Farewell to fortune -o :(

2013-06-03 Thread Jakub Lach
I will miss them, for me they were right there with- http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionamp;revision=238968 * http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=248200 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Farewell-to-fortune-o-tp5817389.html Sent

Re: /newbie_forums

2012-12-08 Thread Jakub Lach
I'm sure precise and clear described problems/questions [1] are not out of place on -questions, moreover you can always use http://forums.freebsd.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4 [1] http://www.gerv.net/hacking/how-to-ask-good-questions/ -- View this message in context:

Re: Google spyware on FreeBSD Web site?

2012-12-04 Thread Jakub Lach
IF you trust Opera and IF you trust said extension, there is always Ghostery with very wide selection of blocking tracking scripts, google related included. This is probably most user friendly solution of unfortunate state of modern web. FYI, freshports.org supplementary uses google search

Re: Unified BSD?

2012-11-13 Thread Jakub Lach
mksh is certainly not, and I use it daily on FreeBSD and really like it. The same I could say about openntpd from OpenBSD. Isn't it like it should be then? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Unified-BSD-tp5760356p5760566.html Sent from the freebsd-chat

RE: Unified BSD?

2012-11-12 Thread Jakub Lach
+1 Also, all projects being _open_ it's not like there isn't any useful cross-talk in sources, there is. And all projects can focus on their precise goals. Win-win. Of course, if some sub-goals are common, collaboration is encouraged (e.g. editor suite, chromium, I believe some wifi

Re: FreeBSD MATE (GNOME2) Project News

2012-06-08 Thread Jakub Lach
If you are saying that you are using Mate on FreeBSD, don't hesitate and make a port :) About Trinity, they biggest problem is that they want to port kde3 to qt4, unnecessary imho. They should focus on legacy desktops + maintain qt33. And they only have 5 contributors. And attracting rather

Re: FreeBSD MATE (GNOME2) Project News

2012-06-08 Thread Jakub Lach
Right now, we still don't have Gnome3 in ports, right? So all hypothetical efforts probably will go that way... or not at all. -gnome looks a bit stale. I know that there was some porting of gtk3. You should contact -gnome or bug author of GhostBSD, maybe he would like to start working on

Re: FreeBSD MATE (GNOME2) Project News

2012-06-08 Thread Jakub Lach
FWIW, current Gnome3 work is done here http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/gnome3/ -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-MATE-GNOME2-Project-News-tp5622414p5716617.html Sent from the freebsd-chat mailing list archive at Nabble.com.