Hey,
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3. When I rebuilt my system, I added the
options in make.conf so it does not rebuild sendmail, then I installed the
updated version of sendmail from ports. My make.conf options for the
sendmail port are:
SENDMAIL_WITHOUT_IPV6=yes
SENDMAIL_WITHOUT_MILTER=yes
It seems like php5 port is stuck at 5.2.1 version (I didnt check php4)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/php5/
However php.net has 2 new releases which fix security problems.
http://www.php.net/
Affected package: php5-5.2.1_3 (matched by php55.2.2)
Type of problem: php --
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:46:19AM +0300, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
It seems like php5 port is stuck at 5.2.1 version (I didnt check php4)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/php5/
However php.net has 2 new releases which fix security problems.
http://www.php.net/
Affected
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than to
download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the recursive pulling
in of dependencies.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello!
Not sure if this is a success mail because i did not 100% exactly what
written in UPDATING:
1. instead of portupgrade -a i do it with portupgrade -ak ¹)
2. installed xf86-video-ati-6.6.3_2 while the big update process
(had some silly thought - so please don't ask... ;-))
3. after the
On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:46:19 +0300
Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
It seems like php5 port is stuck at 5.2.1 version (I didnt check php4)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/php5/
However php.net has 2 new releases which fix security problems.
http://www.php.net/
On 5/12/07, Andy Kosela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to present to you the new utility to deal with the ports
system. The main goal of this project is to provide one common tool
for managing ports and packages instead of relying on many
applications (pkg_add, pkg_delete,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Amendment two: for now you need to build your own INDEX or portupgrade
probably won't work correctly. Before running portupgrade do:
portsdb -U
It's a weird complain. portsdb -U just run make index (roughly to say).
May be I something miss here?
--
Dixi.
Sem.
On 5/12/07, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/07, Andy Kosela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to present to you the new utility to deal with the ports
system. The main goal of this project is to provide one common tool
for managing ports and packages instead
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 à 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
Dear porters,
Hello,
Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
CVS.
I'm still upgrading, but have noticed an error
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 à 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
CVS.
And another failure in devel/ode:
checking whether cc accepts -g...
Hello,
I'm new to port writing however I've put together a basic port to
install coldfusion 7.0.2 developer edition... Which can actually be
converted to an enterprise release if you had a valid license.
If you have any questions please feel free to write me back I am looking
forward to
On Sat, 12 May 2007 12:32:38 +0200
[LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than
to download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the
recursive pulling in of dependencies.
Does that matter all that much when there are
RW wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 12:32:38 +0200
[LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than
to download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the
recursive pulling in of dependencies.
Does that matter all that much
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:32:38PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than to
download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the recursive
pulling in of dependencies.
I think that before you abandon something you should
hello
i've updated to xorg7.2 on my lappy (hp nx7400), here's the
typescript: http://phoemix.harmless.hu/ports-xorg72-upgrade.bz2
the last few part that happend after the reboot are not in there,
those involved the upgrade.sh, removal of LOCALBASE/lib/modules (since
it contained only 6.9
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:32:38PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than
to download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the
recursive pulling in of dependencies.
I think that before you abandon
Le Sam 12 mai 07 à 19:40:11 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:32:38PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than to
download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the recursive
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 07:54:57PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:32:38PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than
to download, build and install. I think it's time to abandon the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings folks, I have a query about the requirements for this port.
I have MySQL Server Client 5.1.15, plus I was planning on installed
p5-DBD-mysql51 ...
Is that OK as they are newer versions? Or will ports require that the
older versions be
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:33:40PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 07:54:57PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:32:38PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:33:40PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I've done a little poking around. As of right now, I think that the
registering takes a huge amount of time inside of a function called
sortdeps which may be found in /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib/deps.c.
Has
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:33:40PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I've done a little poking around. As of right now, I think that the
registering takes a huge amount of time inside of a function called
sortdeps which may be found in
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:53:22AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:33:40PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I've done a little poking around. As of right now, I think that the
registering takes a huge amount of time inside of a function called
sortdeps
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:30:52PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:53:36PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I believe that if this function is optimized, that practically all of the
slowness issues we have seen with pkg_add, pkg_deinstall, etc, will be
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 07:54:57PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:32:38PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register
On Fri, 11 May 2007 09:47:49 -0700
Ed Lucero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I was interested in finding out when dspam 3.8.0 Stable will be
ported.
It's in -devel, I'll will MFD it after the Ports freeze is over.
--
IOnut
___
I have the following error when running glxgears using the ATI driver:
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 158 (DAMAGE)
Minor opcode of failed request: 4 ()
Serial number of failed request: 37
Current
Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386
box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade).
I used portupgrade-devel, but started with stale INDEX. For
this reason or not, I stumbled upon the libXft quirk. Stopped
the upgrade when I saw a few pkg_create's to take far
On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:00:51AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386
box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade).
I used portupgrade-devel, but started with stale INDEX.
On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:53:00 pm vehemens wrote:
I have the following error when running glxgears using the ATI driver:
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 158 (DAMAGE)
Minor opcode of failed request: 4
vehemens wrote:
I have the following error when running glxgears using the ATI driver:
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 158 (DAMAGE)
Minor opcode of failed request: 4 ()
Serial number of failed
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:42:23AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
After the upgrade I don't have glxgears or glxinfo on my system. Could anyone
tell me which port they belong to?
graphics/mesa-demos.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do make
install on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
my computer it turns the pkg_create from taking about 4 minutes to the
blink of an eye. Now people need to figure out how to speed up the
make
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do make
install on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
my computer it turns the pkg_create from taking about 4 minutes to the
blink of an eye. Now people need to figure out how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
Greetings folks, I have a query about the requirements for this port.
I have MySQL Server Client 5.1.15, plus I was planning on installed
p5-DBD-mysql51 ...
Is that OK as they are newer versions? Or will ports require that
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:10:58PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings folks, I have a query about the requirements for this port.
I have MySQL Server Client 5.1.15, plus I was planning on installed
p5-DBD-mysql51 ...
Is that OK as they
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do make
install on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
my computer it turns the pkg_create from taking about 4 minutes to the
blink of an eye.
38 matches
Mail list logo
