Steven Hartland wrote:
I'm trying to install ports into a jail but even some
key ports like don't seen to support this option
even to the extent they appear to break the host OS
deleting files.
I'm assuming this shouldn't be the case?
I don't see DESTIR mentioned in ports(7) or in the
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-prefix.html
- Original Message -
From: [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Packages not
Steven Hartland wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
I'm trying to install ports into a jail but even some
key ports like don't seen to support this option
even to the extent they appear to break the host OS
deleting files.
I'm assuming this shouldn't be the case?
I don't
Hi,
I am trying to track down a problem with building mplayer with debug
symbols. The problem is that this seems possible (at least on my
machine) only if it is compiled with
-O{1|2|3} -fomit-frame-pointer
due to one of its incredibly smart inline-asm sections.
Now, when using WITH_DEBUG in a
Hi,
On 02/05/07, Alexander Nedotsukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you need to add DEBUG_FLAGS=-g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer.
DEBUG_FLAGSyes, sure, that's it. I should have seen/remembered that :-(
Thanks for pointing it out,
Riggs
___
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 21:56:29 Kris Kennaway wrote:
It is a knob used by the port framework to override the check for an
existing installation of the package. It is almost never a good idea
to use it unless you know what you're doing, because it will corrupt
well, thank's
gnome-libtool:
Why is www/linux-firefox version 2.0.0.3 built using JavaScript version
1.4? Check the link below to see the JavaScript version you are using:
http://tychousa3.umuc.edu/sys/browserinfo.html
However, linux firefox version 2.0.0.3 downloaded from
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/ uses
On 5/2/07, Jesse Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is www/linux-firefox version 2.0.0.3 built using JavaScript version
1.4? Check the link below to see the JavaScript version you are using:
http://tychousa3.umuc.edu/sys/browserinfo.html
linux-firefox uses the official binary from mozilla.com.
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:45PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
All backed out.
Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continue that.
Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
Thomas Zander wrote:
[ ... ]
Is there an elegant solution to circumvent this and undefine WITH_DEBUG?
I think you need to add DEBUG_FLAGS=-g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer.
On some platforms, you'll need to get rid of -fomit-frame-pointer to have
usable stack frames
I can see this was removed a long time ago, but I do not see that need
to remove the option entirely.
Would it be much of a pain to ask someone to add it as an option. I
have attached a diff for the Make file.
10c10
PORTREVISION= 2
---
PORTREVISION= 3
38c38,39
OPTIONS= LDAPWith
I'm guilty of not reading the handbook.. I just assumed that revision
had to be bumped up. Or perhaps the reason for bumping it up is to
prevent systems from recompiling the port for no reason.
Anyway, I have attached the fixed unified diff.
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 5/2/07, Dan Casey [EMAIL
On 5/2/07, Dan Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guilty of not reading the handbook.. I just assumed that revision
had to be bumped up. Or perhaps the reason for bumping it up is to
prevent systems from recompiling the port for no reason.
Anyway, I have attached the fixed unified diff.
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully.
The current plan is the following:
1) Tag ports with PRE_XORG_7 and freeze
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Secondly, X7.2 as I tried it wouldn't startx if some other login had
created a .Xauthority file. While rm .Xauthority solved the problem
completely, I don't think this is user
Apparently teTeX development/support ended on May 2006 (according
to http://www.tug.org/tetex/) and people (from the accounts on
comp.text.tex newsgroup) seem to be moving, or already
have moved, to Tex Live.
How long would teTeX ports remain available?
Will there be any Tex Live port in our
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Martin Tournoij wrote:
On Wed 02 May 2007 14:05, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:26:25PM -0600, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
In particular all ports committers are expected to participate in this
process of eating our own dogfood :)
Our marketing folks educated me to use the phrase drinking our own
champagne instead. :)
5) CVS will stay frozen for a period to be evaluated
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
In particular all ports committers are expected to participate in this
process of eating our own dogfood :)
Our marketing folks educated me to use the phrase drinking our own
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Does this freeze apply to the whole ports tree, or only (relatively
directly) affected parts of the tree?
The latter is basically most of the tree :-)
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Hello.
I have applied the libublio patch to the current ntfs-3g and integrated
with fjoe's aligned I/O layer. Before the read/write speed was about
2/1.2 MB/s, and now about 15/9 MB/s (of course depends on many things,
but to illustrate the point that is drastically improves performance).
The
On Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:22 -0400
Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui
The options must be seperate flags. i.e.
On 3/30/07, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear xpi-extensions maintainers,
Some of you granted me an implicit approval for
routine updates of your xpi ports. That was some
time ago and now I ask you to renew the approval.
If you want to, just reply to this mail (you
don't need to
On Wed, May 02, 2007, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:45PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
All backed out.
Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
strong opposition and
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:31:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
3) Once the proposed upgrade method is in place, we will publish a
tarball of the prepared ports tree and request that *all* our ports
developers test the upgrade on their own machines before it is
committed to CVS. There are many
Hi all,
Just out of curiosity, why is Python 2.4.4 the default version under
lang/python instead of 2.5.1?
-David
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fortune
Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On 03/05/07, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On some platforms, you'll need to get rid of -fomit-frame-pointer to have
usable stack frames in the output executable for the debugger to use.
Depending on the code and the bug in question, it might be easier to see
what's going on using only
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:31:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully.
The
On 5/3/07, Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently teTeX development/support ended on May 2006 (according
to http://www.tug.org/tetex/) and people (from the accounts on
comp.text.tex newsgroup) seem to be moving, or already
have moved, to Tex Live.
How long would teTeX ports remain available?
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:16:42AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
gnome-libtool: link: `/usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la' is not a valid
libtool
I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt.
grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib
should show you the
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:36:46PM -0400, David Stanford wrote:
Hi all,
Just out of curiosity, why is Python 2.4.4 the default version under
lang/python instead of 2.5.1?
Updating to 2.5.1 involves lots of (simple) work to fix the resulting
breakage to ports, if you are interested in helping
34 matches
Mail list logo
