Your message dated Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:08:46 +
with message-id e1xhxme-p6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#751916: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #594954,
regarding libphash: please provide some of the examples in compiled form
to be marked
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.9.4-1.4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:19 +0200
with message-id 53d3be0f.7090...@googlemail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#746879: libphash: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #746879,
regarding libphash: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
do you propose removal from stable too or just from sid/testing?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:19:44PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
do you propose removal from stable too or just from sid/testing?
Just from sid.
Cheers,
Moritz
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 751916 wheezy-ignore
Bug #751916 [src:libphash] Should libphash be removed?
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
Hi,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2014, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Unknown command
Source: libphash
Severity: serious
- The last maintainer upload was four years ago and since then it
required five NMUs to keep up with various RC bugs with a new one
still open for GCC 4.9
- The version in the archive is outdated compared to current upstream
- Popcon is marginal
Unless
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.4-1.4
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals
Bug #746879: libphash: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
The script that generates
libphash 0.9.4-1.4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-06-14
It is affected by these RC bugs:
746879: libphash: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
Package: src:libphash
Version: 0.9.4-1.4
Severity: important
Tags: sid jessie
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.9
The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.9/g++-4.9, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.8/g++-4.8. The
severity of this report may
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.4-1.3
Current version: 0.9.4-1.4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Package: libphash
Version: 0.9.4-1.3
Followup-For: Bug #727431
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu trusty ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Use dh-autoreconf to get new libtool macros for ppc64el
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.4-1.2
Current version: 0.9.4-1.3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Source: libphash
Version: 0.9.4-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Related to current libav9 transition
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# libav transition does not affect Squeeze (abusing versioning)
found 638243 libphash/0.9.4-1
Bug #638243 {Done: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org} [libphash] Needs to be
adapted to libav/0.7.1
Bug Marked as found in versions libphash/0.9.4-1
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.4-1.1
Current version: 0.9.4-1.2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Hi Christoph,
Le vendredi 19 août 2011 à 16:10:19 (+0200 CEST), Christophe Monniez a écrit :
Le vendredi 19 août 2011 à 15:45 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit :
Hi,
I have been working on libphash to refresh the packaging and include the
patch for #638243 (tested successfully when building
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org wrote:
I'll test it next week.
Have you had a chance to test libphash?
cheers,
Julien
I'm sorry Julien, not yet.
I'll probably have time next week ... but I will not promise this time.
--
Christophe Monniez
Hi,
I have been working on libphash to refresh the packaging and include the
patch for #638243 (tested successfully when building against ffmpeg -dev
packages available in experimental).
I have also worked on adding support for multiarch.
Could someone test the result (and especially the -dev
Le vendredi 19 août 2011 à 15:45 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit :
Hi,
I have been working on libphash to refresh the packaging and include the
patch for #638243 (tested successfully when building against ffmpeg -dev
packages available in experimental).
I have also worked on adding support
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.4-1
Current version: 0.9.4-1.1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:02:36 +
with message-id e1qv56s-0001fy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#620933: fixed in libphash 0.9.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #620933,
regarding libphash: Please don't install libtool la-file in dev-package (Policy
10.2
tags 620933 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libphash (versioned as 0.9.4-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers
Luk
diff -u libphash-0.9.4/debian/control libphash-0.9.4/debian/control
--- libphash-0.9.4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 620933 + pending
Bug #620933 [libphash] libphash: Please don't install libtool la-file in
dev-package (Policy 10.2)
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
620933: http
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.0-2
Current version: 0.9.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Hi,
it seems that there is a permission problem on the git repository of
libphash.
I tried to push this debian/watch file:
version=3
http://phash.org/download/ /releases/pHash-(.+)\.tar\.gz
but it failed with this error:
error: insufficient permission for adding an object to repository
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.8.1-1
Current version: 0.9.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2010 03:47:11 +
with message-id e1od8lh-00039u...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#576895: fixed in libphash 0.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #576895,
regarding libphash: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: unable to compile ph_num_threads()
to be marked as done
Source: libphash
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| pHash.cpp: In function 'int ph_num_threads()':
| pHash.cpp:40: error: 'nt' was not declared in this scope
| pHash.cpp
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.7.2-1
Current version: 0.8.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the libphash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.7.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
31 matches
Mail list logo
