Quoting "Mikhail T." (from Fri, 19 Jun 2020
14:59:35 -0400):
On 19.06.20 04:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
You should not use USE_LINUX_RPM. It's meant for infrastructure ports.
Yes, this is the current stance, but it seems like an unnecessary
limitation... :( Software distributed by vendors
On 19.06.20 04:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
You should not use USE_LINUX_RPM. It's meant for infrastructure ports.
Yes, this is the current stance, but it seems like an unnecessary
limitation... :( Software distributed by vendors in RPM-format should be
easier for ports to install.
Please,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:43 -0400 "Mikhail T."
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm preparing a port of a Linux application (Zoom conferencing client).
>
> The vendor (zoom.us) offers RPMs for both x86_64 and i686, which makes
> it tempting to just USE_LINUX_RPM. However, that knob unconditionally
>
Hello!
I'm preparing a port of a Linux application (Zoom conferencing client).
The vendor (zoom.us) offers RPMs for both x86_64 and i686, which makes
it tempting to just USE_LINUX_RPM. However, that knob unconditionally
turns on the USE_LINUX_PREFIX, which bsd.port.mk says /not/ to use "for
