Re: docbook breaks sysutils/hal

2006-10-31 Thread Jean-Yves Lefort
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:59:52 +0100 Marcus von Appen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sysutils/hal fails on install on my system whenever I have the docbook related ports already installed. Removing all of them and letting them install as dependency of hal works fine, but breaks hal upgrades, when

FreeBSD Port: eaccelerator-0.9.5.r1

2006-10-31 Thread John Smith
Hello, 0.9.5 releassed. http://eaccelerator.net/wiki/Release-0.9.5 Changes in this version (from 0.9.4): * This version brings full php 5.1 support, which has as side-effect that eAccelerator won't work anymore with php 4 on windows, but on other platforms this isn't a problem. * The

Re: openoffice.org-2.0 does not build on amd64 with 6.1

2006-10-31 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Vasil Dimov writes: is clearly truncated and is also precisely 128 characters long. While your NFS mount point /mnt/files/ adds only 11 characters to the file name, this may be enough to overflow a fixed 128 character buffer used by the idlc. Try mounting the NFS file system at say /mnt or

Re: openoffice.org-2.0 does not build on amd64 with 6.1

2006-10-31 Thread Marcin Cieslak
Vasil Dimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:06:55AM +, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: It seems that you have run into a know problem with the OpenOffice.org build system - it does not work when file names become too long. In the error message you posted, I've run into similar problem

xmms-musepack and libmpcdec

2006-10-31 Thread Trigve Siver
Hi, I have described my problem in this thread http://www.freebsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=45034 ... My problem is that when I use xmms-musepack plugin (which doesn't use libmpcdec library) from ports and play with it some MPC song, my CPU usage is bigger than using MPC decoder which

How to make minor changes

2006-10-31 Thread Paul Schmehl
I have two ports that were recently accepted into the tree. *After* they were accepted, someone involved with the project asked me to make the following changes to the Makefiles: I noticed that both sguil-server and sguil-sensor have this in the Makefile: $ grep -i squil * Makefile:COMMENT=

Re: what to use as global switch to not build x11 based ports ?

2006-10-31 Thread Vivek Khera
On Oct 28, 2006, at 2:39 AM, Andreas Klemm wrote: At the moment I only found the variable WITHOUT_X11. But its only for ports, that can be built optionally with and without X11 support. It doesn't hinder directly to built x11 stuff using ports collection. I also find that you need to set

make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrools

2006-10-31 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Submitter-Id: current-users Originator:Norikatsu Shigemura Organization: Ensure Technology LTD. Confidential: no Synopsis: make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrtools Severity: serious Priority: medium Category: ports Class: sw-bug Release:

Re: How to make minor changes

2006-10-31 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:04:34PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: If I submit PRs for this, do I have to set PORTREVISION to 1? Or does it matter for such a minor change? Since it doesn't affect the package (install/deinstall), PORTREVISION should not be bumped. mcl

Re: How to make minor changes

2006-10-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:04:34PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: I have two ports that were recently accepted into the tree. *After* they were accepted, someone involved with the project asked me to make the following changes to the Makefiles: I noticed that both sguil-server and

Re: How to make minor changes

2006-10-31 Thread James Raftery
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:04:34PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: If I submit PRs for this, do I have to set PORTREVISION to 1? Or does it matter for such a minor change? Incrementing PORTREVISION would invite users to `upgrade' their port. A change to COMMENT does not warrant users reinstalling

Re: make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrools

2006-10-31 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: [ ... ] Description: Some ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools and some ports dependeing on sysutils/cdrtools-cjk are conflicted. So I want to integrate to USE_GNOME= cdrtools and OPTIONify WITH_CJK.

Re: make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrools

2006-10-31 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 10/31/06, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: [ ... ] Description: Some ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools and some ports dependeing on sysutils/cdrtools-cjk are conflicted. So I want to integrate to USE_GNOME=

Re: make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrools

2006-10-31 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote: With respect to this, I don't want dvd+rw-tools to depend on X11 or GNOME. Does cdrtools have a dependenacy on GNOME? No, or not at the moment. If it doesn't then it would be better to add a USE_CDRTOOLS knob to bsd.port.mk that would allow

Re: make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrools

2006-10-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:15:21 -0600, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: [ ... ] Description: Some ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools and some ports dependeing on sysutils/cdrtools-cjk are conflicted. So I want to

Ports with version numbers going backwards: math/vtk43-headers

2006-10-31 Thread erwin
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming

portupgrade: should it recursively follow dependencies?

2006-10-31 Thread James Long
I've rebuilt my pkgdb: ns : 18:42:37 /root# pkgdb -fu --- Updating the pkgdb [Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 219 packages found (-0 +219)

Re: FreeBSD Port: icu-3.6

2006-10-31 Thread Jona Joachim
Lukashev Anton wrote: Hi, I'm having troubles almost the same as reported here: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=icuwildcard= Under amd64 and i386, while trying to install or update icu I see the following: * cut * /custrtrn/ ---[OK]

Re: FreeBSD Port: icu-3.6

2006-10-31 Thread Jona Joachim
Jona Joachim wrote: Lukashev Anton wrote: Hi, I'm having troubles almost the same as reported here: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=icuwildcard= Under amd64 and i386, while trying to install or update icu I see the following: * cut * /custrtrn/