Grant Hogarth would like to recall the message, OT: Syntax for if/then
statement.
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:43 PM the ever-sharp Bill Briggs noted
web At 12:33 PM -0600 6/29/06, Grant Hogarth, self-professed pedant,
wrote:
GHTo build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
GHThere also exists the possibility of a conditional dependency of
action.
GH E.g. If your
On Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:43 PM the ever-sharp Bill Briggs noted
At 12:33 PM -0600 6/29/06, Grant Hogarth, self-professed pedant, wrote:
GH>>To build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
GH>>There also exists the possibility of a conditional dependency of
action.
GH>> E.g. "If
Grant Hogarth would like to recall the message, "OT: Syntax for if/then
statement".
On Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:43 PM the ever-sharp Bill Briggs noted
web> At 12:33 PM -0600 6/29/06, Grant Hogarth, self-professed pedant,
wrote:
GH>>To build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
GH>>There also exists the possibility of a conditional dependency of
action.
GH>> E.g.
Grant Hogarth wrote:
> On Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:43 PM the ever-sharp Bill Briggs noted
> web> At 12:33 PM -0600 6/29/06, Grant Hogarth, self-professed pedant,
> wrote:
> GH>>To build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
...
> Realizing just how long it has been since he has had to
that's where the if/then statement syntax was
developed, but. . . .
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter
http://techcommdood.blogspot.com
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED
Our new editor wants to add the word and to
such statements - if blah, blah, AND then blah, blah.
But that doesn't even make sense grammatically!
The closest thing I can find is in the Microsoft Manual of Style for
Technical Publications, it's the if/when/whether thing. I know that
doesn't
At 11:22 -0600 29/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our new editor wants to add the word and to such statements - if blah,
blah, AND then blah, blah. Both I and the other writer disagree with the
editor on this one - it should be just if/then - no and.
Boy are you going to have fun with your new
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:22 AM
To: framers@frameusers.com
Subject: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
All,
I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
for this request. Another writer here at Jeppesen and I
Donald, Christine, Jeremy, et. al.
LOL! This list makes my day. Believe you me, I would like to be blunt as
some of you were in your emails (the responses were hysterical!), but I
can summarize the responses (in a politically correct format, mind you!)
and go from there.
Thanks for all of
At 10:22 AM 6/29/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our new editor wants to add the word and to such
statements - if blah, blah, AND then blah, blah. Both I and the other
writer disagree with the editor on this one - it should be just if/then -
no and.
Tammy,
I think your editor is overreacting
readers could
probably not care less.
FWIW,
Chuck Beck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 1:22 PM
To: framers@frameusers.com
Subject: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
All,
I am hoping the fellow
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:22:20 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Our new editor wants to add the word and to such statements - if
blah, blah, AND then blah, blah. Both I and the other writer
disagree with the editor on this one
Steve Rickaby wrote on 06/29/2006 01:47:56 PM:
If/then and If/then/else or If/then/eiseif/else have been the
constructs in any programming language that I can remember working
in.
While I won't argue with the underlying point Steve's logic with respect
to the addition of an AND clause to
For example: If the new editor prevails, and then the boss buys into
it, then you have no choice but to type up your resume.
Brilliant example! But let's end on a happy note...
Else hire a new editor. ;-)
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Beck, Charles
Hi Tammy,
Bad news: At least one major style guide and my own experience are on
your new editor's side on this one. In fact, the _Microsoft Manual of
Style for Technical Publications,
Bad news: At least one major style guide and my own experience are on
your new editor's side on this one. In fact, the _Microsoft Manual of
Style for Technical Publications, Third Edition_ takes it even further:
That style guide states that you should avoid the if...then
construction altogether
, then do this, or If such-and-such is true, do
this.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Bill Swallow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 2:09 PM
To: Beck, Charles
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Syntax for if/then statement
Bad news: At least one
However, in the case of a conditional construct, I stand by my statement
and conviction that most readers could not care less whether we say, If
such-and-such is true, then do this, or If such-and-such is true, do
this.
Right, then is assumed, just as you is assumed in your examples. :-)
I'll
To: framers@frameusers.com
Subject: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
All,
I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
for this request. Another writer here at Jeppesen and I have always used
the following syntax for a conditional/causal statement: If blah,
blah
At 12:33 PM -0600 6/29/06, Grant Hogarth, self-professed pedant, wrote:
To build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
There also exists the possibility of a conditional dependency of action.
E.g. If your book wins a Pulitzer, [then] you
[will/can/must/shall/may/ought
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:22 AM
To: framers@frameusers.com
Subject: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
All,
I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
for this request. Another writer here
All,
I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
for this request. Another writer here at Jeppesen and I have always used
the following syntax for a conditional/causal statement: If <blah, blah>,
then <blah, blah>. We have a new editor that jus
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:22:20 -0600, Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com
wrote:
>Our new editor wants to add the word "and" to such statements -
>if , AND then . Both I and the other
>writer disagree with the editor on this one - it should be just
>if/then - no "and."
nd
> it now. Googling only leads me to programming references - the thin thread
> here would be since we are writing software documentation, if/then, would
> make sense, since that's where the if/then statement syntax was
> developed, but. . . .
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter
http://techcommdood.blogspot.com
> Our new editor wants to add the word "and" to
> such statements - if , AND then .
But that doesn't even make sense grammatically!
