Re: mysterious setting of B_DIRECT?

2024-04-25 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:09 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:49:23PM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This week I have been doing active testing as a part of an IETF > > > bakeathon for

Re: mysterious setting of B_DIRECT?

2024-04-25 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:09 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:49:23PM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This week I have been doing active testing as a part of an IETF > > bakeathon for NFSv4. During the week I had a NFSv4 client > > crash. On the surface, it

Re: mysterious setting of B_DIRECT?

2024-04-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:49:23PM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > This week I have been doing active testing as a part of an IETF > bakeathon for NFSv4. During the week I had a NFSv4 client > crash. On the surface, it is straightforward, in that it called > ncl_doio_directwrite() and the

mysterious setting of B_DIRECT?

2024-04-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Hi, This week I have been doing active testing as a part of an IETF bakeathon for NFSv4. During the week I had a NFSv4 client crash. On the surface, it is straightforward, in that it called ncl_doio_directwrite() and the field called b_caller1 was NULL. Now, here's the weird part...