On 19.01.2017 19:20, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> Yes, you get x86_64 packages which include i386 compat libraries. All
> programs should just keep working.
Oh, it is not obvious!
--
// Lev Serebryakov
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:07:42 -0600 Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2017-01-19 10:01, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:27:24 +0100 Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-emulation
>> wrote:
>>> Please test the attached patch. I've also removed all the
On 19.01.2017 19:01, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> Committed in r431882. I bumped PORTREVISION on all ports because people
> with linux=c7 in DEFAULT_VERSIONS will get 64 bit packages now.
what about java/linux-oracle-j{dk|re}18? Looks like they are only
32bit, and will not work with new "linux=c7"
On 2017-01-19 10:01, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:27:24 +0100 Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-emulation
wrote:
Please test the attached patch. I've also removed all the linux-f10*
ports from CONFLICTS. linux-c6 will also get it removed when I do 6.9
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:27:24 +0100 Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-emulation
wrote:
> Please test the attached patch. I've also removed all the linux-f10*
> ports from CONFLICTS. linux-c6 will also get it removed when I do 6.9
> (unless someone else does it).
Committed in
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:00:22 +0100 Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-emulation
wrote:
> Is it possible that we drop linux c7 variation? CentOS 7 doesn't
> officially support i386 and there are still no binaries for i386 after
> over a month since 7.3.1611 release.
>
> For
Is it possible that we drop linux c7 variation? CentOS 7 doesn't officially
support i386 and there are still no binaries for i386 after over a month since
7.3.1611 release.
For the last 3 weeks I've had a patch to update the ports to 7.3.1611, but
obviously it's only for amd64.
There would