Hello,
I have been working on updating the ports/packages on my FreeBSD box via a
combination of portsnap and portupgrade and I have managed to get most of
the software upgraded to the latest version.
As part of the process I was upgrading (may have been pkg_add) Samba
2.something to
Hello,
I have been working on updating the ports/packages on my FreeBSD box via a
combination of portsnap and portupgrade and I have managed to get most of
the software upgraded to the latest version.
As part of the process I was upgrading (may have been pkg_add) Samba
2.something to
Hi, Robert!
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:15:51PM +0930, Robert Hettner wrote:
I tried make clean but still get the following
bradmann# cd /usr/ports/net/samba3
bradmann# make
=== samba-3.0.25a_1,1 dynamic DNS updates require ADS support.
*** Error code 1
When you install the port it
KIMURA Yasuhiro wrote:
Hello.
Would someone handle following PRs of repocopy request?
ports/114668
ports/114669
ports/114670
ports/114671
anray@ said he was too busy to handle them.
I'll care.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:17:24PM +0200, Mark Evenson wrote:
Which I would do but the [FreeBSD Bugs database][1] seems to not be
returning any matches to queries
Seems to be working fine for me now. However, I've seen a 'no PRs found'
page to be displayed sometimes,
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
KIMURA Yasuhiro wrote:
Hello.
Would someone handle following PRs of repocopy request?
ports/114668
ports/114669
ports/114670
ports/114671
anray@ said he was too busy to handle them.
I'll care.
Please also consider:
ports/115132: [repocopy] Please repocopy
LI Xin wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
KIMURA Yasuhiro wrote:
Hello.
Would someone handle following PRs of repocopy request?
ports/114668
ports/114669
ports/114670
ports/114671
anray@ said he was too busy to handle them.
I'll care.
Please also consider:
ports/115132: [repocopy] Please
Hi, Johan!
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:03:51PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Does anyone know when the latest samba will hit the ports tree?
Cc: me if you want to get an answer in a time fasion :)
Or is the maintainer busy with the samba, zfs issue on current.
3.0.25b had some issues that made
Mark Evenson wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:17:24PM +0200, Mark Evenson wrote:
Which I would do but the [FreeBSD Bugs database][1] seems to not be
returning any matches to queries
Seems to be working fine for me now. However, I've seen a 'no PRs found'
page to be
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:40:53PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/07/2007 17:13 Andriy Gapon said the following:
It seems that installation action of uppc-kmod port (do-install target)
uses incorrect tool to put uppc.ko in its destination. It seems that the
tool (${INSTALL_PROGRAM})
2 Aug 2007 16:30:19 -
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#
PORTNAME= qemu
-PORTVERSION= 0.9.0s.20070702
+PORTVERSION= 0.9.0s.20070802
CATEGORIES=emulators
MASTER_SITES= http://qemu.org/:release \
http://qemu-forum.ipi.fi/qemu-snapshots/:snapshot \
@@ -15,7 +15,7
Hi Folks,
I am having a weird problem, since upgrading several servers to the new
Xorg. These servers do not have full X installed on them, but do have
apps installed that depend on some X libraries.
When trying to install some ports, most recently subversion, when I type
make in the port
Trying to install rsyslog from ports and getting the following error:
net.h:72: warning: struct sockaddr_storage declared inside parameter
list
net.h:72: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which
is probably not what you want
omfwd.c: In function `doAction':
omfwd.c:571:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:47:14AM -0700, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am having a weird problem, since upgrading several servers to the new
Xorg. These servers do not have full X installed on them, but do have apps
installed that depend on some X libraries.
When trying to install
Thank you, Yuri
that solved it, make clean in the effected port also solved the problem
on those machines without portupgrade.
Silly of me, I should of realized that, although for the machines that I
used portupgrade on, doesn't it run make clean as a matter of course
when upgrading ports?
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 02:40:25PM -0700, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Thank you, Yuri
that solved it, make clean in the effected port also solved the problem on
those machines without portupgrade.
Silly of me, I should of realized that, although for the machines that I
used portupgrade on,
16 matches
Mail list logo
