Re: svn commit: r360233 - in head: contrib/jemalloc . . . : This partially breaks a 2-socket 32-bit powerpc (old PowerMac G4) based on head -r360311

2020-05-03 Thread Mark Millard
[The bit argument ot bitmap_unset seems to be way too large.] On 2020-May-3, at 11:08, Mark Millard wrote: > [At around 4AM local time dhcient got a signal 11, > despite the jemalloc revert. The other exmaples > have not happened.] > > On 2020-May-2, at 18:46, Mark Millard wrote: > >> [I'm

Re: svn commit: r360233 - in head: contrib/jemalloc . . . : This partially breaks a 2-socket 32-bit powerpc (old PowerMac G4) based on head -r360311

2020-05-03 Thread Mark Millard
[At around 4AM local time dhcient got a signal 11, despite the jemalloc revert. The other exmaples have not happened.] On 2020-May-2, at 18:46, Mark Millard wrote: > [I'm only claiming the new jemalloc is involved and that > reverting avoids the problem.] > > I've been reporting to some lists

Re: sysutils/screen-ncurses port

2020-05-03 Thread Cy Schubert
In message <20200430130449.cwsf3x42o6w67...@ivaldir.net>, Baptiste Daroussin wr ites: > > > --mvhxgm4zl62unzlf > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:56:54AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:

Re: svn commit: r360233 - in head: contrib/jemalloc . . . : This partially breaks a 2-socket 32-bit powerpc (old PowerMac G4) based on head -r360311

2020-05-03 Thread Mark Millard
On 2020-May-3, at 01:26, nonameless at ukr.net wrote: > --- Original message --- > From: "Mark Millard" > Date: 3 May 2020, 04:47:14 > > > >> [I'm only claiming the new jemalloc is involved and that >> reverting avoids the problem.] >> >> I've been reporting to some lists problems with:

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

2020-05-03 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > That LOR site hasn't been updated in years. Many many years. If someone wants to help me set up a page on the wiki, let me know. (I have too much on my plate to do it myself.) mcl ___

Re: beadm no longer able to destroy, maybe since using OpenZFS

2020-05-03 Thread Graham Perrin
On 03/05/2020 06:05, Graham Perrin wrote: After reverting from OpenZFS to ZFS, I was able to destroy two of the boot environments that previously (below, 1st May, OpenZFS) could not be destroyed. I'm left with at least one BE 'r360237c' that can not be destroyed. Is it ever normal to find a

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

2020-05-03 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 20:36 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I am compiling some packages with poudriere on 13-current kernel. I > > > > noticed some strange messages printed into the terminal and dmesg: > > > > > > > > lock order reversal: > > > > > > [...] > > > > Are those the debug

Re[2]: svn commit: r360233 - in head: contrib/jemalloc . . . : This partially breaks a 2-socket 32-bit powerpc (old PowerMac G4) based on head -r360311

2020-05-03 Thread nonameless
--- Original message --- From: "Mark Millard"  Date: 3 May 2020, 17:38:14 > > > On 2020-May-3, at 01:26, nonameless at > ukr.net wrote: > > > > > > --- Original message --- > > From: "Mark Millard" > > Date: 3 May 2020, 04:47:14 > > > > > > > >> [I'm only claiming the new

Re: panic: Assertion lock == sq->sq_lock failed at /usr/src-13/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:371

2020-05-03 Thread Grzegorz Junka
On 03/05/2020 15:13, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Sun, 3 May 2020 14:11:09 +0100 Grzegorz Junka wrote: I don't have a partition that I could use for swap. I have two whole disks added to ZFS. Maybe on the boot drive but that would require repartitioning and I have Windows/FreeBSD there, so not

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

2020-05-03 Thread Grzegorz Junka
On 03/05/2020 15:00, Niclas Zeising wrote: On 2020-05-02 20:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote: I don't know, either 8-} bz@ is in Cc:, so he'll probably know what to do. How do I know if I have got a backtrace? Are those errors: pid 43297 (conftest), jid 5, uid 0: exited on signal 11 related or it's

Re: panic: Assertion lock == sq->sq_lock failed at /usr/src-13/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:371

2020-05-03 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sun, 3 May 2020 14:11:09 +0100 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 03/05/2020 08:05, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Sat, 02 May 2020 16:28:46 -0700 > > Chris wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > Another thing is that I don't quite understand why the crash couldn't > > be dumped. > > > >

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

2020-05-03 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2020-05-02 20:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I am compiling some packages with poudriere on 13-current kernel. I noticed some strange messages printed into the terminal and dmesg: lock order reversal: [...] Are those the debug messages that aren't visible on non-current kernel and should

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

2020-05-03 Thread Grzegorz Junka
On 02/05/2020 10:08, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I am compiling some packages with poudriere on 13-current kernel. I noticed some strange messages printed into the terminal and dmesg: lock order reversal:  1st 0xf8010ca78250 zfs (zfs) @ /usr/src-13/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1005  2nd

Re: panic: Assertion lock == sq->sq_lock failed at /usr/src-13/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:371

2020-05-03 Thread Grzegorz Junka
On 03/05/2020 08:05, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Sat, 02 May 2020 16:28:46 -0700 Chris wrote: Another thing is that I don't quite understand why the crash couldn't be dumped. root@crayon2:~ # swapinfo Device__ 1K-blocks Used__ Avail Capacity

Re: Trying to compiles today Current

2020-05-03 Thread Marco Steinbach
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 15:36:22 +0200 Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > I keep getting errors in building my ports from portsbuilder. > But it is with Current/Clang10. > > So I'm trying to get a server at that level, but building world > keeps giving me: > --- all_subdir_cddl --- > ld: > error:

Re[2]: svn commit: r360233 - in head: contrib/jemalloc . . . : This partially breaks a 2-socket 32-bit powerpc (old PowerMac G4) based on head -r360311

2020-05-03 Thread nonameless
--- Original message --- From: "Mark Millard"  Date: 3 May 2020, 04:47:14 > [I'm only claiming the new jemalloc is involved and that > reverting avoids the problem.] > > I've been reporting to some lists problems with: > > dhclient > sendmail > rpcbind > mountd > nfsd > > getting

Re: panic: Assertion lock == sq->sq_lock failed at /usr/src-13/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:371

2020-05-03 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 02 May 2020 16:28:46 -0700 Chris wrote: > On Sun, 3 May 2020 00:15:48 +0100 Grzegorz Junka li...@gjunka.com said > > > On 02/05/2020 20:43, Chris wrote: > > > On Sat, 2 May 2020 20:19:56 +0100 Grzegorz Junka li...@gjunka.com said > > > > > >> On 02/05/2020 14:56, Grzegorz Junka