Re: [fpc-pascal] Any suggestion for raspberry pi ?

2013-08-31 Thread Fischer Stefan
Hi,

I've compiled a program on a raspberry pi with Linux rpi2 3.6.11+ #538 PREEMPT 
Fri Aug 30 20:42:08 BST 2013 armv6l GNU/Linux
on one raspberry pi, run it and it works.

I copied the binary program to another raspberry pi with the same kernel 
revision  and I've got a segmentation fault.

What to do if I I want to compile the sources only on one machine, without 
copying the sources to any other machine ?

Thanks,
Stefan  



Am 30.08.2013 um 16:10 schrieb Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com:

 On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 03:44:35PM +0200, Stefan Fischer wrote:
 Hi,
 a longer time ago, i've installed lazarus on my raspberry pi with
 wheezy. The fpc version was 2.6.0-xxx
 
 I could compile without any problem.
 
 Today I've downloaded fpc 2.6.2 and installed it.
 
 But now I have problems with the linker:
 
 Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.2 [2013/02/15] for arm
 Copyright (c) 1993-2012 by Florian Klaempfl and others
 Target OS: Linux for ARMEL
 Compiling rfm.pas
 Assembling rfm
 Linking rfm
 /usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you forget
 -T?
 /usr/lib/fpc/2.6.2/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o: In function
 `_haltproc_eabi':
 (.text+0x88): undefined reference to `_fini'
 /usr/lib/fpc/2.6.2/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o: In function
 `_haltproc_eabi':
 (.text+0x90): undefined reference to `_init'
 
 This sounds like it may be a multiarch thing biting you.  Those symbols
 are in crti.o, and perhaps fpc isn't finding it.  I vaguely remember
 getting a problem like this and fixing it by adding
 -Fl/usr/lib/arch-triplet.  You can use `locate` to check where it is.
 
 Henry
 ___
 fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
 http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Mit freundlichen Gruessen,

Stefan Fischer
BASIS GmbH

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Any suggestion for raspberry pi ?

2013-08-30 Thread Henry Vermaak
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 03:44:35PM +0200, Stefan Fischer wrote:
 Hi,
 a longer time ago, i've installed lazarus on my raspberry pi with
 wheezy. The fpc version was 2.6.0-xxx
 
 I could compile without any problem.
 
 Today I've downloaded fpc 2.6.2 and installed it.
 
 But now I have problems with the linker:
 
 Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.2 [2013/02/15] for arm
 Copyright (c) 1993-2012 by Florian Klaempfl and others
 Target OS: Linux for ARMEL
 Compiling rfm.pas
 Assembling rfm
 Linking rfm
 /usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you forget
 -T?
 /usr/lib/fpc/2.6.2/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o: In function
 `_haltproc_eabi':
 (.text+0x88): undefined reference to `_fini'
 /usr/lib/fpc/2.6.2/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o: In function
 `_haltproc_eabi':
 (.text+0x90): undefined reference to `_init'

This sounds like it may be a multiarch thing biting you.  Those symbols
are in crti.o, and perhaps fpc isn't finding it.  I vaguely remember
getting a problem like this and fixing it by adding
-Fl/usr/lib/arch-triplet.  You can use `locate` to check where it is.

Henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] a suggestion...

2006-05-25 Thread Florian Klaempfl
ϸòð Êîñàðåâñêèé ñ mail.ru wrote:
 FK Jonas Maebe wrote:
 On 24 mei 2006, at 17:30, Florian Klaempfl wrote:

 Not really because it is simply a tar ball of several .tar.gz. Because
 gzip is spread wider, we use this instead of bzip2/7zip.
 Isn't bzip2 available more or less everywhere nowadays? (at least where
 gzip is available, and in particular on Linux?)
 FK At least on debian woody it wasn't installed by default. No idea about
 FK sarge.
 
 
 Just wondering: is RAR considered spread wide?

No.

 
 I know that compressor is commercial, 

Thus everybody building releases needs to buy a rar license?

 but uncompressor is not (sources
 are available, if I remember right), and it
 compresses sources better than gzip by 25% (often even more). There
 are better compressors, they are free (sometimes even open source),
 but support matters (dos, windows, pocket pc, linux, free bsd and
 macos x versions are ready to download).
 
