Vinzent H?fler Probably you should used a packed record, though. And it's
in no
Vinzent H?fler way portable, of course.
Also correct.
Jonas
I use
{$A-}
abc= record
something: byte;
case byte of
1: (a,b: byte);
2: (c: word);
end;
{$A+} // or even a: byte;
Yes, there is a language feature called object orientation. But still
that means you would have to translate the binary structure into a
class instance somehow.
Vinzent.
The object I presented compiles well, but there is almost no gain in OO
approach: I still have to nest structures and
On 20 sep 2006, at 13:20, Пётр Косаревский wrote:
I'm vague: for the first time I hoped that when you access the
variant part, if the case variable was named, program checks it
run-time. Hoping that it was implemented this way, I asked about
control over the relative place in the memory
About contributing: is it useful to comment some parts of documentation (html
with comments) with improvements, corrections or compilable examples?
It's not because you don't pay me, or because you cannot demand
anything from me or anyone else working on FPC, that you do not have
Yes, you do. :)
Nevertheless
some_type = record
case Something : byte of
1: (x,y: word);
2: (z: longword);
end;
Thank you, Jonas and Vincent, but I was vague: what I want is blockread'ing, so
I have to use
record
Something: byte;
case byte of
1: (x,y:
