. I > didn’t think there is any foremost code in there. Is there? Hi Brian, Well, it was forked from an old foremost version, and the current foremost version

Re: scalpel 2.0+ licensing

Yi Yann, Yes, I got approval from Golden and Vico. When we reviewed the code (it was a few years ago), they were the only copyright holders. I didn’t think there is any foremost code in there. Is there? thanks, brian > On Aug 7, 2016, at 10:54 AM, ydir...@free.fr wrote: > > Hi Brian, >

Re: Re: Retirement of rifiuti

Hi Eriberto, thanks for your feedback! >I don't know if rifiuti can be removed now. Is rifiuti2 a full and > mature repacement for rifiuti? Can someone say about it? Comparing the man pages https://manpages.debian.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=rifiuti=0=0=Debian+unstable+sid=html=en

Re: Retirement of rifiuti

Hi Markus, Thanks for your message. I don't know if rifiuti can be removed now. Is rifiuti2 a full and mature repacement for rifiuti? Can someone say about it? The 0.7.0 version is an initial draft only (not released yet). Regards, Eriberto 2016-07-24 13:48 GMT-03:00 Dr. Markus Waldeck

Processed: Re: Bug#828614: yara: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #828614 [src:yara] yara: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 828614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

RE

Thirty Million Dollars Donated to you by Eng. Azim Premji. ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Processed: Re: Bug#826632: Updating the unhide Uploaders list

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #826633 [src:unhide.rb] Updating the unhide.rb Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. -- 826633: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826633 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#826632: Updating the unhide Uploaders list

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #826632 [src:unhide] Updating the unhide Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. -- 826632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826632 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: DebConf16?

* Raphael Hertzog [Fri Apr 08, 2016 at 11:26:14AM +0200]: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Michael Prokop wrote: > > Is anyone else from the Debian Forensics team coming to DebConf16? > Me. Great! > It might be a good time to think of restarting the discussion about a team > with a larger scope... in

Re: DebConf16?

Hi, On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Michael Prokop wrote: > Is anyone else from the Debian Forensics team coming to DebConf16? Me. It might be a good time to think of restarting the discussion about a team with a larger scope... in fact I did the first steps recently by creating a "pkg-security" team:

RE

Hello, I have a proposal for you, kindly get back to me via: mrsjingc...@hotmail.com - NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged and confidential information. All content is subject to

Processed: Re: gpart not compiled for armhf (wheezy)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 759330 wontfix Bug #759330 [gpart] gpart not compiled for armhf (wheezy) Added tag(s) wontfix. > tags 759330 upstream Bug #759330 [gpart] gpart not compiled for armhf (wheezy) Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

RE

I have a proposal for you, for details kindly email me via : mrsc...@qq.com Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.

RE

I got a donation for you, Email me for details via:: mr.ped...@qq.com Best Regards Mr. Pedro. ** This email is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the

RE: Partnership

Partnership Partnership is needed contact for details email: ian.c...@hotmail.com ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Forensics metapackage

Hi, My suggestions: 1. forensics-kit, forensics-all or similar. 2. Native package to avoid to maintain the code as upstream outside of Debian. 3. Don't add libraries and other packages that are dependencies. 4. Use a script to auto create a debian/control.NEW. You can fish information from QA

Re: Forensics metapackage

* Giovani Ferreira [Wed Nov 11, 2015 at 11:51:08PM -0200]: > I started collaborate with the Forensic Team recently. I noticed that with pleasure, thanks! :) > Viewed most various distributions with focus in the forensic, would > think, why not make a metapackage to install all forensics

Re: Forensics metapackage

Hi Eriberto, On 12-11-2015 13:53, Eriberto wrote: > > Do you already have a name for the package? I thought of forensics-core, but accept ideas. I making the package based in meta-gnome3[1], I would also suggestions about it. [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/meta-gnome3.html Cheers, --

Re: Forensics metapackage

Hi Giovani, 2015-11-11 23:51 GMT-02:00 Giovani Ferreira : > Viewed most various distributions with focus in the forensic, would > think, why not make a metapackage to install all forensics packages. IMO, a very good idea. > I can make and maintain this package. What is

RE: Good News

Van: Lanschot - Wery, Julie van Verzonden: woensdag 11 november 2015 22:23 Aan: Lanschot - Wery, Julie van Onderwerp: Good News Recipîent of a donatîon contact [ sjami...@qq.com ] for details. Op deze

Re: forensics-colorize_1.1-1_source.changes REJECTED

Sorry! Uploaded. Regards, Eriberto 2015-10-21 11:18 GMT-02:00 Debian FTP Masters : > > > Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload

