Re: [Foundation-l] Guidelines for the use of iframes?

2012-03-15 Thread Fae
://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings * https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?oldid=79658action=edit Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Controversial content software status - the image filter disguised under a new label

2012-03-12 Thread Fae
staff and users. Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Controversial content software status - the image filter disguised under a new label

2012-03-12 Thread Fae
interest appears to be destruction rather than improvement in their ambitions to make a name for themselves by tilting at the WMF or, far worse, the open movement itself. Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe

Re: [Foundation-l] Image filter

2012-03-09 Thread Fae
sponsored air rifles. Do I win the cuddly toy? I think this thread is officially off-topic, or at least as likely to reach a new destination as a carousel. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Foundation-l] WikiQueer

2012-03-03 Thread Fae
Thanks for the clarification Greg. I'm delighted to see positive use of Wikipedia content in this way. I look forward to seeing a bit of synergy between the projects on gay related topics. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags

[Foundation-l] WikiQueer

2012-03-02 Thread Fae
://www.wikiqueer.org/w/Wikipedia 2. http://www.wikiqueer.org/w/WikiQueer:Milestones 3. http://www.wikiqueer.org/w/WikiQueer:The_Aequalitas_Project 4. http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/03/01/gay-online-encyclopaedia-debuts-today/ Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing

Re: [Foundation-l] Adding a comment section under every Wikipedia article

2012-01-22 Thread Fae
As Facebook already takes our articles for the same general chitchat reasons, it sounds like we could add a Facebook link to every article to get the same result. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags

Re: [Foundation-l] Blink tag jokes are now obsolete.

2011-12-31 Thread Fae
to spell it out in detailed guidelines. I am less sure about the animated graphic, probably not specifically against the house style. However if this were a vote, I personally would be against animated graphics in banners, they are an unsettling distraction. Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae

Re: [Foundation-l] How SOPA will hurt the free web and Wikipedia

2011-12-14 Thread Fae
retrospectively and arbitrarily misused as a statement of consensus for something else. Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] How SOPA will hurt the free web and Wikipedia

2011-12-14 Thread Fae
of the !votes were for a carte blanche to proceed with action. A consensus would have to be gained for any particular proposal. Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation

Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-12 Thread Fae
Is swearing acceptable on this email list? If so, I will unsubscribe as I would prefer not to to be surprised by offensive language in my mail box. Fae On 12 December 2011 18:59, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity - fuckin' A. Thank you

Re: [Foundation-l] WP being edited by lobbying firm

2011-12-06 Thread Fae
assessment has been completed to ensure no possible conflict of interest has compromised article neutrality. Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Who *doesn't* suffer from adminitis these days?

2011-11-07 Thread Fae
and you have to go back to admin school (not necessarily the pillory of RFA) this might be a way of making some overly bullish admins think twice about their language and impression they give newbies. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Fae
Oops, sorry Fred, On Wikipedia I have a nice acronym expanding script to make sure I don't get locked into jargon, particularly useful when explaining things to newer editors. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Fae
Hi Philippe, I use an iMacro script, which is probably pretty geeky. Someone with a bit of JavaScript knowledge could probably find a way of getting it turned into a more maintable wiki user script. Source code link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fae/Geek/fullNameOfShortcut Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] Newbie recruitment: referencing

2011-11-03 Thread Fae
template or ref tag. By the way, many of us old hands routinely give simple advice on footnotes, I have http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fae/help/refs which explains the ref tag in a very simple way, and points to other help including a demonstration video I prepared some time ago. Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] Newbie recruitment: referencing

2011-11-03 Thread Fae
not an obvious solution for new users, having a standard tool for Google books/news, WorldCat, leading newspapers etc. and possibly working with partners such as Zotero might be a useful alternative path to consider rather than limiting our thinking to the Wikipedia edit box interface. Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] [WikiEN-l] Newbie recruitment: referencing

2011-11-03 Thread Fae
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/DER and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Unreferenced_BLP_Rescue are examples that attracted many new editors Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove

2011-11-01 Thread Fae
to imagine operational processes or practices being judged as an effective use of donated funds if at the same time they blatantly failed to be efficient. I may be missing the point, perhaps someone can provide a practical counter-example? Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] the choice of what is going to be developed is very much a management issue;

2011-10-31 Thread Fae
would seem the most relevant and essential if we are to credibly judge the value of such improvements for the community and impact on content. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Foundation-l] Community consensus for software changes (Re: Show community consensus for Wikilove)

