Hi all,
As you can see in the following quote, Richard Stallman has announced
the much anticipated Emacs 22 release.
% Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:17:24 -0400
% From: Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% Subject: Emacs 22.1 released
% Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%
% GNU
Giorgos Keramidas escribió:
Should we keep the editors/emacs-devel port, update it to Emacs 22.1 and
allow for some time of 'settling in' before we switch editors/emacs to
the 22.1 version?
It depends on the specific situation and the decision of the
maintainer(s). If it makes sense to have
Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
I was taking a look at why math/lapack fails to build on -CURRENT and
discovered that the port uses ${FC} to find the FORTRAN compiler. I
then discovered that /usr/share/mk/sys.mk defines ${FC} as f77 (or
fort77).
Hi,
On 4 Jun 2007, at 02:09, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
I was taking a look at why math/lapack fails to build on -CURRENT and
discovered that the port uses ${FC} to find the FORTRAN compiler. I
then discovered that /usr/share/mk/sys.mk
[LoN]Kamikaze ha scritto:
Make update is broken on my system. Due to the removal of PORTSNAP_UPDATE it
now complains about a missing PORTSSUPFILE (SUP_UPDATE is defined for updating
/usr/src) instead of using portsnap.
I've already notified portmgr and proposed two solutions for this issue.
on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing happens ...
$ portupgrade -f -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... portaudio-18.1_2 from
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:13:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Marek Holly wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build psi but I get following error:
There is a 0.11-RC1 available (http://forum.psi-im.org/thread/4447),
but it requires Qt4 and QCA2. We seem to have the former, but don't
seem to
Gabor Kovesdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Giorgos Keramidas escribió:
Should we keep the editors/emacs-devel port, update it to Emacs 22.1 and
allow for some time of 'settling in' before we switch editors/emacs to
the 22.1 version?
It depends on the specific situation and the decision of
Parv wrote:
sed: 1: s|^\(@comment[: unbalanced brackets ([])
sed: 1: s|^\(@comment[: unbalanced brackets ([])
sed: 1: s|^\(@comment[: unbalanced brackets ([])
sed: 1: s|^\(@comment[: unbalanced brackets ([])
The above lines are displayed twice: once when portupgrade starts and
once when it
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:48:01AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
I was taking a look at why math/lapack fails to build on -CURRENT and
discovered that the port uses ${FC} to find the FORTRAN compiler. I
then
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:43:03AM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
On 4 Jun 2007, at 02:09, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
I was taking a look at why math/lapack fails to build on -CURRENT and
discovered that the port uses ${FC} to find the
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:34:50 -0400
Indigo 23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded both vte to vte-0.16.4_1 (after supping my ports) and
reinstalled gnome-terminal again (just in case) and the artifact
problem still exists. Anyone else still experiencing it after
updating vte?
(Xfce Terminal)
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing happens ...
$ portupgrade -f -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
...
Hi,
On 4 Jun 2007, at 16:14, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:43:03AM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
[...]A better fix would be to make ports dependent on an appropriate
compiler port, but that's a lot of work and some users will prefer
ifc anyway.
The work has already been done for
on 04/06/2007 18:26 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The problem can be illustrated like follows:
$ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
... nothing happens ...
$
Maybe the suggestion to add
local_startup=/usr/local/etc/rc.d
to /etc/rc.conf after the merge should be added to /usr/ports/UPDATING.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:01 AM, snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
i've just installed exim on a small freebsd-based router -- via
PORTS install -- as a sendmail replacement. no probs, either.
now, I want to upgrade exim on that router to add 'just'
DNSBL-filtering on the router, and have it function as a
hi,
now, I want to upgrade exim on that router to add 'just'
DNSBL-filtering on the router, and have it function as a transparent
gateway to another lan-based, exim router.
Does that upgrade involve a different version of the exim tarball
than the one used in ports,
bad choice of words on
On Sunday 03 June 2007 19:43:56 martinko wrote:
Hallo,
I've installed new X.org 7.2 on clean 6.2-STABLE system and everything
went fine except for the following package:
pkg_version: font-adobe-utopia-type1-1.0.1 does not appear to be a valid
package!
I tried to reinstall it but that
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Makefile, line 108: Malformed conditional (${USE_GNOME:Mgtk12} ||
${USE_GNOME:Mimlib})
Makefile, line 111: if-less else
Makefile, line 113: if-less endif
make: fatal
21 matches
Mail list logo
