Trying to install amavisd-new from ports in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Installation
can't find p5-Math-BigInt and suggests downloading it manually into
/usr/ports/distfiles. Even after downloading manually installation still can't
find it in /usr/ports/distfiles. Suggestions?
Thanks,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 08:15:23PM +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
From: Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:03:49PM +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I recently upgraded some FBSD6.2
Hi guys,
I have update X.org to 7.2 according to /usr/ports/UPDATING but my skype fails
to display any text. It just shows blank boxes instead of characters in both
menus and dialog/chat boxes. I`ve tried both skype and skype-devel. Ddo you
have any idea how to fix this?
Thanks
--
PGP
On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:14:31 +0200 Momchil Ivanov wrote:
I have update X.org to 7.2 according to /usr/ports/UPDATING but my skype
fails
to display any text. It just shows blank boxes instead of characters in both
menus and dialog/chat boxes. I`ve tried both skype and skype-devel. Ddo you
On 5/24/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:34:32PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
A seemingly better way may be to make these system vars
available in make by default.
Doesn't help anyone who runs -RELEASE, so a non-starter.
You can go ahead and say that
On 2007-May-23 14:51:37 +0200, Hagen Khl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Requesting insufficient memory window!: start: 0xeee0 end:
0xefef size 0x200
(EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to
(WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected!
I have this on my G550 as well (without mga_hal).
## Peter Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Requesting insufficient memory window!: start: 0xeee0 end:
0xefef size 0x200
(EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to
(WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected!
I have this on my G550 as well (without mga_hal).
Same here.
I haven't
Le Jeu 24 mai 07 à 12:16:26 +0200, Gabor Tjong A Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
What happens with discontinued projects?
They seem to pollute our ports tree.
http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is
discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports
What happens with discontinued projects?
They seem to pollute our ports tree.
http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is
discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports tree then?
I've noticed the same with several other ports.
Gabor Tjong A Hung escribió:
What happens with discontinued projects?
They seem to pollute our ports tree.
http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is
discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports tree then?
I've noticed the same with several other ports.
Synopsis: [PATCH] security/pam_per_user conflicts with security/courier-authlib
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 24 11:15:30 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Fix assignment.
With the upgrade of xorg 7.2, and the portupgrade -Rr 'gstreamer*'
part, I suddenly find the permissions of my /usr/local and certain
directories in there set to 700 instead of 755. Am I the only one
with this very interesting issue?
Edwin
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website:
On 5/24/07, Thierry Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Jeu 24 mai 07 à 12:16:26 +0200, Gabor Tjong A Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait:
What happens with discontinued projects?
They seem to pollute our ports tree.
http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is
Quoting Etienne Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi eculp,
Yes -- I'm gettting the same results here on
7.0-CURRENT.
I've compiled with gcc 3.4.6 and trying to start
/usr/local/bin/X returns a segmentation fault and the
message you've described below.
I dont know if that could help but maybe you
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:03:26 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does, if prodded in the right way (start X with -ignoreABI).
See my post on x11@ at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2007-May/004142.html
(it would even easier to find if I didn't wreck the
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested
Nice. Which GCC version did you used for compiling
all theses ports ?
I don't get anymore a segfault but still gets that
fatal error message about the missing font 'fixed'...
It looks like the /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc path
gets ignored by the fc-cache utility, even after
having
upgraded
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is
Neil Robins writes:
Trying to install amavisd-new from ports in FreeBSD
6.2-RELEASE. Installation can't find p5-Math-BigInt and suggests
downloading it manually into /usr/ports/distfiles. Even after
downloading manually installation still can't find it in
/usr/ports/distfiles.
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in bsd.gnome.mk and
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:21:09AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
I'm having the same issue. Investigating a little reveals the
size as listed in distinfo as 190172 and the size of the downloaded
tarball as ~7200.
Generally mismatches like this are returning HTML pages instead of the
desired
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:55 -0500:
Please send me the patch again, as an attachment, I'll give it some
workout :)
Here it is.
Without patch:
real12m28.513s
user12m30.657s
sys 4m6.943s
With patch:
real12m3.077s
user11m48.727s
sys
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Found saved configuration for cacti-0.8.6j.3_2
= cacti-0.8.6j.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
= Attempting to fetch from http://www.cacti.net/downloads/.
cacti-0.8.6j.tar.gz 100% of 1099 kB
Mark Linimon writes:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:21:09AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
I'm having the same issue. Investigating a little reveals the
size as listed in distinfo as 190172 and the size of the downloaded
tarball as ~7200.
Generally mismatches like this are returning HTML
Etienne Robillard wrote:
Nice. Which GCC version did you used for compiling
all theses ports ?
I don't get anymore a segfault but still gets that
fatal error message about the missing font 'fixed'...
It looks like the /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc path
gets ignored by the fc-cache
Careful about using USE_LDCONFIG with linux ports.
With the current ports infrastructure you may wind up running ldconfig
on the native ldconfig database (i.e., without -r /compat/linux).
