On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:33:37PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but
it turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:17:00AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
~ $ echo -e
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:09:57PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
~ $ echo -e
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:19:10 +0200, Lena wrote
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:09:57PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
~ $
Mark Nowiasz wrote:
Hi,
when using portupgrade-devel, I'm getting the following errors:
--- Session ended at: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:58:52 +0100 (consumed 00:02:01)
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgversion.rb:41:in `initialize': : Not in
due form: 'version[_revision][,epoch]'.
I found a really useful (to me) module at CPAN - Snort::Rule - which can
dynamically create snort rules from a list of bad ips/hostnames. It's not in
ports, so I thought I'd create a port for it. But there's a problem. The CPAN
macro in ports looks in /modules/by-module, but this module
Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
The subject should already tell the most important news.
Find below the error messages shown by the compiler...
cc -O2 -pipe -O2 -pipe -DHAVE_LIBM=1
-DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1
-DSIZEOF_UNSIGNED_SHORT=2
On Jan 29, 2008 11:21 AM, David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a sysadmin, it's not unusual for me to have a desire to do similar
things on sets of systems; thus, when a colleague pointed out the
net/omnitty port to me, it didn't take long for me to find it useful.
But I noticed on 21
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan 16 18:39:53 PST 2008
Context:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread:
/usr/bin/objformat, for
more background). I chose to look at the possibility
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
My question is, should I submit this port even though it uses a non-
standard master site from CPAN?
Do it like this:
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_PERL_CPAN}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ../by-authors/id/S/SA/SAXJAZMAN/Snort
See for example how
--On Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:59:53 -0500 Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
My question is, should I submit this port even though it uses a non-
standard master site from CPAN?
Do it like this:
MASTER_SITES=
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread: /usr/bin/objformat,
for more background). I chose to look at the possibility of using Apache 2.0.
Out of interest, why did you choose 2.0 and not 2.2 ? When I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
~ $ echo -e dir
Quoting Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread: /usr/bin/objformat,
for more background). I chose to look at the possibility of using
Apache 2.0.
Out of interest, why
The info in /usr/ports/UPGRADING describing the steps to upgrade xorg
says to run xorg-upgrade. Unfortunately, I can't find *anything* with
this name anywhere on my system. Here's my uname output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:pf /usr/ports uname -a
FreeBSD sarlacc.austin.ibm.com 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
On Jan 31, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
One other question. Should the PORTNAME be lower case even though
the DISTNAME is not? Or does it matter?
Portname for perl ports is generally upper/lower case mix as the name
of the perl module itself. I don't think it needs to be
--On Thursday, January 31, 2008 16:51:21 -0500 Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
One other question. Should the PORTNAME be lower case even though
the DISTNAME is not? Or does it matter?
Portname for perl ports is generally upper/lower
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:56:23PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
The info in /usr/ports/UPGRADING describing the steps to upgrade xorg
says to run xorg-upgrade. Unfortunately, I can't find *anything* with
this name anywhere on my
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan 16 18:39:53 PST 2008
Context:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread:
/usr/bin/objformat, for
more
also already subscribed to the Apache dev list). My conclusion was that
the ultimate migration to 2, would be a lot smoother, and easier if moving
to 2.0 - the layout of both the server, and conf files are /very/ similar
(to 1.3).
O.K., that makes a lot of sense - I can't remember how I did
Hello Peter, and thank you for your thoughtful reply.
Quoting Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
also already subscribed to the Apache dev list). My conclusion was that
the ultimate migration to 2, would be a lot smoother, and easier if moving
to 2.0 - the layout of both the server, and conf files
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files to new places for the
7.x version.
/usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh
___
Bob Willcox wrote:
No, I'm not interested in the script(1) part. I am familiar with script
but wasn't interested in using it here. What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files to new places for the
7.x version.
xorg-upgrade is the file that script(1) spews
Well, to be Frank with you ( even though my name is Chris ;) ), having
to migrate ~50 conf files/layouts on top of mastering the /new/ Apache
way of doing things, on top of aquainting myself with the way the
modules /now/ do things, just isn't going to fit in my schedule. Oh sure
I hear you
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Lawrence Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Chris,
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm not an expert so I might be behind the
times on what I'm about to tell you...
Note taken. :)
Chris H. wrote:
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan
Hi Chris,
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm not an expert so I might be behind the times
on what I'm about to tell you...
Chris H. wrote:
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan 16 18:39:53 PST 2008
Context:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of
Hello Pete, and thank you for your continued input. I really appreciate it.
Quoting Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, to be Frank with you ( even though my name is Chris ;) ), having
to migrate ~50 conf files/layouts on top of mastering the /new/ Apache
way of doing things, on top of
Hi all !
I just recently installed a 6.3 Release.
All went fine until the qemu-launcher time arrives.
I have an error and i dont know howto report it
Can you help me or at least tellme a couple of guidelines ?
Thanks in advance
PS: Sorry for my English
--
Saludos.-
Leonardo Santagostini
I may try that. But I'm at a loss as to what that has to do with
getting php5 to build. As (mentioned earlier) I am unable to find
where php5 does anything more that to ask if I'm using Apache 1.3 || 2.
This puzzles me - my php5 from ports doesnt ask this at all. You just
build it and it finds
Quoting Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I may try that. But I'm at a loss as to what that has to do with
getting php5 to build. As (mentioned earlier) I am unable to find
where php5 does anything more that to ask if I'm using Apache 1.3 || 2.
This puzzles me - my php5 from ports doesnt ask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonardo Santagostini wrote:
Hi all !
I just recently installed a 6.3 Release.
All went fine until the qemu-launcher time arrives.
I have an error and i dont know howto report it
Can you help me or at least tellme a couple of guidelines ?
[I've kept your ccs, but I'm only subscribed to -stable]
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Hello Pete, and thank you for your continued input. I really appreciate it.
Quoting Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[.. huge snip.. ]
How about try configuring it *not* to build the apache
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:02:03AM +, Parish wrote:
Bob Willcox wrote:
No, I'm not interested in the script(1) part. I am familiar with script
but wasn't interested in using it here. What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files to new places for the
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:30:23AM +0100, Operator wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files to new places for the
7.x version.
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 21:26 -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:30:23AM +0100, Operator wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files to new places for
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:26:38 -0600, Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:30:23AM +0100, Operator wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:26:38 -0600
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:30:23AM +0100, Operator wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I want is the xorg-upgrade
program that is used to move a bunch of x11 files
Hi Chris,
Chris H. wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Lawrence Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Chris,
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm not an expert so I might be behind the
times on what I'm about to tell you...
Note taken. :)
Chris H. wrote:
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD
On 1/31/08, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:26:38 -0600, Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:30:23AM +0100, Operator wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I want is the
41 matches
Mail list logo
