Re: Joomla 1.0.12 from ports master sites is corrupted!!

2007-04-17 Thread Karel Rous
Try to look at the contents of the file, it looks like response from some kind of redirection or response of some proxy server (the file should be probably html or ASCII text). Karel Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: Today.. My task is to install Joomla on my FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE box...

Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Vizion
I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual-mailman.db. I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db I have gonne through the docs but am obviously missing something. Could anyone please let me know: 1. How

ports/111417 [PATCH] security/vscan: Update update_dat for 5000 dat Files

2007-04-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can I interest a committer in a quick patch? ports/111417[PATCH] security/vscan: Update update_dat for 5000 dat files This patches the update_dat script to deal with version numbers greater than 5000, which happened a couple of weeks ago. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman

portupgrade -s broken in portupgrade 2.2.6

2007-04-17 Thread James
hihi. Is portupgrade -s still supported and/or known to be working in portupgrade 2.2.6? Currently I have two machines using portupgrade 2.2.6 all my others are using pre-2.0 versions. The new machines show this problem. The old ones work fine. If I do a portupgrade -vsb portname it'll

Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual- mailman.db. I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db I have gonne through the docs but am obviously missing something. Could

Re: Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Vizion
From: Jeffrey Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/04/17 Tue AM 08:51:42 PDT To: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual-

How to clean ...

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
How to delete old files, I have the list in the pkg-plist and I wan to delete files older than a specified date which are in the list? I can't re-install because it can upgrade files which I wan to keed (newer than the date). Does an utility do this? -- regis

Re: [wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:24:25 +0200 regisr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I launch wine just build from ports tree (cvsup yesterday) installed with portupgrade, I have the following error message: ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found But the lib is in right place... It is the only

Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Vizion wrote: From: Jeffrey Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db To create these files the first time, run

mailman

2007-04-17 Thread David Southwell
I am having problems getting /data/virtual-mailman.db created. Here are the errors I am getting from maillog: Apr 17 05:09:23 dns1 postfix/master[687]: reload configuration /usr/local/etc/postfix Apr 17 05:09:34 dns1 postfix/cleanup[3738]: fatal: open database

Re: mailman

2007-04-17 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Apr 17, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Southwell wrote: Could anyone please tell me what I need to check, the process by which virtual-mailman.db is created. If possible an example from the relevant config files would be really appreciated. There should be a file called virtual-mailman which

grace 5.1.21 port

2007-04-17 Thread Xavier Otazu
Hello: I do not know if this e-mail account is a mail-list or a personal e-mail. Anyway, I woul like to say to the maintainer of this port to upgrade it to the newest recent version, i.e. 5.1.21. Thanks a lot for your work! cheers Xavier

Re: portupgrade -s broken in portupgrade 2.2.6

2007-04-17 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
James wrote: hihi. Is portupgrade -s still supported and/or known to be working in portupgrade 2.2.6? Currently I have two machines using portupgrade 2.2.6 all my others are using pre-2.0 versions. The new machines show this problem. The old ones work fine. Well, I don't know where this

upgrade Gimp does work like mentioned in UPDATING

2007-04-17 Thread Heino Tiedemann
hi, Problem Gimp. in UPDATING: , | 20070404: | AFFECTS: users of graphics/gimp and graphics/gimp-devel | AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | The gimp[-devel] port is now a meta-port so users will need to upgrade via | one of the following examples. Gimp now depends on gutenprint

Re: mailman

2007-04-17 Thread David Southwell
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 09:55:38 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Apr 17, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Southwell wrote: Could anyone please tell me what I need to check, the process by which virtual-mailman.db is created. If possible an example from the relevant config files would be really

Re: [wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:58:19 +0900 Norikatsu Shigemura [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: It's well-known problem. The maximum hard-limit data size (kern.maxdsiz) is too big (over about 1GB). So you may set kern.maxdsiz=805306368 to your /boot/loader.conf. Thanks. It is working.

Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Adam Stroud
All: I was just on the FreeBSD list of projects and ideas fot volunteers page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the portupgrade in C utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's needed. A -- Adam P. Stroud Intelligent Systems Division BAE Systems, Advanced

Re: [wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
It's well-known problem. The maximum hard-limit data size (kern.maxdsiz) is too big (over about 1GB). So you may set kern.maxdsiz=805306368 to your /boot/loader.conf. Ok I find the following PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94413 May be this info should be

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread RW
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:31:39 -0400 Adam Stroud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just on the FreeBSD list of projects and ideas fot volunteers page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the portupgrade in C utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's needed. What

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 4/18/07, Adam Stroud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All: I was just on the FreeBSD list of projects and ideas fot volunteers page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the portupgrade in C utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's needed. I think that some projects

Re: upgrade Gimp does work like mentioned in UPDATING

2007-04-17 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Tuesday, 17. April 2007, Heino Tiedemann wrote: hi, Problem Gimp. in UPDATING: , | 20070404: | AFFECTS: users of graphics/gimp and graphics/gimp-devel | AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | The gimp[-devel] port is now a meta-port so users will need to upgrade | via one of

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
RW wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:31:39 -0400 Adam Stroud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just on the FreeBSD list of projects and ideas fot volunteers page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the portupgrade in C utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's

Tracking port and package flags/options

2007-04-17 Thread James E. Flemer
[Please maintain CC.] Here are some patches to the FreeBSD package tools, and the ports infrastructure to track make flags/options used to build a port/package. I've been using these changes locally for something like 2-3 years. This greatly helps me manage packages across several machines,