Re: is lagg (re+wlan) working on 11.0-RELEASE?

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > thanks for quick reply > > J.R. Oldroyd wrote: > > There is a work-around. Configure the re interface with the MAC > > address of the wlan instead of the other way around. > > I done it and here is what

[Bug 208343] [em] wake on lan not working with Intel I219 V2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343 --- Comment #23 from Sean Bruno --- (In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #22) Thank you for working on this. Let's see if we can get some folks testing various igb(4) devices for success. -- You are receiving

Adding variant of SO_TIMESTAMP: bumping so_options from short to int or some other way around?

Hi folks, we are working on some extra socket options, which is getting monotinic timestamps instead of realtime. That might be extremely useful in the Real World[tm] situations. Before looking at the code closely I've considered SO_TIMESTAMP_MT. But then and I've found that are are out of space

[Bug 208343] [em] wake on lan not working with Intel I219 V2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343 Kaho Toshikazu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #177062|0 |1

Re: NAT Reflection rules for FreeBSD PF

Oliver Peter [2016-11-16 12:05 +0100] : > The interesting thing here is that /all/ traffic happens on lo0 - even for > jail1 which sits on lo1 only - which I don't understand. I had been wondering about the same thing some while ago: http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-questions=147049889417893=2

[Bug 208343] [em] wake on lan not working with Intel I219 V2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343 --- Comment #21 from Sean Bruno --- (In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #20) I think it is ok to *delete* the code being moved instead of #if 0 after testing confirms this as working. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 214385] L2TP control packets malformed [PATCH]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214385 --- Comment #3 from Joe Jones --- Hi Bjoern yes I think you are right, a newly allocated mbup should always have enough space for a 12 byte header. We thought maybe m_pullup was meant to be called anytime the

[Bug 214385] L2TP control packets malformed [PATCH]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214385 Joe Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #176852|0 |1

Re: NAT Reflection rules for FreeBSD PF

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:49:18PM +, Big Lebowski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Peter wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:03:54PM +, Big Lebowski wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter > > wrote: > > >

[Bug 208343] [em] wake on lan not working with Intel I219 V2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343 --- Comment #20 from Kaho Toshikazu --- Created attachment 177062 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=177062=edit a very initial patch to enable WOL for igb > The igb0 interface does

Re: is lagg (re+wlan) working on 11.0-RELEASE?

thanks for quick reply J.R. Oldroyd wrote: > There is a work-around. Configure the re interface with the MAC > address of the wlan instead of the other way around. I done it and here is what happens: 1. I boot notebook with wire *not* plugged in, wlan is up, associated and