2011-10-31 Thread Fae
Hi Erik, Thanks for explaining WMF's position with respect to not needing community consensus, that is much clearer to me now. I am glad to see mutual trust mentioned. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove

2011-10-30 Thread Fae
and this would also help to keep the interface as simple as possible for the first few edits made and targeted more on article content rather than user page fluff. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove

2011-10-30 Thread Fae
enough to avoid misinterpretation in unexpected ways. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove

2011-10-30 Thread Fae
. Requests for help are probably better handled by something other than a heart icon at the top of every user talk page. I would say that the appropriately named Help link at the left of every page is more likely to be used for this. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove

2011-10-29 Thread Fae
of requirements gathering and analysis. Does your email represent the position of the WMF or the outreach team? Personally, I find arguments that we should do away with community consensus because it is too hard disturbing and run counter to our agreed mission. Thanks, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] News from Germany: White Bags and thinking about a fork

2011-10-23 Thread Fae
it in as a controversial default and take legal responsibility when it fails. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] News from Germany: White Bags and thinking about a fork

2011-10-23 Thread Fae
On 23 October 2011 12:02, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 October 2011 11:50, Fae f...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: The Foundation considers de:wp's careful and thoughtful decision to put [[:de:vulva]] on the front page of de:wp with a picture was a clear failure of community judgement

Re: [Foundation-l] News from Germany: White Bags and thinking about a fork

2011-10-23 Thread Fae
On 23 October 2011 12:38, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 October 2011 12:30, Fae f...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: ... PS clear failure looks like an opinion, not a statement of fact. Presumably this relates to an official position of the WMF? An opinion held by several staff

Re: [Foundation-l] IMDb sued for revealing actresses age

2011-10-19 Thread Fae
#IMDb. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

2011-10-19 Thread Fae
at them. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

2011-10-19 Thread Fae
Did I miss anything? Yes, could you clarify who were you trying to launch a personal attack on, or were you trying to offend everyone from a certain culture by showing how much you disrespect them? Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation

Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

2011-10-18 Thread Fae
Sorry to take a tangential point from Tom's email, but is the random article tool truly random or does it direct to only stable articles or some other sub-set of article space? Thanks Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

2011-10-18 Thread Fae
actually have an easy to use complaints button on the page so it's not that surprising. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

2011-10-18 Thread Fae
in comparison to all the other problems they complain about, such as my article was unfairly deleted or everyone is so unfriendly or someone put cookies on my page, why do you support cannabis use (yeah, that's a real one). Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing

Re: [Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

2011-10-18 Thread Fae
the feedback tool to complain about NSFW articles? As much as 2% of all feedback or less because the feedback tool does not give you that as an option? Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Foundation-l] The image filter: Thoughts on the German/English question

2011-10-14 Thread Fae
charitable purpose. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

2011-10-11 Thread Fae
in staying subscribed to it. Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

2011-10-11 Thread Fae
worded deletion requests on Commons on the basis of a potentially useable image being orphaned rather than it being unrealistic to expect it to ever be used for an educational purpose. Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

2011-10-09 Thread Fae
suspect that any proposal for change will be strongly resisted and continue to divide our community until well understood and well communicated facts underpin the board's resolution rather than personal belief. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list

Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter

2011-09-23 Thread Fae
to the most challenging images without context. If the WMF were to recommend such a solution for schools or religious groups, we might run into some immediate complaints. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe

Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter

2011-09-23 Thread Fae
charitable monies without budgets or accounts concern me greatly. Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter

2011-09-23 Thread Fae
On 23 September 2011 21:44, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 16:27, Fae f...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Such school and safesearch variations already exist. Why waste donor's money creating more? Note that more than 50% of money comes from US and that it could

Re: [Foundation-l] A possible solution for the image filter

2011-09-22 Thread Fae
involvement none, thus avoiding the obvious pitfall of setting itself against 50%+ of open movement supporters. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter

2011-09-22 Thread Fae
not want to start hiding paragraphs that include difficult words such as paedophile, particularly when they are likely to be accurate and verifiable even for articles likely to be accessed by young readers. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list

Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter - magical flying unicorn pony that s***s rainbows

2011-09-21 Thread Fae
community from that point on. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter - magical flying unicorn pony that s***s rainbows

2011-09-21 Thread Fae
issues. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

2011-09-19 Thread Fae
imagine images of many 18th century paintings or depictions of gods being excluded due to nude female breasts and one would have to exclude all photographs of ancient Egyptian mummies as they were all mutilated as part of the process for embalming. Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

