https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable10?,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #29 from Guido Falsi ---
Hi,
Since I submitted this bug I'm asking what is the policy for accounting it as
fixed?
The bug I reported has been fixed in r308643, so my opinion is this bug report
could be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #28 from Warren Block ---
Both the em0 and igb0 interfaces are built into this motherboard, not add-on
cards. There is no separate menu for either interface, at least not obviously.
It might be possible to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #27 from Kaho Toshikazu ---
(In reply to Warren Block from comment #25)
Thank you for your reports.
Are you testing with staying the interface down? Can you try to up
the interface at first? The
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #26 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Warren Block from comment #25)
I seem to recall that the Intel ROM itself has a knob in it for WOL.
Can you access this menu during the bootup and see if its a thing?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #25 from Warren Block ---
Running 'ifconfig igb0 wol_magic' produced no errors, but the machine does not
wake up when a WOL packet is sent to that interface.
For what it's worth, the em0 interface shows
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #24 from Warren Block ---
Patch applied, but WOL_MAGIC not appearing for igb0:
% ifconfig
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 6122
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #23 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #22)
Thank you for working on this. Let's see if we can get some folks testing
various igb(4) devices for success.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
Kaho Toshikazu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #177062|0 |1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #21 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #20)
I think it is ok to *delete* the code being moved instead of #if 0 after
testing confirms this as working.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #20 from Kaho Toshikazu ---
Created attachment 177062
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=177062=edit
a very initial patch to enable WOL for igb
> The igb0 interface does
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #19 from Jeff Pieper ---
Generally for LOMs, the BIOS/FW will only allow WOL to be active on one
interface. That behavior is expected imo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #18 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Warren Block from comment #17)
Probably similar, but I'm unsure based on the fix in this ticket.
I'd suggest spamming a new ticket with pciconv -lv output against igb(4)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #17 from Warren Block ---
The em0 interface on the Supermicro X10SLL-F board mentioned in comment #7
shows a WOL capability and does wake the machine now. The igb0 interface does
not. Could a similar fix
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #16 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: sbruno
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:19:04 UTC 2016
New revision: 308643
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/308643
Log:
Update WOL support for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #14 from Guido Falsi ---
(In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #13)
> Can you try this patch? I am not sure it is a correct way.
This one worked.
Applied patch, rebuilt and installed kernel, rebooted,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
k...@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #12 from Eric van Gyzen ---
I forgot to mention: ifconfig showed WOL features for me, too. WOL_MAGIC was
enabled.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #11 from Guido Falsi ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #8)
> Can you guys try the following and see if it helps?
At a first test I see similar behaviour as reported by Eric.
Network interface
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #10 from Sean Bruno ---
I wonder if we're going to need a variation on this linux kernel commit:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #9 from Eric van Gyzen ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #8)
That doesn't work, but I think it's part of the fix: Before the patch, when I
powered off the system from FreeBSD, the NIC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #8 from Sean Bruno ---
Can you guys try the following and see if it helps?
Index: if_em.c
===
--- if_em.c(revision 308404)
+++ if_em.c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
Warren Block changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
--- Comment #6 from Guido Falsi ---
Has there been any progress related to this issue? Any chance to get a fix in
time to have it included in 11.0?
Thanks in advance.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
26 matches
Mail list logo