Re: Re[9]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-26 Thread Peter Vreman
These are pretty big when taken together. ... ... An optional downloadable package would probably make more sense though. Yes. Hint, link and package/link to smallest possible set of libraries would be better. I am not experienced with many things, so this was pretty confusing (can't find

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-26 Thread Peter Vreman
I hope you can see the difference between a linker, which is needed no matte how you want to use the compiler, and a tool like Valgrind or gprof. VS With this difference, compiling -gv succeeds, even if Valgrind is not VS installed. Compiling -pg fails, if gprof/cygwin is not installed.

Re[11]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-26 Thread Пётр Косаревский
Yes. Hint, link and package/link to smallest possible set of libraries would be better. I am not experienced with many things, so this was pretty confusing (can't find -lc --- maybe I'd decipher libc, but -...). The compiler can also generate code for e.g. FreeBSD,Darwin and Linux.