On 3/16/2014 8:04 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote:
I'm trying a somewhat elaborate VNET jails setup and for the most part
it's working. I'm using if_epairs, one side that gets passed into the
jail, and the other side that attaches to an if_bridge. The if_bridge
has a member on a vlan interface. So
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
I am unable to add 2 Intel 10 gig nics to my Freebsd 9.1 at 9000 MTU. I tried
to add them last night and was only able to set only a max of 4000 MTU. I get
an error telling me kernel: ix1: Could not setup receive structures and the
interface will not pass traffic.
I found these changes on the
The following reply was made to PR kern/183659; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Charbon, Julien jchar...@verisign.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/183659: [tcp] TCP stack lock contention with short-lived
connections
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:54:03 +0100
Just a
The following reply was made to PR kern/183659; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Charbon, Julien jchar...@verisign.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/183659: [tcp] ]TCP stack lock contention with short-lived
connections
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:39:19 +0100
Just a
There's only one reason RX structures fail, and that's insufficient mbuf
pool.
You will find the driver probably uses the 9K mbuf pool in that driver, so
look
at how many queues it wants to set up, how big your ring is, and do the
math.
Jack
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Wayne Hotmail
Synopsis: [ixgbe] 10gigabit networking problems
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net-jfv
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 17 22:41:15 UTC 2014
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Hi, Jack,
Some FreeNAS users [1] have encountered similar issue too, can you take
a look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
is there any advantage of using vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation?
I mean
ifconfig em0
vlan777: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
ether 00:1b:b9:8b:ca:33
...
vlan: 777 parent interface: em0
vs
