Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Пётр Косаревский
I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking of bigger applications, I don't see much difference between 6 or 30 Mb executables...

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking of bigger applications, I don't see much

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking of bigger applications, I don't see much

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote: On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote: On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC.

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, L505 wrote: On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. KOL

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, L505 wrote: Very nice compact stringlist in there to use... Standard Classes stringlist adds about 60K-70K to your exe/elf while CompactUtils PStrList only adds maybe 1-5KB. Please compare what is comparable: The Classes unit contains more than just the