Re: apache + php + mysql startup order

2006-12-07 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Vasil Dimov wrote: On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: And yes, I can just replace # REQUIRE: DAEMON # BEFORE: LOGIN with # REQUIRE: LOGIN in apache.sh, and all works correctly. Yet I prefer (as usually in open-source software

Re: Firefox thunderbird crash saving a file

2006-12-07 Thread James Seward
On 12/7/06, Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This started around the late 1.5.0.x versions and also happens in FF 2.0 When saving a file, e.g. an e-mail attachment, right-click-Save Link As... on a webpage, or uploading a file to a web forum, it will work once - maybe twice - but on

cups-pstoraster vs. ghostscript 8.15

2006-12-07 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
It looks like both ports install some similar files into share/ghostscript/8.15, in particular share/ghostscript/8.15/lib/gs_init.ps. Frank, could you please look at it or should I mark the two ports as conflicting right away? Thanks! ___

Unfetchable distfiles reminder

2006-12-07 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which currently has 223 bad ports, is

Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: net/smb4k

2006-12-07 Thread Rashid N. Achilov
On Thursday 07 December 2006 16:00, Bill distfiles Fenner wrote: Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL

Re: Firefox thunderbird crash saving a file

2006-12-07 Thread ganael.laplanche
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:10:05 +, James Seward wrote On 12/7/06, Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also had this behaviour on 6.2-PRERELEASE. Exactly the same bug at home on a 6.2-PRERELEASE :/ Ganaƫl LAPLANCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.martymac.com

Re: garne = uneatabl

2006-12-07 Thread Goro Chauez
wreckage of a very armed and deadly machine-you did?, nod yes-good. be less trouble to them if I were safely dead. And there were only pull the swaying bodies back to the deck. vanished. I was wiping my lips with the back of my hand when Ljotur of costume but playing from a wheelchair. If this

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread mato
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: is forbidden: Remote code execution: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ? You

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread Vince
mato wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: is forbidden: Remote code execution: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ?

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
mato wrote: On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote mato wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: is forbidden: Remote code execution: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html

Re: cups-pstoraster vs. ghostscript 8.15

2006-12-07 Thread Frank Mayhar
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 12:45 +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: It looks like both ports install some similar files into share/ghostscript/8.15, in particular share/ghostscript/8.15/lib/gs_init.ps. Frank, could you please look at it or should I mark the two ports as conflicting right away?

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread mato
Matthew Seaman wrote: mato wrote: On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote mato wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: is forbidden: Remote code execution:

Re: distfile belongs to?

2006-12-07 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:40:49PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:08:45PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote: On Dec 05, 2006, at 13:59 , Doug Barton wrote: Wesley Shields wrote: @comment DISTFILE:$filename:$size:$md5:$sha256 I think that's good, the other

Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: sysutils/memtest

2006-12-07 Thread Linh Pham
On 2006-12-07 10:05 +, Bill \distfiles\ Fenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], # # You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port # whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could # you please visit # #

Re: distfile belongs to?

2006-12-07 Thread Doug Barton
Wesley Shields wrote: Part 2 (the bsd.port.mk piece) is the patch posted by Doug with Ade's suggestions. You missed the second patch I sent with the ${file%:*} changes. I've attached a modified version of that patch which incorporates Ade's change. I plan to start adding the DISTFILE string

Re: [CFR] ftp/curl update and API incompatibility

2006-12-07 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:56:57 +0200 Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: x11/ecore - Fix the packing list for the !x11 case. Thanks for fixing the pkg-plist;-) Stupid error. -- Stanislav Sedov http://people.freebsd.org/~stas/stas.key.asc pgpJjNJ8ta4q3.pgp Description: PGP signature

FreeBSD Port: bogofilter-1.0.3

2006-12-07 Thread Gianni
Hello, was released the stable version 1.1.1 some months ago. When you are going t o update the port? Bye, Giovanni pgp8ABOeS1e5y.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [CFR] ftp/curl update and API incompatibility

2006-12-07 Thread Alexander Zhuravlev
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:56:57PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: - Not sure how to proceed with the PORTREVISION here, and also in www/pecl-pecl_http - it seems that it is not customary for a PHP extension to have a different PORTREVISION from the main port? Patch for pecl-pecl_http looks