Re[4]: [fpc-pascal] variant part of a record

2006-09-20 Thread Пётр Косаревский
It's on my todo list to implement such checks (when enabled by a command line switch, of course). It's not that easy as it may look at first sight though. Jonas It's great news! However, in the case of such checks, ability to explicitly place tag variable in the record structure or to

Re: Re[4]: [fpc-pascal] variant part of a record

2006-09-20 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 20 sep 2006, at 14:19, Пётр Косаревский wrote: It's on my todo list to implement such checks (when enabled by a command line switch, of course). It's not that easy as it may look at first sight though. Jonas It's great news! However, in the case of such checks, ability to explicitly

Re[4]: [fpc-pascal] variant part of a record

2006-09-20 Thread Пётр Косаревский
About contributing: is it useful to comment some parts of documentation (html with comments) with improvements, corrections or compilable examples? For example, would it be meaningful to add an example on the discussed matter with a comment stating, that there are no such checks tonow?

Re: Re[4]: [fpc-pascal] variant part of a record

2006-09-20 Thread Marco van de Voort
On 20 sep 2006, at 14:19, ??? wrote: Hacking the parser to support this directly is a waste of time imho (not to mention that it would break the code's compatibility with every other Pascal compiler out there afaik). Actually,?I wished for this one time or another. Usually