2011-09-19 Thread Fae
/Category:Mummies Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

2011-09-19 Thread Fae
anyone who has common sense can take Wikipedia for free and hack it about in their own time and cash in by selling it to schools that would like to benefit from a *guaranteed* child friendly and religiously tolerant (out of date) version. Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

2011-09-19 Thread Fae
children. * http://schools-wikipedia.org/wp/m/Mummy.htm * http://schools-wikipedia.org/images/150/15070.png.htm * http://schools-wikipedia.org/images/893/89336.jpg.htm * http://schools-wikipedia.org/images/925/92551.jpg.htm Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

2011-09-16 Thread Fae
What a strange assumption from Peter. I don't believe for one minute that WMF would commission a global referendum and then ignore the results. If there has been an official statement along these lines I would love to be pointed to it. Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

2011-09-16 Thread Fae
in question? Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] 86% of German speakers v the Foundation re an unknown system

2011-09-16 Thread Fae
through another round. Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced

2011-09-15 Thread Fae
Is there a link somewhere to the total budget and actual staff costs of the referendum? Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced

2011-09-15 Thread Fae
Fae wrote: Is there a link somewhere to the total budget and actual staff costs of the referendum? This was asked very early on: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Image_filter_referendum/Archive1#Cost Sorry, not the same question as expected costs of implementation. I am asking

Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced

2011-09-15 Thread Fae
to commission several more on an improved basis if they can run so cheaply. Thanks, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] PG rating

2011-09-13 Thread Fae
any potential restriction as a direct challenge to the open movement. Cheers, Fae ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] PG rating

2011-09-13 Thread Fae
and for children to ask about). The piece of stale bread has never been interpreted as anything else but an artistic depiction of sexual intercourse, should one introduce PG certificate style protection for children (or schools), it would doubtless include this object too. Cheers, Fae

Re: [Foundation-l] How to free something from Wikipedia in the public domain?

2011-08-26 Thread Fae
the named accounts for the original Wikipedia article then release to PD is no problem, in practice few articles only have a history of contributors who are using accounts associated with their legal identities. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags

Re: [Foundation-l] a funny story about wikipedia's strange power

2011-08-24 Thread Fae
Agreed, this thread is definitely deceased ... following a prolonged squawk. Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https

[Foundation-l] Question: Guidelines with regard to topics suitable for Geonotices

2011-07-30 Thread Fae
on how it can be used or expectations for how it should be used and who ought to have final responsibility for the nature of the content of such geographically related notices. Thanks, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags

Re: [Foundation-l] NPG still violating copyright

2011-06-13 Thread Fae
Nicely done Liam, thanks. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags On 14 June 2011 02:53, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote: Scott, the director of rights and reproductions a the NPG kindly wrote directly back to me very quickly and said

Re: [Foundation-l] Request: WMF commitment as a long term cultural archive?

2011-06-03 Thread Fae
how this is planned for in operation practice if it has yet to be detailed (i.e. not just a backup procedure but strategically planning for perpetuity). Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags ___ foundation

[Foundation-l] Request: WMF commitment as a long term cultural archive?

2011-06-02 Thread Fae
can point to that includes, say, a 10 year or 100 commitment? If it exists, this would be a key factor for researchers choosing where to share their images with the public. Thanks, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags

Re: [Foundation-l] Request: WMF commitment as a long term cultural archive?

2011-06-02 Thread Fae
Wikimedia Commons is not the right place for a full donation and a more specialized database host is needed. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Foundation-l] Request: WMF commitment as a long term cultural archive?

2011-06-02 Thread Fae
remaining cache snapshots and independent global archive sites run to over 2 years of work. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags On 2 June 2011 18:27, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 June 2011 14:21, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [Foundation-l] Request: WMF commitment as a long term cultural archive?

2011-06-02 Thread Fae
that there might be something in existence. It sounds like an area of the mission that would be reasonable to translate into direct operational targets (say, a pragmatic 10 or 20 year plan). Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags On 2 June 2011 19:28, phoebe

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia at events

2011-06-01 Thread Fae
and that were so easy to maintain that no country would want to go off on a tangent to use their own system to coordinate what events they were involved with. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags ___ foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia at events

2011-06-01 Thread Fae
I had in mind something like an independent site or open source tool that uses some easy way of updating an iCal format page per Chapter. This can then be actively pulled into many types of application that handle such feeds including Google Calendar. Cheers, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae