Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove

2011-10-29 Thread Nickanc Wikipedia
IMHO, Wikilove is something so important about wikipedia's ethics and behaviour that shall be in every wiki. IMHO. 2011/10/29 WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com: Message: 1 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:31:07 -0700 From: Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l]

Re: [Foundation-l] Given that we have won, can we turn Italian Wikipedia back on now?

2011-10-23 Thread Nickanc Wikipedia
very often in italian history, italian politicians use to postpone votings. This is tactics: when people gets angry for a law proposal, they delay its approval saying we trust you, with the hope that later people wouldnt notice the law proposal. About this law this has already happened: it was

Re: [Foundation-l] Blackout at Italian Wikipedia

2011-10-15 Thread Nickanc Wikipedia
Grazie! :) 2011/10/13 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com: Nickanc Wikipedia, 12/10/2011 14:21: Yes, there are these groups, but in most wikipedias they have few persons inside it and they have almost no policy; That's because few people need it. In it wiki basta una riga in [[WP:RA

Re: [Foundation-l] Blackout at Italian Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread Nickanc Wikipedia
: Nickanc Wikipedia, 10/10/2011 22:59: Why dont allow Ip block exemptions for TOR when wikipedians are strongly biased by local laws? This is already possible on all wikis with ipblock-exempt group and is/was used mainly for Chinese wikipedians AFAIK. Everybody happily editing on clandestinity

Re: [Foundation-l] Blackout at Italian Wikipedia

2011-10-10 Thread Nickanc Wikipedia
Ilario writes: We have two ways: to be passive or to be active. If we choose the passivity, it means that we can only organize a system of proxies like done in China or to organize some workarounds to make Wikipedia available to the person living in totalitarism. The Italian