Re: extundelete 0.2.4
Le samedi 27 avril 2013 à 22:48 +0200, Elías Alejandro a écrit : Hi all, I was checking extundelete and I saw Christophe's work for 0.2.3 version (btw, thanks!!). I've imported the last upstream version 0.2.4 and made some updates. But after to create debian/changelog with something like: git-dch --debian-branch debian --id-length=7 I get all the work about 0.2.3 version. Should I remove all of them from debian/changelog file or keep them, because represents collaborative work? Also, Anybody can check this new version and then upload? :) Thanks for you help. -- Elías Alejandro From my point of view, it's up to you to decide. -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete 0.2.4
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:45:15AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: * Christophe Monniez [Mon Apr 29, 2013 at 08:41:23AM +0200]: Le samedi 27 avril 2013 à 22:48 +0200, Elías Alejandro a écrit : I was checking extundelete and I saw Christophe's work for 0.2.3 version (btw, thanks!!). I've imported the last upstream version 0.2.4 and made some updates. But after to create debian/changelog with something like: git-dch --debian-branch debian --id-length=7 I get all the work about 0.2.3 version. Should I remove all of them from debian/changelog file or keep them, because represents collaborative work? Also, Anybody can check this new version and then upload? :) From my point of view, it's up to you to decide. ACK. *I* would just keep it as it is. ok. If the package is ready for upload from your PoV I'm happy to upload it then. I think only run git-dch is pending and then upload, unless someone can check it out and help us too. I realized that lintian will be blame us because debian/changelog line 6 is a little bit long. :) and about nmu, but that last, I could fix doing Debian Forensic Team as the last writer for debian/changelog. -- Debian Forensics forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Regards, -- Elías Alejandro ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:45:08PM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote: I prefer to have an option that would permit the user to choose the directory name where to drop the undelete files. But I think that the better way is to ask the upstream author or to give him a patch. Ok, I've applied a patch. it will be like this: extundelete --restore-file 'path' --output-dir 'path' /dev/mydevice the new option is: --output-dir Please review it for then update debian directory. Also, I've sent a email to upstream author about it if he's interested to include an option to dump the recovered files, some like this patch. I still no recieve his reply. Regards, -- Elías ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
Le dimanche 24 octobre 2010 à 06:44 +0200, Elías Alejandro a écrit : Hi, On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote: - We should ask the upstream author to add an option to specify the directory where we want the files to be restored. I apologize for the delay. I had a lot work :( About it, I was trying it, and RECOVERED_FILES is created in the same place where you run extundelete (So, where ever). I think it could be skip or what do you think? Regards, -- Elías I prefer to have an option that would permit the user to choose the directory name where to drop the undelete files. But I think that the better way is to ask the upstream author or to give him a patch. -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
Hi, On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote: - We should ask the upstream author to add an option to specify the directory where we want the files to be restored. I apologize for the delay. I had a lot work :( About it, I was trying it, and RECOVERED_FILES is created in the same place where you run extundelete (So, where ever). I think it could be skip or what do you think? Regards, -- Elías ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
Hi all, On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 06:28:17PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: I'll upload extundelete as soon as you've finished packaging inside git and give me your final ACK. I've just applied a couple of commits. I think it's ready. Basically refers to dpkg-source 3.0 according [1] and closing bug #569085 furthermore appears to be lintian clean Please, could you review it. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 Regards, -- Elías Alejandro ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
* Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com [Sat Oct 16, 2010 at 11:01:54AM -0500]: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 07:36:53AM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote: Here is the new extundelete git repository, if you agree with that: http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/extundelete.git;a=summary I imported your work as one commit. I don't know if it is the common way to do that kind of stuff. Ok, I wanted update debian/changelog to close #569085 basically adding 1 line: * Initial release (Closes: #569085) but I have no permissions. Maybe other members can revise it and make the change. (seems the email list has low traffic) or Could you check it and upload it? Make sure you've an alioth account and join the forensics group so we can add you to the group to get the according permissions: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/forensics/ I'll upload extundelete as soon as you've finished packaging inside git and give me your final ACK. regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
Le jeudi 14 octobre 2010 à 16:24 +0200, Elías Alejandro a écrit : On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:53:11AM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote: We have repositories for debian forensics packages on alioth: Ok, I've recently created a git repository to my package [1] I think is similar. My id under collab-maint is: ealmdz-guest [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gpick.git;a=summary Kind regards, -- Elías Alejandro Here is the new extundelete git repository, if you agree with that: http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/extundelete.git;a=summary I imported your work as one commit. I don't know if it is the common way to do that kind of stuff. -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: extundelete
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:33:28AM +0200, Christophe Monniez wrote: Hi Elías, I saw your work on extundelete (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/extundelete/) and, as a member of the Debian Forensics team (http://alioth.debian.org/projects/forensics/), I'm interested to help in packaging this software. Are you interested in joining our team so that we can do team work on this package ? Ok, I think extundelete will be better under forensics team. Should I create a new repository on alioth? or Do I wait to join in the team? I'm sorry I'm newbie. Kind regards, -- Elías Alejandro ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
