Sasa Zeman wrote:
FPC can be comparable with command line compiler of Delphi 7.
Yes? So Delphi has multi platform support and has maintainable compiler
sources?
Multi platform support was not an issue here.
O, you were not comparing to fpc (from www.freepascal.org)? Because that
Sasa Zeman wrote:
FPC can be comparable with command line compiler of Delphi 7.
Yes? So Delphi has multi platform support and has maintainable compiler
sources?
Multi platform support was not an issue here.
No? Most of fpc's complexity is caused by this. Just compare the speed and
memory
On 17 apr 2006, at 23:37, Tomas Hajny wrote:
You can still sell CDs
with the compiled version (and offer paid
support, etc.), but at the same time, you must
make the sources freely available to anybody.
Actually, even then you would only have to make the source available
to the people that
EDO is more museum exponat and price is 10 times larger than the same memory
size SD-RAM. The used memory is one module 128MB SD-RAM (PC100). I've manage
to found only one 256MB module available on market with price of 50Euro, but
only incompatible PC133.
No, PC133 is backwards
Marco van de Voort wrote:
EDO is more museum exponat and price is 10 times larger than the same memory
size SD-RAM. The used memory is one module 128MB SD-RAM (PC100). I've manage
to found only one 256MB module available on market with price of 50Euro, but
only incompatible PC133.
No, PC133
On 18 apr 2006, at 03:38, Sasa Zeman wrote:
It seem that you missunderstood. As a developer, I'm not interested in
looking FPC code nor tracking future plans (details are alse never
published, only future plans), but using it to create working
applications.
In that case, you cannot make
Marco van de Voort wrote:
EDO is more museum exponat and price is 10 times larger than the same
memory
size SD-RAM. The used memory is one module 128MB SD-RAM (PC100). I've
manage
to found only one 256MB module available on market with price of 50Euro,
but
only incompatible
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
EDO is more museum exponat and price is 10 times larger than the same
memory
size SD-RAM. The used memory is one module 128MB SD-RAM (PC100). I've
manage
to found only one 256MB module available on market with price of 50Euro,
but
only
In that case, you cannot make any sort of demands or set our
priorities. You can voice your opinion of course (which you did), but
Please do not mis-interprete. I'm aware that any meber of FPC can be a bit
more sensitive, but that is not a reson for inpropriate behavior instead of
cultural
On 18 apr 2006, at 12:49, Sasa Zeman wrote:
With free and opensource product you made a trade with voluniers
and users
to make a reliable and popular product, based on your own (i.e, FPC
team)
vision and user's requests. I can suggest features which suits to
my own
needs (declared as a
Is there any easy way to create big array of constants?
Does it matter (with maximum optimizations switches), if my 50 Kb array is
defined as constant?
That is: are there benefits from defining heavily used array as const versus
defining it as variable and filling data by program?
(For
From: Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since I testing FPC and Lazarus, I'm intersting in using it.
However, FPC and Lazarus currently cannot be competition
to Delphi/Kylix. But the most important advantages are daily
updates and upgrades and we hope it
will become worthy competitor one
The problem was when you kept insisting that the compiler wastes
memory and should be optimized (with a target of 128MB physical
Please read all carfully, you mis-interpreting whole thing again.
If you want more developers in the team, simply yes or not is not enough.
Explain how else to know
Sasa Zeman wrote:
From: Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since I testing FPC and Lazarus, I'm intersting in using it.
However, FPC and Lazarus currently cannot be competition
to Delphi/Kylix. But the most important advantages are daily
updates and upgrades and we hope it
will become worthy
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Sasa Zeman wrote:
From: Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since I testing FPC and Lazarus, I'm intersting in using it.
However, FPC and Lazarus currently cannot be competition
to Delphi/Kylix. But the most important advantages are daily
updates and upgrades and we hope it
Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2006, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Sasa Zeman:
FPC and Lazarus are currently not sutable as a main tool RAD (at least on
Winodows). If you have Delphi (7) Studio licensed RAD and developing
commercial applications, you have seen real RAD tool in action:
That depends on the
HI,
I think that we all agree now and we should close this thread.
Alain
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 16:04 +0200, Sasa Zeman wrote:
The problem was when you kept insisting that the compiler wastes
memory and should be optimized (with a target of 128MB physical
Please read all carfully, you
Hi,
I think that we all agree now and we should close that thread.
Alain
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 19:22 +0200, Sasa Zeman wrote:
Please do not come all the way here just to tell us that Lazarus is
not suitable as a RAD tool. This is typical Troll behavior.
You people are really odd...
For a quick start I did the following:
for file in /data/subversion/svn/jcl/source/common/*.pas
/data/subversion/svn/jcl/source/unix/*.pas ; do fpc -FE.
-Fu/data/subversion/svn/jcl/source/common/
-Fi/data/subversion/svn/jcl/source/ $file 21 ; done | grep -i Error |
sort | uniq
This tries
me the creeps because my last lines of assembler code were written 15
years ago
Start with adding -Sd to the compiler command line. Putting the compiler in
delphi mode might help:-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Hello ,
NetBSD is not on fpc's list of supported operating systems, although there
is an older version available (1.0.10) which works fine, at least for my
purposes.
I've tried to compile the latest sources (svn), but :
system.pp(23,6) Error: Illegal unit name: SYSTEM
systemh.inc(26,4) Fatal:
If you really want to make Free Pascal / Lazarus better you should go
with specific topics, and discuss what would be a solution to improve
each small parts where you consider Delphi to be better then Lazarus.
That is exactly almost literally counted in the first message of the thread.
Taking
Disadvantages of Delphi:
2. It's closed source, if it's buggy you're lost.
Main problems comes from RTL and VCL, not a compiler - it is
stable, at least for D7. As D7 Pro+ comes with RTL and VCL sources, it is
easy to fix and recompile both. And there is many excelent free and
OpenSource
PS. I hoped that this thread will die and I will not waste my time, but
it is alive and I can't hold myself and do write an answer.
To be on topic, I just want to share my thoughts (they do probably differ
from yours), ended with not choosing Lazarus (but I trace its
development a little). I am
MSEgui has a distinct advantage over Lazarus. It compiles under Delphi. Just
tried it. Fiddled with one or two lines in the code, but I got the IDE to
compile and run and then built a small hello world app that also ran. Pretty
impressive really.
M
Hi,
Movie:
=
For those who did not
MSEgui has a distinct advantage over Lazarus. It compiles under Delphi. Just
tried it. Fiddled with one or two lines in the code, but I got the IDE to
compile and run and then built a small hello world app that also ran. Pretty
impressive really.
And the exe's/elf's it generates are
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 17:24, L505 wrote:
sense to me.). Or maybe you mean a foundation, like a non-profit
organization? Obviously FPC is not out for profit, but out to help
the developer. So I can see a non-profit organization working - but
this would mean that FPC team would spend more
27 matches
Mail list logo
