I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
and call it 3, this is accomplished by a cross-reference to the third
footnote.
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away with if
you're not following a
: Footnote Out of Sequence
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim jim.pink...@voith.com wrote:
I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
and
Hi, Jim:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Pinkham, Jim jim.pink...@voith.com wrote:
Hi, Peter --
Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three are
fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference
technique. The only thing I had expected, based on the
No problem, Peter. Thanks for thinking it over :)
-Original Message-
From: knowhow...@gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Pinkham, Jim
Cc: Art Campbell; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out
: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Footnote Out of Sequence
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:15:39 -0600
Hi, Peter --
Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three are
fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference
technique. The only thing I had expected, based
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:55:18 +, Christopher Seal cs...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
I had an instance where I had to replicate a published report, and that
report had Tables with footnotes as part of the regular footnote sequence.
In FM this was not possible so I faked it as follows. I created a
I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
and call it 3, this is accomplished by a cross-reference to the third
footnote.
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away with if
you're not following a
: Footnote Out of Sequence
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
>> I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
>> The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
>> as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
>> and call it 3,
: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 12:15 PM
To: Art Campbell
Cc: Pinkham, Jim; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out of Sequence
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim
wrote:
>> I have a
Hi, Jim:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
> Hi, Peter --
>
> Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three are
> fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference
> technique. The only thing I had expected, based on the marked-up manual
>
No problem, Peter. Thanks for thinking it over :)
-Original Message-
From: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Pinkham, Jim
Cc: Art Campbell; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out
uggested, I'd be interested to learn
>about it and consider going that route.
>
>Regards,
>Jim
>
>-Original Message-
>From: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhowpro at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Peter Gold
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 12:15 PM
>To: Art Cam
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:55:18 +, "Christopher Seal"
wrote:
>I had an instance where I had to replicate a published report, and that
>report had Tables with footnotes as part of the regular footnote sequence.
>In FM this was not possible so I faked it as follows. I created a real
>footnote
17 matches
Mail list logo
