???
Hubertl
Am 12.03.2012 16:43, schrieb Nathan:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance. It's
best ignored, along with the people who use it.
___
Am 12.03.2012 18:02, schrieb Marc Riddell:
on 3/12/12 11:43 AM, Nathan at nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance. It's
best ignored, along with the people who use
Thank you for your information:
But I´m not able to enter the refering link.
http://board.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapters_fundraising/Guiding_Principles
hubertl
Am 18.01.2012 09:25, schrieb Ting Chen:
Hello dear community,
the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation passed the following
Am 18.01.2012 12:48, schrieb Pronoein:
Le 18/01/2012 05:25, Ting Chen a écrit :
Hello dear community,
the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation passed the following
resolution with seven approves and three abstains:
[...]
* Minimal cost and minimal disruption. All Wikimedia
I fully agree!
h
Am 02.01.2012 17:53, schrieb James Heilman:
The fundraiser for money has been working exceedingly well with our
number of donors increasing 10 fold since 2008. What we need now is a
fundraiser for editors. I meet well educated professionals who use
Wikipedia but have no ideas
Feedbacks and Experts for websites are evil.
1. It costs a lot of money
2. Nobody will analyse it really
3. the type of questioning determines the results
4. It is only good for people who want to take no responsibility for
their own work.
5. last but not least, no one will implement the
I love it, even when I don´t understand one word!
Great Idea!
h
Am 04.12.2011 02:04, schrieb Tomasz Ganicz:
Hi,
Copernicus Sience Center from Warsaw:
http://www.kopernik.org.pl/en/
Has just started a wbesite called singing Wikipedia
http://www.famelab.org.pl/
The idea is that anyone
thats fine, and in the future, with spoken wikipedia articles, we don´t
need any real parliament with living persons any more. We will accept,
that only at the end of this automatic sessions the licence will be
presented.
Grants to WMF are appreciated.
h
Am 19.11.2011 09:39, schrieb
hi David, what you wrote fits exactly my experience!
Today, my opinion is, that we must focus our efforts on a small portion
of Internet users. It is not that WE just do something very great,
everyone is doing something! In very different ways. Maybe even Facebook
users are doing something
Am 31.10.2011 18:34, schrieb Erik Moeller:
The partnership between WMF and the community is founded on mutual
trust. If you don't trust WMF, you can - and probably should -
contribute your effort elsewhere, because WMF may - and probably will
- do things you won't like.
HTH,
Erik
If
We have the ability to strike back with our means
Lockout of all the IP addresses of companies, institutions, members of
Congress. All to the Blacklist of our site.
This includes all educational institutions and religious groups who
profess not an implicit model of an open knowledge society.
One problem is that the word Love is used quite differently in the
German language. Even in Great Britain.
Love as a term is used in English in a fully inflated notion of flooding.
I have no idea what lovers say to each other in the U.S. when it comes
to really love.
Maybe they just grunt at
thank you!
h
Am 29.10.2011 13:31, schrieb FT2:
Having checked the original blog
posthttp://suegardner.org/2011/09/28/on-editorial-judgment-and-empathy/,
I think it's either a rare exception of poorly chosen wording, or shows a
judgment within WMF that I can't agree with.
I remember when
And after this procedure, we all expect, that some readers may become
edtitors?
Good Luck!
I hope and expect, that wikipedia could help, that people become more
educated.
The more educated people are, the less important this filters will be.
this should be our goal.
not patronizing readers in
. And this individuals should deny any public schools for their
children.
And I mean this not in a depreciatory way. Maybe, this may be a better
world.
I just hope, they will even throw the bible then.
h.
Am 10.10.2011 20:37, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
Hubert,
The fact is that the English word violence has
Am 10.10.2011 21:16, schrieb Sue Gardner:
On 10 October 2011 11:56, Möller, Carsten c.moel...@wmco.de wrote:
Sue wrote:
It is asking me to do something.
But it is not asking me to do the specific thing that has
been discussed over the past several months, and which the Germans
voted
+1
h
Am 11.10.2011 03:20, schrieb Bjoern Hoehrmann:
* Sue Gardner wrote:
This is how the system is supposed to work. The Board identified a
problem; the staff hacked together a proposed solution, and we asked
the community what it thought. Now, we're responding to the input and
we're going
dear Anneke,
+1
and see the basic difference and the disaccordance in understanding and
meaning of violence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence
hubertl.
Am 09.10.2011 16:35, schrieb Anneke Wolf:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gewalt
Anneke
Am 09.10.2011 um 16:12 schrieb Ting Chen:
Am 09.10.2011 16:56, schrieb Thomas Dalton:
On 9 October 2011 15:12, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote:
the text of the May resolution to this question is ... and that the
feature be visible, clear and usable on all Wikimedia projects for both
logged-in and logged-out readers, and on the
Wikipedians, even within the German Wikipedia,
there are significant cultural differences.
And violence is - contrary to religion and sexuality - just the smaller
problem.
h
Am 10.10.2011 12:22, schrieb David Gerard:
On 10 October 2011 11:17, Hubert hubert.la...@gmx.at wrote:
Am 09.10.2011 16:35
20 matches
Mail list logo