Re: forensics-colorize_1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, You are right. Sorry for my mistake. Fixed and uploaded. Regards, Eriberto 2015-10-20 16:00 GMT-02:00 Thorsten Alteholz : > > Hi, > > shouldn't it be GPL-3 in your debian/copyright? > > Thanks! > Thorsten > > === > > Please feel free to respond

Processed: Re: Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4

, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed in versions afflib/3.7.6-4. -- 790975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ forensics

Processed: Re: Bug#790975: afflib: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #790975 [src:afflib] afflib: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' tag -1 confirmed Bug #790975 [src:afflib] afflib: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processed: Re: hashdeep: fails to upgrade from md5deep/experimental

Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #794045 [hashdeep] hashdeep: fails to upgrade from md5deep/experimental Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 794045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Re: Team maintenance for plaso and dependencies; jessie backports

* Hilko Bengen [Wed Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:09PM +0200]: after preparing packages for plaso and dependencies, I'd like to put the packages into the responsibility of the Debian Forensics team. I have created git repositories in the appropriate places (alioth:/git/forensics/$pkg.git) and changed

Processed: Re: Bug#790261: memdump: FTBFS: unsupported system: Linux.4.0.0-1-amd64

Processing control commands: tag -1 pending Bug #790261 [src:memdump] memdump: FTBFS: unsupported system: Linux.4.0.0-1-amd64 Added tag(s) pending. -- 790261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

RE

I have a proposal for you kindly contact me via::ms.go...@gmail.com Op deze e-mail is een disclaimer van toepassing. Deze kunt u vinden op http://www.kentalis.nl/disclaimer This e-mail is subject to a disclaimer, which can be found on

Re: Weitere Informationen Kontakt diese eMail: standardloansplccom...@gmail.com / MORE INFORMATION CONTACT THIS EMAIL: standardloansplccom...@gmail.com

Head Office Address: 16 Hanover Square, Mayfair, London W1S 1HT Branch Address: P.O box 20517 CY-3058 Limasol, Istanbul,Turkey Email: standardloansplccom...@gmail.com Haben Sie die Finanzierung benötigen? Haben Sie Geschäfts oder persönlichen Kredit? Haben Sie für Ihr Unternehmen zu

RE

I got a Proposal for you, Email me for details via::t.chen.t...@gmail.com Best Regards Mrs. Chen. DISCLAIMER: This emailed information is private and protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

Re: From favour manis

Hello Dear, Am Ms. Favour Manis,Honestly I would like to have an investment and confidential relationship with you, and to assist me receive USD$3.5Million deposited in a bank for investments purposes in your country, please email me back now so that I can give you more details and documents

Re: reporting bugs/change requests

Thanks, much appreciated On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br wrote: Hi Joachim, I am the uploader of the TSK and I will take care of this now. I will upload today to experimental to reimplement the symbols. Tomorrow, I will upload to unstable. I agree with

Re: reporting bugs/change requests

Hi Joachim, I am the uploader of the TSK and I will take care of this now. I will upload today to experimental to reimplement the symbols. Tomorrow, I will upload to unstable. I agree with the patch and both of uploads will have it. Cheers, Eriberto 2015-05-08 2:50 GMT-03:00 Joachim Metz

RE

I have a proposal for you kindly contact me at ::ms.go...@hotmail.com ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

RE:

From: Murray Jillian (WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) Sent: 29 April 2015 03:23 To: Murray Jillian (WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) Subject: 1.5 cad to you Contact: leonhirtle...@outlook.com for

Re: Business Proposal

Dear Sir, My name is Addim Williams from Ghana in West Africa. My father was a gold miner in the mining village of Ghana Tarkwa. Before his death last year, he kept 310 kilos of gold Bars and Dusts in stock. As the first Son of my father, I took in charge of my father’s business. I want to

RE: Staff and Faculty Mailbox Portal.

Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 4:49 AM Subject: Staff and Faculty Mailbox Portal. Dear : Faculty / Staff/ Student This Message is from IT SERVICE. We are presently running general faculty/staff webmail directory upgrade and cleanup. In a bid to strengthening our

RE: Gesture

From: Williams, Julie A Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 4:42 AM To: Williams, Julie A Subject: Gesture $ 8,000,000 US Dollars WAS donated to you. Please contact, Name: Mrs Kim George Email: kgeorg...@qq.commailto:kgeorg...@qq.com The information contained in this

Re: metacam issues

Hi Henri, Thanks for your report. 2015-03-03 4:36 GMT-03:00 Henri Salo he...@nerv.fi: Do we really want to have several packages in Debian, which list and/or edit EXIF data for JPEG files? IMHO, yes. I don't see any problem when maintaining several similar packages in Debian. They are

Re: metacam issues

On mar., 2015-03-03 at 09:36 +0200, Henri Salo wrote: Do you want me to report these issues to Debian bug tracking system? I was unable to find upstream issue tracker for this package and our Git URL seems to be broken according to http://duck.debian.net/static/sp/m/metacam.html Please

Re: ITP: scap-workbench -- Scanning and tailoring tool for SCAP content

Hello I am looking for a co-maintainer sponsor for this package. anyone interested in this tool ? On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 00:57 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: * Package name: scap-workbench Version : 0.8.8 I have now updated this package to the latest release (1.0.3). regards,

Re

Compliments, I have a safe, viable and verifiable business proposal for you. Please reply for a detailed information. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ___ forensics-devel mailing list

Re: Investment Funds!!!

Re: Investment Funds!!! $0 Raised   /   1 Supporters   /   58 Days Left Check It Out Dear Sir, This is a good opportunity that came up and I hope you can handle it.Now the funds we can

Re: rkhunter is marked for autoremoval from testing

* Francois Marier [Sat Nov 29, 2014 at 12:07:49AM +1300]: On 2014-11-28 at 11:08:13, Michael Prokop wrote: * Debian testing autoremoval watch [Thu Nov 27, 2014 at 04:39:04AM +]: rkhunter 1.4.2-0.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-12-19 It is affected by these RC bugs:

Re: rkhunter is marked for autoremoval from testing

Hi Mika and all! I am acting as new co-maintainer and team upload in some packages not maintained since 2011 or before. I intend to adopt some packages that was maintained by Julien and Christophe Monniez. But rkhunter is not in my current plans. But, if needed, I can try help. Regards,

Re: rkhunter is marked for autoremoval from testing

On 2014-11-28 at 12:29:53, Michael Prokop wrote: * Francois Marier [Sat Nov 29, 2014 at 12:07:49AM +1300]: On 2014-11-28 at 11:08:13, Michael Prokop wrote: * Debian testing autoremoval watch [Thu Nov 27, 2014 at 04:39:04AM +]: rkhunter 1.4.2-0.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing

Re

I am Mrs. Bozena i have a business proposal to share with you please reply ASAP for more details. Thanks. ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: Re: libewf: FTBFS on hurd-386

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 754816 20140608-1 Bug #754816 [src:libewf] libewf: FTBFS on hurd-386 Marked as found in versions libewf/20140608-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 754816:

RE: rkhunter: new upstream version

Hey, it would be nice to have a newer version of rkhunter 1.4.2 updated. http://rkhunter.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rkhunter/rkhunter/files/CHANGELOG thanks regards althaser ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#751916: Should libphash be removed?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 751916 wheezy-ignore Bug #751916 [src:libphash] Should libphash be removed? Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. Hi, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2014, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Unknown command or

Re;Get back to me soon ok

Здравствуйте, дорогие Как вы ваша семья надежда все well.Yes Я обращаюсь к Вам, чтобы помочь мне в перенося сумму $ 10,5 ЗОЛОТО на ваш банковский счет. Пожалуйста, вернуться ко мне Throug мой электронный addrress если только вы, что вы можете работать со мной. со следующими информаций для более

Re: Suggestion: move autopsy maintenance to Debian Forensics team

Hi! I looked over the new autopsy 3 (currently in 3.0.9 version)[1]. The upstream says[2]: Although Autopsy is designed to be cross-platform (Windows, Linux, MacOSX), the current version is fully functional and fully tested only on Windows. We have run it on XP, Vista, and Windows 7 with no

Re: Suggestion: move autopsy maintenance to Debian Forensics team

Hy Fabian, Thanks a lot for your message. I contacted Lorenzo (current autopsy maintainer) in february and I will evaluate the autopsy, in two or three weeks. The intent is put autopsy under Forensics Team and Lorenzo agrees. The main problem is the new autopsy versions were tested by the

Re: Suggestion: move autopsy maintenance to Debian Forensics team

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:14:53AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hy Fabian, Thanks a lot for your message. I contacted Lorenzo (current autopsy maintainer) in february and I will evaluate the autopsy, in two or three weeks. The intent is put autopsy under Forensics Team and Lorenzo agrees. The

  1   2   3   4   >