I give additional details. I write
programs for mathematical linguistics. Especially program for frequency
dictionary of chosen text. I write text to the editor. The text is in Czech. It
displays correctly in editor window , i.e. with diacritics. Then follows
transformation into words. In
Andreas Berger wrote:
I am using the v20 base compiler
The only supported bootstrapping compiler is the last release compiler, i.e.
2.0.2.
with the v21 source. It should create a
v21 compiler.
I get the same error compiling under DOS, Win98 and Win2K
Regards, Andreas
Lee, John
For all those Apache and CGI gurus...
[This might be off-topic]
I have written a CGI app for my client that decrypts a Macromedia
Flash files (*.swf) to a set path and name (/flash/movie.swf), I
then generate a html file to view that file, and the client (web
browser) gets served. The average
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being
complete yet (it just covers a basic parallel construct), nor is it
really thought through yet, but well, it might be a start; something to
begin with.
Any suggestions are welcome, of course.
Does
On 7/26/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are processed at the same time. Apache works threaded, so multiple
versions of your CGI script could be running at the same time. You could
simply have used the GetTempFileName function from SysUtils to avoid
concurrency problems.
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being
complete yet (it just covers a basic parallel construct), nor is
it really thought through yet, but well, it might be a start;
something to
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being
complete yet (it just covers a basic parallel construct), nor is
it really thought through
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Does parallel mean all the statements in the block can be executed in
parallel, or that multiple copies of the block of statements can be
started in parallel ?
The latter.
Strange. How many copies ?
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:07, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Does parallel mean all the statements in the block can be executed
in parallel, or that multiple copies of the block of statements
can be started in
Micha Nelissen schreef:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Does parallel mean all the statements in the block can be executed in
parallel, or that multiple copies of the block of statements can be
started in parallel ?
The latter.
Strange. How many
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:07, Micha Nelissen wrote:
How many copies ?
Omp.Get_Num_Threads(), AFAICS.
Ah the number of threads is determined by the RTL, and any parallel
block must be written flexible, so that it can work for any given number
of threads ?
Micha
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from
being complete yet (it just covers a
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Which is why I think that it's better to have them as local functions,
instead of having to introduce a lot of new functions.
Local functions are very pascal-ish. C doesn't have it, which is why they can't
use it.
Let's use the language features to their full extent.
Steve Williams wrote:
*begin*
SubTask(x);
*end* /{Sub}/;
*var*
arr = *array*[0 .. ] *of* Float;
*begin* / // Main program/
Sub (arr);
*end*.
Damn Thunderbird.
--
Sly
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:25, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:07, Micha Nelissen wrote:
How many copies ?
Omp.Get_Num_Threads(), AFAICS.
Ah the number of threads is determined by the RTL, and any parallel
block must be written flexible, so
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Andreas Berger wrote:
I am using the v20 base compiler
The only supported bootstrapping compiler is the last release compiler, i.e.
2.0.2.
That is what I am using.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being
complete yet (it just covers a basic parallel construct), nor is
it
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The latter.
Which is why I think that it's better to have them as local functions,
instead of having to introduce a lot of new functions.
There is no real reason to restrict 'parallel' to local functions, is
there ?
Micha
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:28, Steve Williams wrote:
Steve Williams wrote:
*begin*
SubTask(x);
*end* /{Sub}/;
*var*
arr = *array*[0 .. ] *of* Float;
*begin* / // Main program/
Sub (arr);
*end*.
Damn Thunderbird.
Well, it tried to mimic my syntax
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The latter.
Which is why I think that it's better to have them as local functions,
instead of having to introduce a lot of new functions.
There is no real reason to restrict 'parallel' to local functions, is
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
It seems obvious to me that a global function can be called in
parallel at any time. The compiler can perfectly detect whether a
global function writes to variables outside it's own scope, in which
case it's probably a no-no to
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
It seems obvious to me that a global function can be called in
parallel at any time. The compiler can perfectly detect whether a
global function writes to variables outside it's own
Andreas Berger wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Andreas Berger schreef:
Andreas Berger wrote:
I have a problem compiling the compiler. After a lot of compilation
it attempts to compile pp.pas and I get the following error:
pp.pas(213,1) Error: Entrypoint start not defined.
I downloaded
Fria Martin Mgr wrote:
I give additional details. I write programs for mathematical linguistics.
Especially program for frequency dictionary of chosen text. I write text
to the editor. The text is in Czech. It displays correctly in editor
window , i.e. with diacritics. Then follows
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 10:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 09:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
It seems obvious to me that a global function can be called in
parallel at any time. The compiler can perfectly detect
What other details should I give for somebody to give me advice.
I guess this might be enough for somebody to try - I personally have
absolutely no idea what kind of charset is used/expected when printing via
Write(Ln) to Lst under Windows, but this shouldn't be difficult to check?
Do
I just wanted to say I LOVE the fact that the compiler warns you of these
mundane details.
Personally, I don't consider my application at a good stopping point unless
I can make all the warnings go away. Sometimes I even will put in (hopefully
a low overhead thing when I do it) a meaningless
I have tested the FPC supplied MySQL4 unit and I've admittedly haven't had a
ton of time to play with it yet. But I was curious if any of you had any
feedback about it.
I wrote a wrapper for the FPC supplied MySQL3 a long time ago and it worked
awesome. I think I should do the same for MySQL4,
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Jason P Sage wrote:
I have tested the FPC supplied MySQL4 unit and I've admittedly haven't had a
ton of time to play with it yet. But I was curious if any of you had any
feedback about it.
I wrote a wrapper for the FPC supplied MySQL3 a long time ago and it worked
Hi,
It's me again. I was wondering if anyone has run into a problem
where programs that used the CRT unit and have worked for both Linux and
win32 find that these same programs no longer work on newer lynx's?
I have this whole suite of code - literally megs of source code that works
on
MyVariable:=MyVariable; // this is a workaround in rare cases.
Can anybody that knowns the internals of FPC confirm if this will
create extra work/code for the compiler? I have been trying for a
long time to figure out a clean way of getting rid of some compiler
warnings.
Regards,
Graeme.
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 12:49, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
MyVariable:=MyVariable; // this is a workaround in rare cases.
Can anybody that knowns the internals of FPC confirm if this will
create extra work/code for the compiler?
It does create an assignment. At least with the fpc2.0.2
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
MyVariable:=MyVariable; // this is a workaround in rare cases.
Can anybody that knowns the internals of FPC confirm if this will
create extra work/code for the compiler?
It will.
I have been trying for a
long time to figure out a clean
Jason P Sage wrote:
A good example is that FreeVision and the FPC IDE do not work on my Linux
either.
Elaborate on do not work please ?
Micha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
34 matches
Mail list logo
