This has saved me much hell in auto-numbering and bullets in Word -
http://www.tech-tav.com/macro.htm. They are free macros from tech-tav
(authorIT producers) that automate autonumbering, bullets, etc. in Word.
They work like a charm and they are based on Framemaker principles. All my
ramers at lists.frameusers.com
Cc: Fred Ridder; srogers at phoenix-geophysics.com
Subject: Re: OT: autonumbering in Word
On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:21:46 -0400, "Fred Ridder"
wrote:
>>From: Stuart Rogers
>
>>Regrettably, Jon, it sounds from McGhie's explanation that ev
Hi Lin,
The great realization I had about Word is that the autonumbering feature
is NOT an attribute of the paragraph style like it is in FrameMaker.
Instead, think of the paragraph styles as being attributes of the
autonumbering feature. In turn, think of the autonumbering as an
attribute of the
Jon Harvey wrote:
Hi Lin,
The great realization I had about Word is that the autonumbering feature
is NOT an attribute of the paragraph style like it is in FrameMaker.
Instead, think of the paragraph styles as being attributes of the
autonumbering feature. In turn, think of the autonumbering as
From: Stuart Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regrettably, Jon, it sounds from McGhie's explanation that even your
exhaustively careful preparation of numbering will not immunize you from
all risks of numbering disaster. Apparently all you have to do is copy some
numbered (or just bulleted!) content
]
On Behalf Of Fred Ridder
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: OT: autonumbering in Word
From: Stuart Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regrettably, Jon, it sounds from McGhie's explanation that even your
exhaustively careful preparation
From: Jeremy H. Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
The drawback WRT maintenance in Word is that you have to
copy the SEQ fields from another para of the same type, or
painfully recreate them by hand, for new paras; you can't
include SEQ fields (or bullets) in the para format as such.
Back in
Hi Lin,
The great realization I had about Word is that the autonumbering feature
is NOT an attribute of the paragraph style like it is in FrameMaker.
Instead, think of the paragraph styles as being attributes of the
autonumbering feature. In turn, think of the autonumbering as an
attribute of the
Jon Harvey wrote:
> Hi Lin,
>
> The great realization I had about Word is that the autonumbering feature
> is NOT an attribute of the paragraph style like it is in FrameMaker.
> Instead, think of the paragraph styles as being attributes of the
> autonumbering feature. In turn, think of the
>From: Stuart Rogers
>Regrettably, Jon, it sounds from McGhie's explanation that even your
>exhaustively careful preparation of numbering will not immunize you from
>all risks of numbering disaster. Apparently all you have to do is copy some
>numbered (or just bulleted!) content from another
> In my experience with Word, the only truly reliable way to
> handle numbering in Word is to avoid the autonumber feature
> altogether and instead roll your own with the SEQ field code,
Right, but the fact is, it's obviously *supposed* to work somehow, isn't
it?
You're not supposed to have
@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+jharvey=cambridgesoft.com at lists.frameusers.com]
On Behalf Of Fred Ridder
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:22 PM
To: srogers at phoenix-geophysics.com
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: OT: autonumbering in Word
>From: Stuart Rog
"Anne Robotti"
>To:
>Subject: RE: OT: autonumbering in Word
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:24:59 -0400
>
> > In my experience with Word, the only truly reliable way to
> > handle numbering in Word is to avoid the autonumber feature
> > altogether and in
I agree. What I've been able to do is create autonumbered documents that
seem to hold better than a house of cards. I still can't build a
fortress tho. There's always gonna be someone who can mess it up. It's
not necessarily because they are careless either. Microsoft has tried so
hard to
On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:21:46 -0400, "Fred Ridder"
wrote:
>>From: Stuart Rogers
>
>>Regrettably, Jon, it sounds from McGhie's explanation that even your
>>exhaustively careful preparation of numbering will not immunize you from
>>all risks of numbering disaster. Apparently all you have to do
>From: "Jeremy H. Griffith"
>The drawback WRT maintenance in Word is that you have to
>copy the SEQ fields from another para of the same type, or
>painfully recreate them by hand, for new paras; you can't
>include SEQ fields (or bullets) in the para format as such.
Back in the days when our
16 matches
Mail list logo