As an example, try replacing INSTALLS_SHLIB=yes with USE_LDCONFIG=yes
in x11/linux-xorg-libs/Makefile. Then
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 07:35 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:30:57 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a G400, on 6.2 updated to yesterday, and xorg-7.2 (also
yesterday, with no previous 6.9), and a just-installed mga_hal, I
still get:
(EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to
and
(WW) MGA(0):
Hello All,
When I compile mesa-demos port I get the following:
=== Building for mesa-demos-6.5.3_1
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/demos'
cc -I../../include -fPIC -pedantic -I/usr/local/include -DUSE_XSHM -DHZ=100
-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
With a ports tree supped to about 11:00 local, I get this:
huff# grep -r /usr/X11R6 /usr/ports/x11* | wc -l
270
I take it there's a reason for all of these? A lot of them
seem to be in pkg_message, but still ...
Robert Huff
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:26:51PM +0200, Mario Frasca wrote:
since something like a year or so I've taken over the project
pywmdockapps, previously by Kristoffer Erlandsson.
the main web site has changed: it's now hosted on sourceforge.
http://pywmdockapps.sourceforge.net
I actually rolled
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 07:35 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam.
That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens.
Now I have to blacklist this address. Sheesh.
Reply-To: Duke Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Duke Cole [EMAIL
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:02:39PM -0700, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
The mailing lists are public and mirrored all over the world. It's too
late for that address, sorry.
mcl
___
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:02:39PM -0700, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam.
That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens.
Now I have to blacklist this address.
On May 24, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
Nobody. Spammers routinely search for email addresses by scraping
Google, websites, mailing list archives, and even word-list
dictionaries or random number generators.
I send mail
On 2007-May-24 12:02:39 -0700, Walter Ian Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
My guess is that you did.
I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam.
That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens.
Now I have
Walter Ian Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
This is a publicly available list (see lists.freebsd.org), so its likely
they grab the mail from it directly (or even read this list as well).
I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:03:00PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
With a ports tree supped to about 11:00 local, I get this:
huff# grep -r /usr/X11R6 /usr/ports/x11* | wc -l
270
I take it there's a reason for all of these?
Yes: They have not yet been changed. Feel free to
At 12:20 p -0700 05/24/2007, Chuck Swiger didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
On May 24, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
All right, who released my email address to spammers?
Nobody. Spammers routinely search for email addresses by scraping
Google, websites, mailing list
Has anyone seen this?
net_read.c: In function `open_pf':
net_read.c:1164: error: `BIOCGBLEN' undeclared (first use in this function)
net_read.c:1164: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
net_read.c:1164: error: for each function it appears in.)
*** Error code 1
Stop in
The ports tree is now fully open for commits now most of the Xorg
fallout has been fixed. There are still a few oustanding issues and
a lot of users are still in the progress of upgrading, so please be
gently with major changes that might conflict with those upgrades.
We thank everybody for
## Robert Huff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This is not working for me. (Which may not be a problem with
the driver, but I'd like to eliminate that possibility first)
With a G400, on 6.2 updated to yesterday, and xorg-7.2 (also
yesterday, with no previous 6.9), and a just-installed
Hello,
- Christopher Prance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
When I compile mesa-demos port I get the following:
I don't remember if I had exactly the same problem, but do you have
nvidia-drivers installed ? I had, and found that it has to be uninstalled
before mesa-demos can
Pat on the back to everyone involved, progression is good !
Hip Hip
Erwin Lansing wrote:
The ports tree is now fully open for commits now most of the Xorg
fallout has been fixed. There are still a few oustanding issues and
a lot of users are still in the progress of upgrading, so please
If you use 'make update', the default method is going to become portsnap.
Currently, if you do not define one of the Makevars PORTSNAP_UPDATE,
SUP_UPDATE, or CVS_UPDATE first, the code just complains at you and
does nothing.
This is one less thing that has to be set by default by an
From: Maho NAKATA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: setting gcc42 as default compiler
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:52:18 +0900 (JST)
Hi,
As 7-CURRENT is going to ship with gcc42,
I'd like to switch the default compiler for OOo ports to gcc42, too.
General
* depending on gcc-ooo which is
Are you planning to fix compilation with gcj as part of this commit? It
has been broken for some time now. While I haven't had the time to do a
test run with the most recent port yet, I don't expect the problems to
have miraculously gone away:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=107645
Hello,
Once I thought that WITH_GNUGCJ is good, but it had not been
maintained for long time.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=107645
Also, lang/gcc42 and lang/gcc42-withgcjawt
CONFLICTS, (not explicitly stated though),
I'd like to remove it soon.
still I don't lost motivation for GCJ
Se não visualizar correctamente este e-mail, consulte o endereço
http://newsletter.smf.com.pt
Mini HDD 2048MB USB 2,0 , leitura: 6,1mb/seg;escrita: 1,5mb/...
16,95€
NEXTBASE SDV185-SD
313,00€
ViewSonic VX1945wm - TFT LCD 19 wide
302,70€
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Wed, 09 May 2007 10:52:43 +0800,
Ganbold wrote:
Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in
/usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port?
I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but
no response from him.
Sorry. Of cource
53 matches
Mail list logo
