Re: Re[9]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-26 Thread Peter Vreman
These are pretty big when taken together. ... ... An optional downloadable package would probably make more sense though. Yes. Hint, link and package/link to smallest possible set of libraries would be better. I am not experienced with many things, so this was pretty confusing (can't find

Re[9]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-25 Thread Пётр Косаревский
These are pretty big when taken together. ... ... An optional downloadable package would probably make more sense though. Yes. Hint, link and package/link to smallest possible set of libraries would be better. I am not experienced with many things, so this was pretty confusing (can't find

Re[9]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-25 Thread Пётр Косаревский
for libgdb.a needed for our IDE as well). OTOH, if we ship gprof.exe, we should probably ship the needed libraries and vice versa, it doesn't make too much sense as it is now... By the way: I don't use IDE (it is not handy due to many issues that are not bugs), but when I tried, it completely

Re: Re[9]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-25 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 25 apr 2006, at 17:18, Пётр Косаревский wrote: These are pretty big when taken together. ... ... An optional downloadable package would probably make more sense though. Yes. Hint, link and package/link to smallest possible set of libraries would be better. I am not experienced with