The closest thing I can find is in the Microsoft Manual of Style for
Technical Publications, it's the if/when/whether thing. I know that
At 11:22 -0600 29/6/06, Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com wrote:
>Our new editor wants to add the word "and" to such statements - if blah>, AND then . Both I and the other writer disagree with the
>editor on this one - it should be just if/then - no "and."
Boy are you going
"
Jim
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces+jlight=pillardata@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+jlight=pillardata.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:22 AM
To: framers at frameusers.com
Subje
Donald, Christine, Jeremy, et. al.
LOL! This list makes my day. Believe you me, I would like to be blunt as
some of you were in your emails (the responses were hysterical!), but I
can summarize the responses (in a politically correct format, mind you!)
and go from there.
Thanks for all of
At 10:22 AM 6/29/2006, Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com wrote:
>Our new editor wants to add the word "and" to such
>statements - if , AND then . Both I and the other
>writer disagree with the editor on this one - it should be just if/then -
>no "and."
Tammy,
I think your
at jeppesen.com
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 1:22 PM
To: framers at frameusers.com
Subject: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
All,
I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
for this request. Another writer here at Jeppesen and I have always used
the following s
But if you're asked for supporting facts, you'll print out all these
e-mails and hand them to your "editor", right? ;-)
On 6/29/06, Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com
wrote:
> LOL! This list makes my day. Believe you me, I would like to be blunt as
> some of you were in your emails (the
Cheers,
Chuck Beck
-Original Message-----
Subject: Re: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:22:20 -0600, Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com
wrote:
>Our new editor wants to add the word "and" to such statements - if
><blah, blah>, AND then <blah,
Steve Rickaby wrote on 06/29/2006 01:47:56 PM:
> If/then and If/then/else or If/then/eiseif/else have been the
> constructs in any programming language that I can remember working
> in.
While I won't argue with the underlying point Steve's logic with respect
to the addition of an AND clause to
> For example: "If the new editor prevails, and then the boss buys into
> it, then you have no choice but to type up your resume."
Brilliant example! But let's end on a happy note...
Else hire a new editor. ;-)
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces+rshelton=opentext.com at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces+rshelton=opentext.com at lists.frameusers.com]On
> Behalf Of Beck, Charles
>
> Hi Tammy,
>
> Bad news: At least one major style guide and my own experience are on
> your
> Bad news: At least one major style guide and my own experience are on
> your new editor's side on this one. In fact, the _Microsoft Manual of
> Style for Technical Publications, Third Edition_ takes it even further:
> That style guide states that you should avoid the "if...then"
> construction
/LwtaDependant_Clauses_and_Phrases.htm
Z
Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com wrote:
> All,
>
> I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
> for this request. Another writer here at Jeppesen and I have always used
> the following syntax for a conditional/c
true, then do this," or "If such-and-such is true, do
this."
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Bill Swallow [mailto:techcommd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 2:09 PM
To: Beck, Charles
Cc: Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com; framers at frameusers.com
> However, in the case of a conditional construct, I stand by my statement
> and conviction that most readers could not care less whether we say, "If
> such-and-such is true, then do this," or "If such-and-such is true, do
> this."
Right, "then" is assumed, just as "you" is assumed in your
I think there's two things going on here. But, the editor should be open to
discussion because she's a member of the team.
Anyway:
1) If X then Y is fine. The conditional clause can be introduced that way.
However, where I think the editor is going is the need for coordinating
conjunctions to
n=esph.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:22 AM
To: framers at frameusers.com
Subject: OT: Syntax for if/then statement
All,
I am hoping the fellow writers on this list can provide some information
for this request. Another w
Beck, Charles wrote:
> However, in the case of a conditional construct, I stand by my statement
> and conviction that most readers could not care less whether we say, "If
> such-and-such is true, then do this," or "If such-and-such is true, do
> this."
As always, consider your audience. Perhaps
At 2:04 PM -0400 6/29/06, eric.dunn at ca.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
>Firstly, logically speaking, isn't there a difference between:
>- If A, and then B
>and
>- If A and B
From the point of view of someone who is used to such structures in
programming languages the first variant would
To build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
There also exists the possibility of a conditional dependency of action.
E.g. "If your book wins a Pulitzer, [then] you
[will/can/must/shall/may/ought to/...] celebrate..."
- If A, then B (explicit consequence,
At 2:13 PM -0400 6/29/06, Beck, Charles wrote:
>However, in the case of a conditional construct, I stand by my statement
>and conviction that most readers could not care less whether we say, "If
>such-and-such is true, then do this," or "If such-and-such is true, do
>this."
I agree. In the
At 2:22 PM -0400 6/29/06, T.W. Smith wrote:
>2) Click File, click New. That comma splice becomes, "Click File, then click
>New." which is technically incorrect and ought be "Click File, and then click
>New."
But this isn't even the same construct. This is an imperative; a set of
instructions:
At 12:33 PM -0600 6/29/06, Grant Hogarth, self-professed pedant, wrote:
>To build still further on Eric's excellent discourse:
>
>There also exists the possibility of a conditional dependency of action.
> E.g. "If your book wins a Pulitzer, [then] you
>
Bill Briggs wrote on 06/29/2006 03:30:32 PM:
> At 2:04 PM -0400 6/29/06, eric.dunn at ca.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
> >Firstly, logically speaking, isn't there a difference between:
> >- If A, and then B
> >and
> >- If A and B
> From the point of view of someone who is used to such
ecessarily reflect those of TuVox, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces+jmalin=tuvox@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+jmalin=tuvox.com at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf
Of Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:22 AM
To: framers at frame
51 matches
Mail list logo