 Or is it completely unacceptable because it isn't free?

So the fpc installer needs to deliver a unrar binary? Forget about this
on Linux, this requires more maintainance work than fpc itself ;)
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] a suggestion...

2006-05-24 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Krishna wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 Is there any particular reason for not compressing the release
 tarballs (Linux f.e) with say bzip2 or even 7zip?  The uncompressed
 tarball weighs in around 24M and I'm sure bzipping will reduce it by a
 large margin.

Not really because it is simply a tar ball of several .tar.gz. Because
gzip is spread wider, we use this instead of bzip2/7zip.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] a suggestion...

2006-05-24 Thread Jonas Maebe


On 24 mei 2006, at 17:30, Florian Klaempfl wrote:


Not really because it is simply a tar ball of several .tar.gz. Because
gzip is spread wider, we use this instead of bzip2/7zip.


Isn't bzip2 available more or less everywhere nowadays? (at least  
where gzip is available, and in particular on Linux?)



Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] a suggestion...

2006-05-24 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Jonas Maebe wrote:
 
 On 24 mei 2006, at 17:30, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
 
 Not really because it is simply a tar ball of several .tar.gz. Because
 gzip is spread wider, we use this instead of bzip2/7zip.
 
 Isn't bzip2 available more or less everywhere nowadays? (at least where
 gzip is available, and in particular on Linux?)
 

At least on debian woody it wasn't installed by default. No idea about
sarge.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal]A suggestion.

2003-07-25 Thread Jonas Maebe
On vrijdag, jul 25, 2003, at 08:30 Europe/Brussels, A.J. Venter wrote:

I miss being able to put the cursor on a function/procedure/reserved
word name and hitting F1 to see the help section for it.
The text mode IDE already has support for this (using the html 
documentation).

Jonas

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal]A suggestion.

2003-07-25 Thread James Mills
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
 
 On vrijdag, jul 25, 2003, at 08:30 Europe/Brussels, A.J. Venter wrote:
 
 I miss being able to put the cursor on a function/procedure/reserved
 word name and hitting F1 to see the help section for it.
 
 The text mode IDE already has support for this (using the html 
 documentation).

I use to use borland's turbo pascal ide once too, but I don't miss this
feature :) Nowadays vim suits be better

cheers
James

 
 
 Jonas
 
 
 ___
 fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

-- 
-
- James Mills
Zero Defect Software Engineers Group - ZDSEG

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal]A suggestion.

2003-07-25 Thread A.J. Venter
Trouble is, that is the only feature I miss !
Everything else about the borland IDE is downright annoying in it's
primitiveness. Had this not been the case, I would have been using the
fp ide anyway.
I use vim myself.  
Hence my thought of a separate proggie that can do this. The easy way
here would be to extract the section of the fp ide that does this, and
create a modified standalone version that simply dumps the results to
standard out. No sense reinventing the wheel, except for one tiny
downside - we have no access to the ide sources. 
Perhaps someone who does could mail me just the part in question, I will
do the rest. 
I cannot imagine I am the only one who would like this. 

Mind you, it would even make a nifty plugin for lazarus.

A.J.

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 14:11, James Mills wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
  
  On vrijdag, jul 25, 2003, at 08:30 Europe/Brussels, A.J. Venter wrote:
  
  I miss being able to put the cursor on a function/procedure/reserved
  word name and hitting F1 to see the help section for it.
  
  The text mode IDE already has support for this (using the html 
  documentation).
 
 I use to use borland's turbo pascal ide once too, but I don't miss this
 feature :) Nowadays vim suits be better
 
 cheers
 James
 
  
  
  Jonas
  
  
  ___
  fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
-- 
Do not try to think outside the box. That's impossible. 
Instead only try to realise the truthThere is no box.

A.J. Venter
Tech Guru
DireqLearn.



___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal]A suggestion.

2003-07-25 Thread Jonas Maebe
On vrijdag, jul 25, 2003, at 14:17 Europe/Brussels, A.J. Venter wrote:

No sense reinventing the wheel, except for one tiny
downside - we have no access to the ide sources.
Sure you do, checkout the module ide from cvs. The problem with the 
IDE is that you can't build the version we distribute, because of the 
problems with the Free Vision license.

Jonas

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal