Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-23 Thread Charlie Li
Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > I don't fully recall, but I think that the hg conversion was slow and > the disk space needed was quite a bit more than git. > One of Mercurial's biggest design principles is immutable history (with history rewriting disabled by default), so increased disk space compared

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-23 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 23/12/2020 13:54, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:02:08 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from cvs to hg (Mercurial). Do anybody have a link to some documents stating

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-23 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:02:08 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from cvs to hg (Mercurial). Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git and why NetBSD chose

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
> Yes. I was answering the first question asked about FreeBSD and git... > The clincher for me was that git is better supported by third party tools > and has gotten quite good at 'recovery from oops' which mercurial is still > lacking in both areas. I too have used both, and I had to re clone my

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-18 Thread Guido Falsi
On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote: On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from cvs to hg (Mercurial). Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git and why NetBSD chose Mercurial? I am using

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 9:24 AM Gleb Popov wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:50 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 7:27 AM Guido Falsi wrote: >> >> > On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> > > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> > > >> > >> NetBSD users face

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-18 Thread Gleb Popov
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:50 PM Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 7:27 AM Guido Falsi wrote: > > > On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > > > >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from > > >> cvs to

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 7:27 AM Guido Falsi wrote: > On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from > >> cvs to hg (Mercurial). > > > > Do anybody have a link to some documents

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-18 Thread Juraj Lutter
> On 18 Dec 2020, at 14:02, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: > >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from cvs to >> hg (Mercurial). > > Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-18 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from cvs to hg (Mercurial). Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git and why NetBSD chose Mercurial? I am using both tools at $WORK, I am just curious

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-12-17 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 10:05:48 -0500, Shawn Webb wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:00:50PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists wrote: > > > As subject - what will there be in base to interact

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:09 AM Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > We hope to have it finished in time for 13.0. > > I also feel that it should be more a "requirement". > > I don't see the rush in getting 13.0 out the door. There is a lot to >

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 9:25 AM Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2020-11-25, Warner Losh wrote: > > >> Shouldn't it be in base before the move to git? > > > > We will have got (from OpenBSD: Game Of Trees) in the future. It isn't > > quite there yet, however, so it's not in base. > > Since got

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 6:16 AM tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists wrote: > > > >> As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git > repo? > >> I mean, right now, for svn

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2020-11-25, Warner Losh wrote: >> Shouldn't it be in base before the move to git? > > We will have got (from OpenBSD: Game Of Trees) in the future. It isn't > quite there yet, however, so it's not in base. Since got can't fetch from http(s) yet, there was talk of setting up anon-ssh access.

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > We hope to have it finished in time for 13.0. I also feel that it should be more a "requirement". I don't see the rush in getting 13.0 out the door. There is a lot to get working (especially in ports-land). mcl

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Shawn Webb
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:00:50PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists wrote: > > > > > As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? > > > I mean, right now,

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists wrote: > > > As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? > > I mean, right now, for svn there is svnlite. What for git? > > > > 'pkg add git' is your choice

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-25 Thread tech-lists
Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists wrote: As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? I mean, right now, for svn there is svnlite. What for git? 'pkg add git' is your choice now.

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-24 Thread Thomas Mueller
from tech-lists: > As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? > I mean, right now, for svn there is svnlite. What for git? > Shouldn't it be in base before the move to git? Good question, and I hope the developers and others in charge are reading your post. You

Re: git tools for building in base?

2020-11-24 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists wrote: > As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? > I mean, right now, for svn there is svnlite. What for git? > 'pkg add git' is your choice now. > Shouldn't it be in base before the move to git? > We will have got

git tools for building in base?

2020-11-24 Thread tech-lists
Hi, As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? I mean, right now, for svn there is svnlite. What for git? Shouldn't it be in base before the move to git? thanks, -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature