RE: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock

On 2023/12/14 20:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >>> Sure, I will look into that. >>> >>> BTW, I didn’t have the PowerPC in hands, do you mind granting the access of >>> your >>> test environment to me to help reproduce the issue? >> >>

[patch, fortran, committed] PR112873 F2023 degree trig functions

The following has been committed per discussion in the subject PR. commit 95b70545331764c85079a1d0e1e19b605bda1456 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: Wed Dec 13 19:04:50 2023 -0800 fortran: Add degree based trig functions for F2023 PR

Re: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock

On 09/12/2023 15:39, Lipeng Zhu wrote: > This patch try to introduce the rwlock and split the read/write to > unit_root tree and unit_cache with rwlock instead of the mutex to > increase CPU efficiency. In the get_gfc_unit function, the percentage > to step into the insert_unit function is around

Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] OpenMP/OpenACC: Unordered/non-constant component offset runtime diagnostic

On 19.08.23 00:47, Julian Brown wrote: This patch adds support for non-constant component offsets in "map" clauses for OpenMP (and the equivalants for OpenACC), which are not able to be sorted into order at compile time. Normally struct accesses in such clauses are gathered together and sorted

Facebook comment

Hi, fortran@gcc.gnu.org Supercharge your brand and business's social media followers, likes, share count with the support of our team of social media influencers. We proudly hold a combined audience of 4 million followers in the United States. Your brand, business, and online posts will gain

Re: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Sure, I will look into that. > > > > BTW, I didn’t have the PowerPC in hands, do you mind granting the access of > > your > > test environment to me to help reproduce the issue? > > That's unfortunately not possible: it's

RE: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock

Hi, Thomas Schwinge wrote:   On 2023-12-14T02:28:22+, "Zhu, Lipeng" wrote: On 2023/12/14 4:52, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> I've just filed >

RE: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock

Hi Lipeng! On 2023-12-14T02:28:22+, "Zhu, Lipeng" wrote: > On 2023/12/14 4:52, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2023-12-12T02:05:26+, "Zhu, Lipeng" wrote: >> > On 2023/12/12 1:45, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:25 PM Zhu, Lipeng >> wrote: >> >> > On 2023/12/9 23:23, Jakub

Re: [committed] testsuite: Fix up target-enter-data-1.c on 32-bit targets

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:14:56 +0100 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:43:05AM +, Julian Brown wrote: > > * c-c++-common/gomp/target-enter-data-1.c: Adjust scan > > output. > > struct bar { int num_vectors; double *vectors; }; > > is 16 bytes only on 64-bit targets, on